You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Hans-Werner Friedemann <h-...@vds-herzberg.de> on 2010/09/30 10:02:44 UTC
Own Rule
Has anyone an idea how I can implement an check
whether the eMail-recipient is the sender an the eMail-Adress appears in
the subject to?
Thanks for answering!
Re: AW: Own Rule
Posted by Ned Slider <ne...@unixmail.co.uk>.
On 04/10/10 07:00, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
> Sorry, but is it possible to combine
> __TO_EQ_FROM and __FROM_IN_SUBJECT in a meta rule?
>
> Can somebody help me to build this rule?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
meta TO_EQ_FROM_IN_SUBJECT (__TO_EQ_FROM && __FROM_IN_SUBJECT)
describe TO_EQ_FROM_IN_SUBJECT Hits __TO_EQ_FROM and
__FROM_IN_SUBJECT
score TO_EQ_FROM_IN_SUBJECT 0.01
Adjust the score as you see fit.
Re: AW: Own Rule
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
> Sorry, but is it possible to combine
> __TO_EQ_FROM and __FROM_IN_SUBJECT in a meta rule?
>
> Can somebody help me to build this rule?
Please look at the reply to "Own Rule" I posted in the last two days.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm seriously considering getting one of those bright-orange prison
overalls and stencilling PASSENGER on the back. Along with the paper
slippers, I ought to be able to walk right through security.
-- Brian Kantor in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
74 days until TRON Legacy
Re: AW: Own Rule
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On man 04 okt 2010 08:00:59 CEST, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote
>
>> Sorry, but is it possible to combine
>> __TO_EQ_FROM and __FROM_IN_SUBJECT in a meta rule?
>>
>> Can somebody help me to build this rule?
>
> meta foo (__TO_EQ_FROM && __FROM_IN_SUBJECT)
Or just wait for FROM_IN_TO_AND_SUBJ to be promoted from my sandbox...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm seriously considering getting one of those bright-orange prison
overalls and stencilling PASSENGER on the back. Along with the paper
slippers, I ought to be able to walk right through security.
-- Brian Kantor in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
74 days until TRON Legacy
Re: AW: Own Rule
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.org>.
On man 04 okt 2010 08:00:59 CEST, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote
> Sorry, but is it possible to combine
> __TO_EQ_FROM and __FROM_IN_SUBJECT in a meta rule?
>
> Can somebody help me to build this rule?
meta foo (__TO_EQ_FROM && __FROM_IN_SUBJECT)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
AW: Own Rule
Posted by Hans-Werner Friedemann <h-...@vds-herzberg.de>.
Sorry, but is it possible to combine
__TO_EQ_FROM and __FROM_IN_SUBJECT in a meta rule?
Can somebody help me to build this rule?
Thanks in advance
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: John Hardin [mailto:jhardin@impsec.org]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Oktober 2010 04:00
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Own Rule
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, RW wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin
>> <jh...@impsec.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
>> >
>> > > Has anyone an idea how I can implement an check whether the
>> > > eMail-recipient is the sender an[d] the eMail-Adress appears in
>> > > the subject to[o]?
>> >
>> > Use the __TO_EQ_FROM meta rule that's being distributed via
>> > sa-update.
>> >
>> > What exactly do you want to check for?
>>
>> As I read it he wants
>>
>> __TO_EQ_FROM && __FROM_IN_SUBJECT
>>
>> where __FROM_IN_SUBJECT would presumably be constructed in a similar
>> way to __TO_EQ_FROM
>
> Gah. Quick answer after brief skim. Sorry.
>
> I'll put that together and add it to my sandbox, likely tomorrow.
...not too shabby:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20101002-r1003754-n/T_FROM_IN_TO_AND_SUBJ/detail
I'll promote it shortly if it keeps that level of performance.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
No representation without taxation!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
76 days until TRON Legacy
Re: Own Rule
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, RW wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
>> John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
>> >
>> > > Has anyone an idea how I can implement an check whether the
>> > > eMail-recipient is the sender an[d] the eMail-Adress appears in
>> > > the subject to[o]?
>> >
>> > Use the __TO_EQ_FROM meta rule that's being distributed via
>> > sa-update.
>> >
>> > What exactly do you want to check for?
>>
>> As I read it he wants
>>
>> __TO_EQ_FROM && __FROM_IN_SUBJECT
>>
>> where __FROM_IN_SUBJECT would presumably be constructed in a similar
>> way to __TO_EQ_FROM
>
> Gah. Quick answer after brief skim. Sorry.
>
> I'll put that together and add it to my sandbox, likely tomorrow.
...not too shabby:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20101002-r1003754-n/T_FROM_IN_TO_AND_SUBJ/detail
I'll promote it shortly if it keeps that level of performance.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
No representation without taxation!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
76 days until TRON Legacy
Re: Own Rule
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
> John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone an idea how I can implement an check whether the
>>> eMail-recipient is the sender an[d] the eMail-Adress appears in the
>>> subject to[o]?
>>
>> Use the __TO_EQ_FROM meta rule that's being distributed via sa-update.
>>
>> What exactly do you want to check for?
>
> As I read it he wants
>
> __TO_EQ_FROM && __FROM_IN_SUBJECT
>
> where __FROM_IN_SUBJECT would presumably be constructed in a similar way
> to __TO_EQ_FROM
Gah. Quick answer after brief skim. Sorry.
I'll put that together and add it to my sandbox, likely tomorrow.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think Microsoft cares about your needs at all?
"A company wanted to hold off on upgrading Microsoft Office for a
year in order to do other projects. So Microsoft gave a 'free' copy
of the new Office to the CEO -- a copy that of course generated
errors for anyone else in the firm reading his documents. The CEO
got tired of getting the 'please re-send in XX format' so he
ordered other projects put on hold and the Office upgrade to be top
priority." -- Cringely, 4/8/2004
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
78 days until TRON Legacy
Re: Own Rule
Posted by RW <rw...@googlemail.com>.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
>
> > Has anyone an idea how I can implement an check whether the
> > eMail-recipient is the sender an[d] the eMail-Adress appears in the
> > subject to[o]?
>
> Use the __TO_EQ_FROM meta rule that's being distributed via sa-update.
>
> What exactly do you want to check for?
As I read it he wants
__TO_EQ_FROM && __FROM_IN_SUBJECT
where __FROM_IN_SUBJECT would presumably be constructed in a similar way
to __TO_EQ_FROM
Re: Own Rule
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
> Has anyone an idea how I can implement an check whether the
> eMail-recipient is the sender an the eMail-Adress appears in the subject
> to?
Use the __TO_EQ_FROM meta rule that's being distributed via sa-update.
What exactly do you want to check for? By itself it's not useful, and I
have several combination metas with it that are doing fairly well in
masscheck (and which the score generator is unfortunately assigning low or
zero scores to).
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Microsoft's invented the ASCII equivalent to ugly ink spots that
appear on your letter when your pen is malfunctioning.
-- Greg Andrews, about Microsoft's way to encode apostrophes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
78 days until TRON Legacy