RE: Typical spam not detected at all.. there is no rule for it :- \

[Chris Santerre <cs...@MerchantsOverseas.com>]

>	I know you don't like bayes, but it is the best single 
>tool for stock
>scams.  The trouble with counting '|' is the frequency of 
>transcribed spead-
>sheets would give too many FPs (typical is to use '|' to 
>separate the columns).
>Most scock scams use non-obfucated words to look legitimate 
>and things like
>"price", "soar", "undervalued", "goal", "target price", "due 
>di|igence", and
>"stock", etc. get well recognized by the bayes analyzer.
>
>	Paul Shupak
>	track@plectere.com

No argument there. I'm not getting much slipping thru at all. But I'm always
up for a new idea. 

--Chris