You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Dean Gaudet <dg...@arctic.org> on 1998/02/05 20:14:42 UTC
Re: other/1774: problems applying mod_servlet_c.patch to mod_servlet.c (this latter file is part of JSDK 1.0.1)
I would not be adverse to the java and perl projects using the same bug
reporting system. But it requires folks from those projects to be on
apache-bugdb and to have editing rights to the bugdb. I think it's
reasonable for our users to expect to report a bug to bugs.apache.org when
they get the code from {java,perl}.apache.org.
Dean
On 5 Feb 1998 marc@hyperreal.org wrote:
> Synopsis: problems applying mod_servlet_c.patch to mod_servlet.c (this latter file is part of JSDK 1.0.1)
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
> State-Changed-By: marc
> State-Changed-When: Thu Feb 5 07:37:25 PST 1998
> State-Changed-Why:
> Erm... I'm not sure what you expect us to do about it.
> I'm not sure exactly what mod_servlet_c.patch you are talking
> about or where you got it from, but it is on the Apache web site.
> It may be that the patch is for an older version of
> mod_servlet. You need to talk to whoever made the patch.
>
> In any case, I would recommend considering other more efficient
> options instead of mod_servelet. See http://java.apache.org/
> for details.
>
>
Re: other/1774: problems applying mod_servlet_c.patch to mod_servlet.c (this latter file is part of JSDK 1.0.1)
Posted by Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>.
On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Dean Gaudet wrote:
> I would not be adverse to the java and perl projects using the same bug
> reporting system. But it requires folks from those projects to be on
> apache-bugdb and to have editing rights to the bugdb. I think it's
> reasonable for our users to expect to report a bug to bugs.apache.org when
> they get the code from {java,perl}.apache.org.
But they aren't. This isn't for mod_jserv or whatever, this is for a
patch on one server by someone else for a module made by someone else.
If it was mod_jserv, I would leave it and let someone answer it.
>
> Dean
>
> On 5 Feb 1998 marc@hyperreal.org wrote:
>
> > Synopsis: problems applying mod_servlet_c.patch to mod_servlet.c (this latter file is part of JSDK 1.0.1)
> >
> > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
> > State-Changed-By: marc
> > State-Changed-When: Thu Feb 5 07:37:25 PST 1998
> > State-Changed-Why:
> > Erm... I'm not sure what you expect us to do about it.
> > I'm not sure exactly what mod_servlet_c.patch you are talking
> > about or where you got it from, but it is on the Apache web site.
> > It may be that the patch is for an older version of
> > mod_servlet. You need to talk to whoever made the patch.
> >
> > In any case, I would recommend considering other more efficient
> > options instead of mod_servelet. See http://java.apache.org/
> > for details.
> >
> >
>