You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@xalan.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/07/04 13:20:37 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10476] New: -
Xalan treats relative paths differently to Saxon
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10476>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10476
Xalan treats relative paths differently to Saxon
Summary: Xalan treats relative paths differently to Saxon
Product: XalanJ2
Version: 2.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Minor
Priority: Other
Component: Xalan
AssignedTo: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
ReportedBy: jonathan.gray@netdecisions.com
I am not to sure whether this is a bug or not but I would like to think I could
swap Saxon for Xalan and back again at any point. I will submit this to
Saxon's Bugzilla as well.
I have a directory tree like
- xml
- xsl
- includes
The reference a file xsl/transform.xsl which includes a file in
xsl/includes/include.xsl. The include.xsl needs to also include something from
the xml directory so does so thus: ../xml/addinclude.xml.
This is where the two products differ. In Xalan it keeps the path consistent
with the main XSL file but in Saxon it seems to move to the includes directory
so the include needs to be ../../xml/addinclude.xml