You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Rory Winston <rw...@eircom.net> on 2004/12/14 13:58:21 UTC
[id] Remove dependency on codec?
If there are any [id] devs watching, do they think it might be
worthwhile removing the explicit dependency on [codec]? The only
portions of codec which are used in [id] are the Hex encoding and the
MD5/SHA-1 encoding routines. The hex encoding is trivial and could be
imported to the [id] codebase, and the MD5/SHA-1 routines just delegate
to the JDK methods anyways, so it seems a bit pointless.
Anyone got any objections?
Cheers,
Rory
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [id] Remove dependency on codec?
Posted by Phil Steitz <ph...@steitz.com>.
+1
-Phil
Rory Winston wrote:
> If there are any [id] devs watching, do they think it might be
> worthwhile removing the explicit dependency on [codec]? The only
> portions of codec which are used in [id] are the Hex encoding and the
> MD5/SHA-1 encoding routines. The hex encoding is trivial and could be
> imported to the [id] codebase, and the MD5/SHA-1 routines just delegate
> to the JDK methods anyways, so it seems a bit pointless.
>
> Anyone got any objections?
>
> Cheers,
> Rory
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [id] Remove dependency on codec?
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>.
+1
Stephen
--- Rory Winston <rw...@eircom.net> wrote:
> If there are any [id] devs watching, do they think
> it might be
> worthwhile removing the explicit dependency on
> [codec]? The only
> portions of codec which are used in [id] are the Hex
> encoding and the
> MD5/SHA-1 encoding routines. The hex encoding is
> trivial and could be
> imported to the [id] codebase, and the MD5/SHA-1
> routines just delegate
> to the JDK methods anyways, so it seems a bit
> pointless.
>
> Anyone got any objections?
>
> Cheers,
> Rory
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org