You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Andrey Gura (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/24 16:26:25 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2854) Need to implement deadlock
detection
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15210403#comment-15210403 ]
Andrey Gura commented on IGNITE-2854:
-------------------------------------
*Suggested solution:*
# Tx manager executes deadlock detection procedure (if enabled) in the following cases:
** On Tx timeout (if enabled)
** On request (e.g. MBean)
** Periodically (if period configured)
# Choosing Tx candidate for deadlock detection:
** In case of deadlock detection triggered by Tx timeout then timed out Tx will be choosen.
** Otherwise get oldest Tx.
# Deadlock detection
** For chosen Tx get all cache entries ({{IgniteTxEntry}} instances) that involved into Tx.
** Each Tx entry contains node Id on which lock request sent. So deadlock detector has Ids of all nodes involved into Tx.
** Request Tx snapshot from all involved nodes if needed (Tx can involve only local node) and merge it with local Tx snapshot. _*Note:*_ _It makes sense retrieve Tx snapshot that contains only Txs that involve known Tx entries in order to reduce network traffic._
** If resulting Tx snapshot involves other nodes then request Tx snapshots from that nodes and merge all snapshot with resulting snapshot. _*Note:*_ _Actually we can first try to detect deadlock on current Tx snapshot and request Tx snapshots from other remote nodes only if deadlock isn't found._
** Build _resource allocation graph_ from {{GridCacheMvcc}}'s local candidates (owner candidate - lock aquired, not owner candidate - lock requested) and reduce it to _wait for graph (WFG)_.
** Try to find cycle in WFG.
** If cycle is found the deadlock detected
** otherwise choose another Tx candidate that is still not involved in deadlock detection procedrue and repeat whole procedure. _*Note:*_ _Repetition is redundant in cases when deadlock detection was triggered by Tx timout._
# Deadlock resolving (if configured)
It makes sense to rollback oldest Tx involved into detected deadlock. Especially for cases when Tx timout isn't defined.
> Need to implement deadlock detection
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-2854
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2854
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: cache
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0.final
> Reporter: Valentin Kulichenko
> Assignee: Andrey Gura
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> Currently, if transactional deadlock occurred, there is no easy way to find out which locks were reordered.
> We need to add a mechanism that will collect information about awating candidates, analyze it and show guilty keys. Most likely this should be implemented with the help of custom discovery message.
> In addition we should automatically execute this mechanism if transaction times out and add information to timeout exception.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)