You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openmeetings.apache.org by Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com> on 2019/01/22 19:16:37 UTC
Development move to 5.0
With Adobe announcing their ending support for flash in 2020 and most
major browsers (expect Firefox) starting to block and require acceptance
to run flash each time a page is loaded with it; was wondering if there
was a cut off date for advancements in Version 4 and the migration to
version 5?
I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a few bugs but
understandable since it was not the main development platform.
Re: recording interview room
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
NP :)
Glad it is resolved
Sad absence of camera stream is not being reported by OM ...
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 18:59 Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> got it working... unplug/plug cam seems to resolve it... I could record
> something...
>
> Sorry for this...
> Greetings Peter
>
> Am 23.01.19 um 12:53 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
> Sure :)
> Meanwhile I'll do some tests using home laptop :)
> Ping me tomorrow :)
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 18:51 Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de wrote:
>
>> unfortunately then I will be out of office... sons swimtraining... :-(
>>
>> Maybe tomorrow?
>>
>> Am 23.01.19 um 12:38 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>
>> Will only be able to join in approx. 1 hour
>> Need time to get home :)
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 18:08 Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>
>>> interview room in public room at next
>>>
>>> Greetings Peter
>>>
>>> Am 23.01.19 um 11:02 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>
>>> weird enough, just made recording and everything seems to be OK
>>>
>>> Ubuntu 16.04 Chrome latest
>>> Can it be camera issue?
>>> I can enter the same room and check if I can see your picture ....
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 17:00, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nope
>>>> All recorded flv files have size of 186 bytes
>>>> something weird
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:58, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Could you please share longer log?
>>>>> (ffmpeg might be outdated ...)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:54, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> hmmm... also no luck with longer recordings... restart/using Firefox
>>>>>> or Chrome... no luck
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /opt/openmeetings-4.0.8.r524/webapps/next/streams/1/rec_505_stream_61CDBE07-02B2-8E62-D58B-7A19C50FDB9E_2019_01_23_10_45_28.flv:
>>>>>> could not find codec parameters
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any Ideas?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 23.01.19 um 09:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Peter,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> just have checked the logs
>>>>>> saved camera stream is 186 bytes only
>>>>>> seems to be too short to have real data
>>>>>>
>>>>>> will try to double-check recording later today ....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:13, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tried to make a recording in the interview room
>>>>>>> (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public). Is it
>>>>>>> broken?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Greetings Peter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> WBR
>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: recording interview room
Posted by Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>.
Hi Maxim,
got it working... unplug/plug cam seems to resolve it... I could record
something...
Sorry for this...
Greetings Peter
Am 23.01.19 um 12:53 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> Sure :)
> Meanwhile I'll do some tests using home laptop :)
> Ping me tomorrow :)
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 18:51 Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de
> <ma...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>
> unfortunately then I will be out of office... sons swimtraining... :-(
>
> Maybe tomorrow?
>
> Am 23.01.19 um 12:38 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>> Will only be able to join in approx. 1 hour
>> Need time to get home :)
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 18:08 Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de
>> <ma...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> interview room in public room at next
>>
>> Greetings Peter
>>
>> Am 23.01.19 um 11:02 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>> weird enough, just made recording and everything seems to be OK
>>>
>>> Ubuntu 16.04 Chrome latest
>>> Can it be camera issue?
>>> I can enter the same room and check if I can see your
>>> picture ....
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 17:00, Maxim Solodovnik
>>> <solomax666@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nope
>>> All recorded flv files have size of 186 bytes
>>> something weird
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:58, Maxim Solodovnik
>>> <solomax666@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Could you please share longer log?
>>> (ffmpeg might be outdated ...)
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:54, Peter Dähn
>>> <daehn@vcrp.de <ma...@vcrp.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>> hmmm... also no luck with longer recordings...
>>> restart/using Firefox or Chrome... no luck
>>>
>>> /opt/openmeetings-4.0.8.r524/webapps/next/streams/1/rec_505_stream_61CDBE07-02B2-8E62-D58B-7A19C50FDB9E_2019_01_23_10_45_28.flv:
>>> could not find codec parameters
>>>
>>> Any Ideas?
>>>
>>> Am 23.01.19 um 09:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>> Hello Peter,
>>>>
>>>> just have checked the logs
>>>> saved camera stream is 186 bytes only
>>>> seems to be too short to have real data
>>>>
>>>> will try to double-check recording later today ....
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:13, Peter Dähn
>>>> <daehn@vcrp.de <ma...@vcrp.de>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>
>>>> I tried to make a recording in the
>>>> interview room
>>>> (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public).
>>>> Is it broken?
>>>>
>>>> Greetings Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
Re: recording interview room
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Sure :)
Meanwhile I'll do some tests using home laptop :)
Ping me tomorrow :)
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 18:51 Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de wrote:
> unfortunately then I will be out of office... sons swimtraining... :-(
>
> Maybe tomorrow?
>
> Am 23.01.19 um 12:38 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
> Will only be able to join in approx. 1 hour
> Need time to get home :)
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 18:08 Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de wrote:
>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> interview room in public room at next
>>
>> Greetings Peter
>>
>> Am 23.01.19 um 11:02 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>
>> weird enough, just made recording and everything seems to be OK
>>
>> Ubuntu 16.04 Chrome latest
>> Can it be camera issue?
>> I can enter the same room and check if I can see your picture ....
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 17:00, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Nope
>>> All recorded flv files have size of 186 bytes
>>> something weird
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:58, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could you please share longer log?
>>>> (ffmpeg might be outdated ...)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:54, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hmmm... also no luck with longer recordings... restart/using Firefox
>>>>> or Chrome... no luck
>>>>>
>>>>> /opt/openmeetings-4.0.8.r524/webapps/next/streams/1/rec_505_stream_61CDBE07-02B2-8E62-D58B-7A19C50FDB9E_2019_01_23_10_45_28.flv:
>>>>> could not find codec parameters
>>>>>
>>>>> Any Ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 23.01.19 um 09:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Peter,
>>>>>
>>>>> just have checked the logs
>>>>> saved camera stream is 186 bytes only
>>>>> seems to be too short to have real data
>>>>>
>>>>> will try to double-check recording later today ....
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:13, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried to make a recording in the interview room
>>>>>> (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public). Is it broken?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetings Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> WBR
>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: recording interview room
Posted by Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>.
unfortunately then I will be out of office... sons swimtraining... :-(
Maybe tomorrow?
Am 23.01.19 um 12:38 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> Will only be able to join in approx. 1 hour
> Need time to get home :)
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 18:08 Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de
> <ma...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
> interview room in public room at next
>
> Greetings Peter
>
> Am 23.01.19 um 11:02 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>> weird enough, just made recording and everything seems to be OK
>>
>> Ubuntu 16.04 Chrome latest
>> Can it be camera issue?
>> I can enter the same room and check if I can see your picture ....
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 17:00, Maxim Solodovnik
>> <solomax666@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Nope
>> All recorded flv files have size of 186 bytes
>> something weird
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:58, Maxim Solodovnik
>> <solomax666@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Could you please share longer log?
>> (ffmpeg might be outdated ...)
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:54, Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de
>> <ma...@vcrp.de>> wrote:
>>
>> hmmm... also no luck with longer recordings...
>> restart/using Firefox or Chrome... no luck
>>
>> /opt/openmeetings-4.0.8.r524/webapps/next/streams/1/rec_505_stream_61CDBE07-02B2-8E62-D58B-7A19C50FDB9E_2019_01_23_10_45_28.flv:
>> could not find codec parameters
>>
>> Any Ideas?
>>
>> Am 23.01.19 um 09:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>> Hello Peter,
>>>
>>> just have checked the logs
>>> saved camera stream is 186 bytes only
>>> seems to be too short to have real data
>>>
>>> will try to double-check recording later today ....
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:13, Peter Dähn
>>> <daehn@vcrp.de <ma...@vcrp.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>
>>> I tried to make a recording in the interview room
>>> (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public).
>>> Is it broken?
>>>
>>> Greetings Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>
Re: recording interview room
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Will only be able to join in approx. 1 hour
Need time to get home :)
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 18:08 Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> interview room in public room at next
>
> Greetings Peter
>
> Am 23.01.19 um 11:02 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
> weird enough, just made recording and everything seems to be OK
>
> Ubuntu 16.04 Chrome latest
> Can it be camera issue?
> I can enter the same room and check if I can see your picture ....
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 17:00, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Nope
>> All recorded flv files have size of 186 bytes
>> something weird
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:58, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Could you please share longer log?
>>> (ffmpeg might be outdated ...)
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:54, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hmmm... also no luck with longer recordings... restart/using Firefox
>>>> or Chrome... no luck
>>>>
>>>> /opt/openmeetings-4.0.8.r524/webapps/next/streams/1/rec_505_stream_61CDBE07-02B2-8E62-D58B-7A19C50FDB9E_2019_01_23_10_45_28.flv:
>>>> could not find codec parameters
>>>>
>>>> Any Ideas?
>>>>
>>>> Am 23.01.19 um 09:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Peter,
>>>>
>>>> just have checked the logs
>>>> saved camera stream is 186 bytes only
>>>> seems to be too short to have real data
>>>>
>>>> will try to double-check recording later today ....
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:13, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried to make a recording in the interview room
>>>>> (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public). Is it broken?
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
Re: recording interview room
Posted by Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>.
Hi Maxim,
interview room in public room at next
Greetings Peter
Am 23.01.19 um 11:02 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> weird enough, just made recording and everything seems to be OK
>
> Ubuntu 16.04 Chrome latest
> Can it be camera issue?
> I can enter the same room and check if I can see your picture ....
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 17:00, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Nope
> All recorded flv files have size of 186 bytes
> something weird
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:58, Maxim Solodovnik
> <solomax666@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Could you please share longer log?
> (ffmpeg might be outdated ...)
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:54, Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de
> <ma...@vcrp.de>> wrote:
>
> hmmm... also no luck with longer recordings...
> restart/using Firefox or Chrome... no luck
>
> /opt/openmeetings-4.0.8.r524/webapps/next/streams/1/rec_505_stream_61CDBE07-02B2-8E62-D58B-7A19C50FDB9E_2019_01_23_10_45_28.flv:
> could not find codec parameters
>
> Any Ideas?
>
> Am 23.01.19 um 09:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>> Hello Peter,
>>
>> just have checked the logs
>> saved camera stream is 186 bytes only
>> seems to be too short to have real data
>>
>> will try to double-check recording later today ....
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:13, Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de
>> <ma...@vcrp.de>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> I tried to make a recording in the interview room
>> (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public).
>> Is it broken?
>>
>> Greetings Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
Re: recording interview room
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
weird enough, just made recording and everything seems to be OK
Ubuntu 16.04 Chrome latest
Can it be camera issue?
I can enter the same room and check if I can see your picture ....
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 17:00, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nope
> All recorded flv files have size of 186 bytes
> something weird
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:58, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Could you please share longer log?
>> (ffmpeg might be outdated ...)
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:54, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>
>>> hmmm... also no luck with longer recordings... restart/using Firefox or
>>> Chrome... no luck
>>>
>>> /opt/openmeetings-4.0.8.r524/webapps/next/streams/1/rec_505_stream_61CDBE07-02B2-8E62-D58B-7A19C50FDB9E_2019_01_23_10_45_28.flv:
>>> could not find codec parameters
>>>
>>> Any Ideas?
>>>
>>> Am 23.01.19 um 09:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>
>>> Hello Peter,
>>>
>>> just have checked the logs
>>> saved camera stream is 186 bytes only
>>> seems to be too short to have real data
>>>
>>> will try to double-check recording later today ....
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:13, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>
>>>> I tried to make a recording in the interview room
>>>> (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public). Is it broken?
>>>>
>>>> Greetings Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: recording interview room
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Nope
All recorded flv files have size of 186 bytes
something weird
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:58, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could you please share longer log?
> (ffmpeg might be outdated ...)
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:54, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>
>> hmmm... also no luck with longer recordings... restart/using Firefox or
>> Chrome... no luck
>>
>> /opt/openmeetings-4.0.8.r524/webapps/next/streams/1/rec_505_stream_61CDBE07-02B2-8E62-D58B-7A19C50FDB9E_2019_01_23_10_45_28.flv:
>> could not find codec parameters
>>
>> Any Ideas?
>>
>> Am 23.01.19 um 09:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>
>> Hello Peter,
>>
>> just have checked the logs
>> saved camera stream is 186 bytes only
>> seems to be too short to have real data
>>
>> will try to double-check recording later today ....
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:13, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>
>>> I tried to make a recording in the interview room
>>> (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public). Is it broken?
>>>
>>> Greetings Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: recording interview room
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Could you please share longer log?
(ffmpeg might be outdated ...)
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:54, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
> hmmm... also no luck with longer recordings... restart/using Firefox or
> Chrome... no luck
>
> /opt/openmeetings-4.0.8.r524/webapps/next/streams/1/rec_505_stream_61CDBE07-02B2-8E62-D58B-7A19C50FDB9E_2019_01_23_10_45_28.flv:
> could not find codec parameters
>
> Any Ideas?
>
> Am 23.01.19 um 09:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
> Hello Peter,
>
> just have checked the logs
> saved camera stream is 186 bytes only
> seems to be too short to have real data
>
> will try to double-check recording later today ....
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:13, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> I tried to make a recording in the interview room
>> (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public). Is it broken?
>>
>> Greetings Peter
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: recording interview room
Posted by Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>.
hmmm... also no luck with longer recordings... restart/using Firefox or
Chrome... no luck
/opt/openmeetings-4.0.8.r524/webapps/next/streams/1/rec_505_stream_61CDBE07-02B2-8E62-D58B-7A19C50FDB9E_2019_01_23_10_45_28.flv:
could not find codec parameters
Any Ideas?
Am 23.01.19 um 09:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> Hello Peter,
>
> just have checked the logs
> saved camera stream is 186 bytes only
> seems to be too short to have real data
>
> will try to double-check recording later today ....
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:13, Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de
> <ma...@vcrp.de>> wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
> I tried to make a recording in the interview room
> (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public). Is it broken?
>
> Greetings Peter
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
Re: recording interview room
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Hello Peter,
just have checked the logs
saved camera stream is 186 bytes only
seems to be too short to have real data
will try to double-check recording later today ....
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:13, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> I tried to make a recording in the interview room
> (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public). Is it broken?
>
> Greetings Peter
>
>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
recording interview room
Posted by Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>.
Hi Maxim,
I tried to make a recording in the interview room
(https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/#rooms/public). Is it broken?
Greetings Peter
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Daniel Baker <in...@collisiondetection.biz>.
Yeah can wait for SIP but will need 5 up and running soon.
I will test 5 and provide feedback.
On 1/23/2019 2:57 PM, Peter Dähn wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> I think this time testing is more important than other times. An
> Installation "as is" would be great. All could test the same system.
> Afterwards everybody could test his/her setup.
>
> Probably community could help with the documentation part.
>
> So to put it on next is a good idea. I could live without SIP and
> external video at release time.
>
> Greeting Peter
>
> Am 23.01.19 um 03:40 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>> Hello Aaron,
>>
>> I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
>> And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down, some
>> network problems etc.
>>
>> You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current version
>> (functionality/usability/performance)
>> I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates regular
>> (this machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
>>
>> Another huge area is documentation
>>
>> 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
>>
>> currently unimplemented:
>> 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before release
>> 2) external video in the room
>> 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aaron.hepp@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> With Adobe announcing their ending support for flash in 2020 and
>> most major browsers (expect Firefox) starting to block and
>> require acceptance to run flash each time a page is loaded with
>> it; was wondering if there was a cut off date for advancements in
>> Version 4 and the migration to version 5?
>>
>> I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a few bugs
>> but understandable since it was not the main development platform.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>.
Hi Maxim,
I think this time testing is more important than other times. An
Installation "as is" would be great. All could test the same system.
Afterwards everybody could test his/her setup.
Probably community could help with the documentation part.
So to put it on next is a good idea. I could live without SIP and
external video at release time.
Greeting Peter
Am 23.01.19 um 03:40 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> Hello Aaron,
>
> I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
> And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down, some
> network problems etc.
>
> You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current version
> (functionality/usability/performance)
> I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates regular (this
> machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
>
> Another huge area is documentation
>
> 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
>
> currently unimplemented:
> 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before release
> 2) external video in the room
> 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
>
> WDYT?
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aaron.hepp@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> With Adobe announcing their ending support for flash in 2020 and
> most major browsers (expect Firefox) starting to block and require
> acceptance to run flash each time a page is loaded with it; was
> wondering if there was a cut off date for advancements in Version
> 4 and the migration to version 5?
>
> I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a few bugs
> but understandable since it was not the main development platform.
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Sorry for keeping silence Alvaro :(
Glad everything is OK :)
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 20:15, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Maxim,
>
> I could not find your script for OM 5.0.0 in other threads,
> but 've been able to modify the one i had and now it is possible
> restart without problems.
>
> The script was not for me, but for the community of OpenMeetings through
> the installation tutorials.
>
> Thank you in any way.
>
> Alvaro
>
>
> .........................................................
>
>
>
>
> El vie, 25-01-2019 a las 18:30 +0100, Alvaro escribió:
>
>
> So, could you please appoint me to the thread
> where is the script?
>
> Thanks
>
> .............
>
> El vie, 25-01-2019 a las 23:23 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
>
> my script also performs restart :)
> (according to my tests :)))
>
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 22:47, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok. My question is a script about "restart", because
> when i restart OM 5.0.0 with the scripts that i have
> become trebol about the system (java?) and no restart.
>
>
> ..................
>
>
> El vie, 25-01-2019 a las 22:29 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
>
> Hello Alvaro I just have posted start/stop script to other thread
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 23:26, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Maxim have you a script to run Tomcat-OM-5.0.0?
>
> .................
>
> El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 17:22 +0100, Alvaro escribió:
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> Am testing OM 5.0.0 - 2695
>
> Will test demo (om-next) too.
>
> Alvaro
>
> .....................................
>
>
> El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 23:05 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
>
> Actually the idea was to
>
> 1) to do more testing on more powerful demo (om-next)
> 2) release 5.0.0-M1 == pre-production version, so users can test
> Milestone1 (and not just snapshot)
> .... iterate M2, M3 etc.
> X) release 5.0.0
>
> 4.0.x will be released as well
> This is the only version for IE users (and it seems for Edge users also
> ....)
> So it will be maintained
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 21:50, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Am not sure if i understand the question.
>
> Go from OM 4.0.7 to OM 5.0 release?
> If is so, i don't find right to do it when you, Maxim,
> said that OM 5.0 have not yet all features ok.
>
> We have one more year with Adobe flash on. So
> is time to put ready OM 5.0.
> Offer to the users a unfinished release, without
> necessity, would be not very serious.
>
> It is time to make it rightly.
>
> Some users, me also, can test OM 5.0 and make
> jira abou it with issues found.
>
> Patience, yet is time.
>
> Alvaro
>
>
>
>
> El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 09:40 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
>
> Hello Aaron,
>
> I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
> And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down, some network
> problems etc.
>
> You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current version
> (functionality/usability/performance)
> I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates regular (this
> machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
>
> Another huge area is documentation
>
> 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
>
> currently unimplemented:
> 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before release
> 2) external video in the room
> 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
>
> WDYT?
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With Adobe announcing their ending support for flash in 2020 and most
> major browsers (expect Firefox) starting to block and require acceptance to
> run flash each time a page is loaded with it; was wondering if there was a
> cut off date for advancements in Version 4 and the migration to version 5?
>
> I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a few bugs but
> understandable since it was not the main development platform.
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com>.
Hello Maxim,
I could not find your script for OM 5.0.0 in other threads,but 've been
able to modify the one i had and now it is possiblerestart without
problems.
The script was not for me, but for the community of OpenMeetings
throughthe installation tutorials.
Thank you in any way.
Alvaro
.........................................................
El vie, 25-01-2019 a las 18:30 +0100, Alvaro escribió:
> So, could you please appoint me to the threadwhere is the script?
> Thanks
> .............
> El vie, 25-01-2019 a las 23:23 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> > my script also performs restart :) (according to my tests :)))
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 22:47, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Ok. My question is a script about "restart", becausewhen i
> > > restart OM 5.0.0 with the scripts that i havebecome trebol about
> > > the system (java?) and no restart.
> > >
> > > ..................
> > >
> > > El vie, 25-01-2019 a las 22:29 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> > > > Hello Alvaro I just have posted start/stop script to other
> > > > thread
> > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 23:26, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Maxim have you a script to run Tomcat-OM-5.0.0?
> > > > > .................
> > > > > El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 17:22 +0100, Alvaro escribió:
> > > > > > Ok, thanks.
> > > > > > Am testing OM 5.0.0 - 2695
> > > > > > Will test demo (om-next) too.
> > > > > > Alvaro
> > > > > > .....................................
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 23:05 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik
> > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > > > Actually the idea was to
> > > > > > > 1) to do more testing on more powerful demo (om-next)
> > > > > > > 2) release 5.0.0-M1 == pre-production version, so users
> > > > > > > can test Milestone1 (and not just snapshot)
> > > > > > > .... iterate M2, M3 etc.
> > > > > > > X) release 5.0.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 4.0.x will be released as well
> > > > > > > This is the only version for IE users (and it seems for
> > > > > > > Edge users also ....)
> > > > > > > So it will be maintained
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 21:50, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Am not sure if i understand the question.
> > > > > > > > Go from OM 4.0.7 to OM 5.0 release?If is so, i don't
> > > > > > > > find right to do it when you, Maxim,said that OM 5.0
> > > > > > > > have not yet all features ok.
> > > > > > > > We have one more year with Adobe flash on. Sois time to
> > > > > > > > put ready OM 5.0.Offer to the users a unfinished
> > > > > > > > release, withoutnecessity, would be not very serious.
> > > > > > > > It is time to make it rightly.
> > > > > > > > Some users, me also, can test OM 5.0 and makejira abou
> > > > > > > > it with issues found.
> > > > > > > > Patience, yet is time.
> > > > > > > > Alvaro
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 09:40 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik
> > > > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > > > > > Hello Aaron,
> > > > > > > > > I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording
> > > > > > > > > support
> > > > > > > > > And trying to address all corner cases: media server
> > > > > > > > > up/down, some network problems etc.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with
> > > > > > > > > current version (functionality/usability/performance)
> > > > > > > > > I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made
> > > > > > > > > updates regular (this machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Another huge area is documentation
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > currently unimplemented:
> > > > > > > > > 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be
> > > > > > > > > done before release
> > > > > > > > > 2) external video in the room
> > > > > > > > > 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aaron.hepp@
> > > > > > > > > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > With Adobe announcing their
> > > > > > > > > > ending support for flash in 2020 and most
> > > > > > > > > > major browsers (expect
> > > > > > > > > > Firefox) starting to block and require
> > > > > > > > > > acceptance to run flash
> > > > > > > > > > each time a page is loaded with it; was
> > > > > > > > > > wondering if there was a
> > > > > > > > > > cut off date for advancements in Version 4
> > > > > > > > > > and the migration to
> > > > > > > > > > version 5?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I played around with version 5 and there
> > > > > > > > > > seems to be a few bugs
> > > > > > > > > > but understandable since it was not the
> > > > > > > > > > main development
> > > > > > > > > > platform.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
Re: Docker image pulls down 4.6 instead of 4.7
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Just have tried, everything seems to be OK [1]:
Could you please try to perform docker clean-up:
docker rm $(docker ps -a -q)
docker rmi $(docker images -q)
[1]
################################################################################
# Openmeetings is up
#
# 4.0.7 2bc5acd 2018-12-28T17:10:29Z
#
# and ready to use
#
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 21:13, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just have checked here:
> https://bintray.com/beta/#/openmeetings/images/server
> Version seems to be 4.0.7
>
> will try to clean the cache and check logs
>
> According to 5.0.0, it will be published as soon as it will be released
> Having 2 versions is not very good idea due to huge size of the image :(
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 20:48, Daniel Baker <in...@collisiondetection.biz>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> When I tried :
>>
>> docker run -i --rm --name om-server -p 5080:5080 -p 1935:1935 openmeetings-docker-images.bintray.io/server:latest
>>
>>
>> 4.6 came down.
>>
>>
>> I see you changed the docker file to pull 4.7 so I should see 4.7 ?
>>
>> A docker image with 5 would be great too.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon> Virus-free.
>> www.avast.com
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>
>> <#m_-8372098486582579288_m_6193824262872680039_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: Docker image pulls down 4.6 instead of 4.7
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Just have checked here:
https://bintray.com/beta/#/openmeetings/images/server
Version seems to be 4.0.7
will try to clean the cache and check logs
According to 5.0.0, it will be published as soon as it will be released
Having 2 versions is not very good idea due to huge size of the image :(
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 20:48, Daniel Baker <in...@collisiondetection.biz>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> When I tried :
>
> docker run -i --rm --name om-server -p 5080:5080 -p 1935:1935 openmeetings-docker-images.bintray.io/server:latest
>
>
> 4.6 came down.
>
>
> I see you changed the docker file to pull 4.7 so I should see 4.7 ?
>
> A docker image with 5 would be great too.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon> Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>
> <#m_6193824262872680039_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Docker image pulls down 4.6 instead of 4.7
Posted by Daniel Baker <in...@collisiondetection.biz>.
Hi,
When I tried :
|docker run -i --rm --name om-server -p 5080:5080 -p 1935:1935
openmeetings-docker-images.bintray.io/server:latest 4.6 came down. I see
you changed the docker file to pull 4.7 so I should see 4.7 ? A docker
image with 5 would be great too. Thanks, Dan |
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com>.
So, could you please appoint me to the threadwhere is the script?
Thanks
.............
El vie, 25-01-2019 a las 23:23 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> my script also performs restart :) (according to my tests :)))
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 22:47, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ok. My question is a script about "restart", becausewhen i restart
> > OM 5.0.0 with the scripts that i havebecome trebol about the system
> > (java?) and no restart.
> >
> > ..................
> >
> > El vie, 25-01-2019 a las 22:29 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> > > Hello Alvaro I just have posted start/stop script to other thread
> > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 23:26, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Maxim have you a script to run Tomcat-OM-5.0.0?
> > > > .................
> > > > El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 17:22 +0100, Alvaro escribió:
> > > > > Ok, thanks.
> > > > > Am testing OM 5.0.0 - 2695
> > > > > Will test demo (om-next) too.
> > > > > Alvaro
> > > > > .....................................
> > > > >
> > > > > El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 23:05 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik
> > > > > escribió:
> > > > > > Actually the idea was to
> > > > > > 1) to do more testing on more powerful demo (om-next)
> > > > > > 2) release 5.0.0-M1 == pre-production version, so users can
> > > > > > test Milestone1 (and not just snapshot)
> > > > > > .... iterate M2, M3 etc.
> > > > > > X) release 5.0.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 4.0.x will be released as well
> > > > > > This is the only version for IE users (and it seems for
> > > > > > Edge users also ....)
> > > > > > So it will be maintained
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 21:50, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Am not sure if i understand the question.
> > > > > > > Go from OM 4.0.7 to OM 5.0 release?If is so, i don't find
> > > > > > > right to do it when you, Maxim,said that OM 5.0 have not
> > > > > > > yet all features ok.
> > > > > > > We have one more year with Adobe flash on. Sois time to
> > > > > > > put ready OM 5.0.Offer to the users a unfinished release,
> > > > > > > withoutnecessity, would be not very serious.
> > > > > > > It is time to make it rightly.
> > > > > > > Some users, me also, can test OM 5.0 and makejira abou it
> > > > > > > with issues found.
> > > > > > > Patience, yet is time.
> > > > > > > Alvaro
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 09:40 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik
> > > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > > > > Hello Aaron,
> > > > > > > > I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording
> > > > > > > > support
> > > > > > > > And trying to address all corner cases: media server
> > > > > > > > up/down, some network problems etc.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with
> > > > > > > > current version (functionality/usability/performance)
> > > > > > > > I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made
> > > > > > > > updates regular (this machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Another huge area is documentation
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > currently unimplemented:
> > > > > > > > 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done
> > > > > > > > before release
> > > > > > > > 2) external video in the room
> > > > > > > > 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aaron.hepp@gm
> > > > > > > > ail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > With Adobe announcing their
> > > > > > > > > ending support for flash in 2020 and most
> > > > > > > > > major browsers (expect
> > > > > > > > > Firefox) starting to block and require
> > > > > > > > > acceptance to run flash
> > > > > > > > > each time a page is loaded with it; was
> > > > > > > > > wondering if there was a
> > > > > > > > > cut off date for advancements in Version 4
> > > > > > > > > and the migration to
> > > > > > > > > version 5?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I played around with version 5 and there
> > > > > > > > > seems to be a few bugs
> > > > > > > > > but understandable since it was not the main
> > > > > > > > > development
> > > > > > > > > platform.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
my script also performs restart :)
(according to my tests :)))
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 22:47, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok. My question is a script about "restart", because
> when i restart OM 5.0.0 with the scripts that i have
> become trebol about the system (java?) and no restart.
>
>
> ..................
>
>
> El vie, 25-01-2019 a las 22:29 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
>
> Hello Alvaro I just have posted start/stop script to other thread
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 23:26, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Maxim have you a script to run Tomcat-OM-5.0.0?
>
> .................
>
> El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 17:22 +0100, Alvaro escribió:
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> Am testing OM 5.0.0 - 2695
>
> Will test demo (om-next) too.
>
> Alvaro
>
> .....................................
>
>
> El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 23:05 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
>
> Actually the idea was to
>
> 1) to do more testing on more powerful demo (om-next)
> 2) release 5.0.0-M1 == pre-production version, so users can test
> Milestone1 (and not just snapshot)
> .... iterate M2, M3 etc.
> X) release 5.0.0
>
> 4.0.x will be released as well
> This is the only version for IE users (and it seems for Edge users also
> ....)
> So it will be maintained
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 21:50, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Am not sure if i understand the question.
>
> Go from OM 4.0.7 to OM 5.0 release?
> If is so, i don't find right to do it when you, Maxim,
> said that OM 5.0 have not yet all features ok.
>
> We have one more year with Adobe flash on. So
> is time to put ready OM 5.0.
> Offer to the users a unfinished release, without
> necessity, would be not very serious.
>
> It is time to make it rightly.
>
> Some users, me also, can test OM 5.0 and make
> jira abou it with issues found.
>
> Patience, yet is time.
>
> Alvaro
>
>
>
>
> El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 09:40 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
>
> Hello Aaron,
>
> I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
> And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down, some network
> problems etc.
>
> You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current version
> (functionality/usability/performance)
> I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates regular (this
> machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
>
> Another huge area is documentation
>
> 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
>
> currently unimplemented:
> 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before release
> 2) external video in the room
> 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
>
> WDYT?
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With Adobe announcing their ending support for flash in 2020 and most
> major browsers (expect Firefox) starting to block and require acceptance to
> run flash each time a page is loaded with it; was wondering if there was a
> cut off date for advancements in Version 4 and the migration to version 5?
>
> I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a few bugs but
> understandable since it was not the main development platform.
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com>.
Ok. My question is a script about "restart", becausewhen i restart OM
5.0.0 with the scripts that i havebecome trebol about the system
(java?) and no restart.
..................
El vie, 25-01-2019 a las 22:29 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> Hello Alvaro I just have posted start/stop script to other thread
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 23:26, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maxim have you a script to run Tomcat-OM-5.0.0?
> > .................
> > El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 17:22 +0100, Alvaro escribió:
> > > Ok, thanks.
> > > Am testing OM 5.0.0 - 2695
> > > Will test demo (om-next) too.
> > > Alvaro
> > > .....................................
> > >
> > > El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 23:05 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> > > > Actually the idea was to
> > > > 1) to do more testing on more powerful demo (om-next)
> > > > 2) release 5.0.0-M1 == pre-production version, so users can
> > > > test Milestone1 (and not just snapshot)
> > > > .... iterate M2, M3 etc.
> > > > X) release 5.0.0
> > > >
> > > > 4.0.x will be released as well
> > > > This is the only version for IE users (and it seems for Edge
> > > > users also ....)
> > > > So it will be maintained
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 21:50, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Am not sure if i understand the question.
> > > > > Go from OM 4.0.7 to OM 5.0 release?If is so, i don't find
> > > > > right to do it when you, Maxim,said that OM 5.0 have not yet
> > > > > all features ok.
> > > > > We have one more year with Adobe flash on. Sois time to put
> > > > > ready OM 5.0.Offer to the users a unfinished release,
> > > > > withoutnecessity, would be not very serious.
> > > > > It is time to make it rightly.
> > > > > Some users, me also, can test OM 5.0 and makejira abou it
> > > > > with issues found.
> > > > > Patience, yet is time.
> > > > > Alvaro
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 09:40 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik
> > > > > escribió:
> > > > > > Hello Aaron,
> > > > > > I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
> > > > > > And trying to address all corner cases: media server
> > > > > > up/down, some network problems etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with
> > > > > > current version (functionality/usability/performance)
> > > > > > I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates
> > > > > > regular (this machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another huge area is documentation
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
> > > > > >
> > > > > > currently unimplemented:
> > > > > > 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done
> > > > > > before release
> > > > > > 2) external video in the room
> > > > > > 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
> > > > > >
> > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aaron.hepp@gmail.
> > > > > > com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > With Adobe announcing their
> > > > > > > ending support for flash in 2020 and most major
> > > > > > > browsers (expect
> > > > > > > Firefox) starting to block and require acceptance
> > > > > > > to run flash
> > > > > > > each time a page is loaded with it; was wondering
> > > > > > > if there was a
> > > > > > > cut off date for advancements in Version 4 and
> > > > > > > the migration to
> > > > > > > version 5?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I played around with version 5 and there seems to
> > > > > > > be a few bugs
> > > > > > > but understandable since it was not the main
> > > > > > > development
> > > > > > > platform.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Hello Alvaro I just have posted start/stop script to other thread
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 23:26, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maxim have you a script to run Tomcat-OM-5.0.0?
>
> .................
>
> El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 17:22 +0100, Alvaro escribió:
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> Am testing OM 5.0.0 - 2695
>
> Will test demo (om-next) too.
>
> Alvaro
>
> .....................................
>
>
> El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 23:05 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
>
> Actually the idea was to
>
> 1) to do more testing on more powerful demo (om-next)
> 2) release 5.0.0-M1 == pre-production version, so users can test
> Milestone1 (and not just snapshot)
> .... iterate M2, M3 etc.
> X) release 5.0.0
>
> 4.0.x will be released as well
> This is the only version for IE users (and it seems for Edge users also
> ....)
> So it will be maintained
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 21:50, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Am not sure if i understand the question.
>
> Go from OM 4.0.7 to OM 5.0 release?
> If is so, i don't find right to do it when you, Maxim,
> said that OM 5.0 have not yet all features ok.
>
> We have one more year with Adobe flash on. So
> is time to put ready OM 5.0.
> Offer to the users a unfinished release, without
> necessity, would be not very serious.
>
> It is time to make it rightly.
>
> Some users, me also, can test OM 5.0 and make
> jira abou it with issues found.
>
> Patience, yet is time.
>
> Alvaro
>
>
>
>
> El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 09:40 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
>
> Hello Aaron,
>
> I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
> And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down, some network
> problems etc.
>
> You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current version
> (functionality/usability/performance)
> I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates regular (this
> machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
>
> Another huge area is documentation
>
> 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
>
> currently unimplemented:
> 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before release
> 2) external video in the room
> 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
>
> WDYT?
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With Adobe announcing their ending support for flash in 2020 and most
> major browsers (expect Firefox) starting to block and require acceptance to
> run flash each time a page is loaded with it; was wondering if there was a
> cut off date for advancements in Version 4 and the migration to version 5?
>
> I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a few bugs but
> understandable since it was not the main development platform.
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com>.
Maxim have you a script to run Tomcat-OM-5.0.0?
.................
El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 17:22 +0100, Alvaro escribió:
> Ok, thanks.
> Am testing OM 5.0.0 - 2695
> Will test demo (om-next) too.
> Alvaro
> .....................................
>
> El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 23:05 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> > Actually the idea was to
> > 1) to do more testing on more powerful demo (om-next)
> > 2) release 5.0.0-M1 == pre-production version, so users can test
> > Milestone1 (and not just snapshot)
> > .... iterate M2, M3 etc.
> > X) release 5.0.0
> >
> > 4.0.x will be released as well
> > This is the only version for IE users (and it seems for Edge users
> > also ....)
> > So it will be maintained
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 21:50, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Am not sure if i understand the question.
> > > Go from OM 4.0.7 to OM 5.0 release?If is so, i don't find right
> > > to do it when you, Maxim,said that OM 5.0 have not yet all
> > > features ok.
> > > We have one more year with Adobe flash on. Sois time to put ready
> > > OM 5.0.Offer to the users a unfinished release, withoutnecessity,
> > > would be not very serious.
> > > It is time to make it rightly.
> > > Some users, me also, can test OM 5.0 and makejira abou it with
> > > issues found.
> > > Patience, yet is time.
> > > Alvaro
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 09:40 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> > > > Hello Aaron,
> > > > I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
> > > > And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down,
> > > > some network problems etc.
> > > >
> > > > You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current
> > > > version (functionality/usability/performance)
> > > > I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates
> > > > regular (this machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
> > > >
> > > > Another huge area is documentation
> > > >
> > > > 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
> > > >
> > > > currently unimplemented:
> > > > 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before
> > > > release
> > > > 2) external video in the room
> > > > 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
> > > >
> > > > WDYT?
> > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > With Adobe announcing their
> > > > > ending support for flash in 2020 and most major
> > > > > browsers (expect
> > > > > Firefox) starting to block and require acceptance to
> > > > > run flash
> > > > > each time a page is loaded with it; was wondering if
> > > > > there was a
> > > > > cut off date for advancements in Version 4 and the
> > > > > migration to
> > > > > version 5?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I played around with version 5 and there seems to be
> > > > > a few bugs
> > > > > but understandable since it was not the main
> > > > > development
> > > > > platform.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com>.
Ok, thanks.
Am testing OM 5.0.0 - 2695
Will test demo (om-next) too.
Alvaro
.....................................
El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 23:05 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> Actually the idea was to
> 1) to do more testing on more powerful demo (om-next)
> 2) release 5.0.0-M1 == pre-production version, so users can test
> Milestone1 (and not just snapshot)
> .... iterate M2, M3 etc.
> X) release 5.0.0
>
> 4.0.x will be released as well
> This is the only version for IE users (and it seems for Edge users
> also ....)
> So it will be maintained
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 21:50, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Am not sure if i understand the question.
> > Go from OM 4.0.7 to OM 5.0 release?If is so, i don't find right to
> > do it when you, Maxim,said that OM 5.0 have not yet all features
> > ok.
> > We have one more year with Adobe flash on. Sois time to put ready
> > OM 5.0.Offer to the users a unfinished release, withoutnecessity,
> > would be not very serious.
> > It is time to make it rightly.
> > Some users, me also, can test OM 5.0 and makejira abou it with
> > issues found.
> > Patience, yet is time.
> > Alvaro
> >
> >
> >
> > El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 09:40 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> > > Hello Aaron,
> > > I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
> > > And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down,
> > > some network problems etc.
> > >
> > > You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current
> > > version (functionality/usability/performance)
> > > I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates regular
> > > (this machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
> > >
> > > Another huge area is documentation
> > >
> > > 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
> > >
> > > currently unimplemented:
> > > 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before
> > > release
> > > 2) external video in the room
> > > 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > With Adobe announcing their
> > > > ending support for flash in 2020 and most major
> > > > browsers (expect
> > > > Firefox) starting to block and require acceptance to
> > > > run flash
> > > > each time a page is loaded with it; was wondering if
> > > > there was a
> > > > cut off date for advancements in Version 4 and the
> > > > migration to
> > > > version 5?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a
> > > > few bugs
> > > > but understandable since it was not the main
> > > > development
> > > > platform.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Actually the idea was to
1) to do more testing on more powerful demo (om-next)
2) release 5.0.0-M1 == pre-production version, so users can test Milestone1
(and not just snapshot)
.... iterate M2, M3 etc.
X) release 5.0.0
4.0.x will be released as well
This is the only version for IE users (and it seems for Edge users also
....)
So it will be maintained
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 21:50, Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Am not sure if i understand the question.
>
> Go from OM 4.0.7 to OM 5.0 release?
> If is so, i don't find right to do it when you, Maxim,
> said that OM 5.0 have not yet all features ok.
>
> We have one more year with Adobe flash on. So
> is time to put ready OM 5.0.
> Offer to the users a unfinished release, without
> necessity, would be not very serious.
>
> It is time to make it rightly.
>
> Some users, me also, can test OM 5.0 and make
> jira abou it with issues found.
>
> Patience, yet is time.
>
> Alvaro
>
>
>
>
> El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 09:40 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
>
> Hello Aaron,
>
> I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
> And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down, some network
> problems etc.
>
> You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current version
> (functionality/usability/performance)
> I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates regular (this
> machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
>
> Another huge area is documentation
>
> 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
>
> currently unimplemented:
> 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before release
> 2) external video in the room
> 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
>
> WDYT?
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With Adobe announcing their ending support for flash in 2020 and most
> major browsers (expect Firefox) starting to block and require acceptance to
> run flash each time a page is loaded with it; was wondering if there was a
> cut off date for advancements in Version 4 and the migration to version 5?
>
> I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a few bugs but
> understandable since it was not the main development platform.
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Alvaro <zu...@gmail.com>.
Am not sure if i understand the question.
Go from OM 4.0.7 to OM 5.0 release?If is so, i don't find right to do
it when you, Maxim,said that OM 5.0 have not yet all features ok.
We have one more year with Adobe flash on. Sois time to put ready OM
5.0.Offer to the users a unfinished release, withoutnecessity, would be
not very serious.
It is time to make it rightly.
Some users, me also, can test OM 5.0 and makejira abou it with issues
found.
Patience, yet is time.
Alvaro
El mié, 23-01-2019 a las 09:40 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> Hello Aaron,
> I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
> And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down, some
> network problems etc.
>
> You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current version
> (functionality/usability/performance)
> I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates regular
> (this machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
>
> Another huge area is documentation
>
> 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
>
> currently unimplemented:
> 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before
> release
> 2) external video in the room
> 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
>
> WDYT?
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > With Adobe announcing their
> > ending support for flash in 2020 and most major browsers
> > (expect
> > Firefox) starting to block and require acceptance to run
> > flash
> > each time a page is loaded with it; was wondering if there
> > was a
> > cut off date for advancements in Version 4 and the
> > migration to
> > version 5?
> >
> >
> >
> > I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a few
> > bugs
> > but understandable since it was not the main development
> > platform.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Wasn't aware of this one,
will try to investigate this week
Thanks for the report! :)
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 17:26, Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That will be fine, I have an extra VPS that can be stood up and used for
> testing. I would assume you would like issue/bugs reported via Jira?
>
> Currently the only issue I am finding with current functionality in 5.0 is
> the mic/audio functionality. Cam/Video works and broadcasts, but when you
> go to broadcast your mic/audio you get: "Multimedia server is inaccessible"
> (see attached). Didn't know if this was known already or not.
>
> On 1/22/19 9:40 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> Hello Aaron,
>
> I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
> And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down, some network
> problems etc.
>
> You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current version
> (functionality/usability/performance)
> I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates regular (this
> machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
>
> Another huge area is documentation
>
> 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
>
> currently unimplemented:
> 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before release
> 2) external video in the room
> 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
>
> WDYT?
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> With Adobe announcing their ending support for flash in 2020 and most
>> major browsers (expect Firefox) starting to block and require acceptance to
>> run flash each time a page is loaded with it; was wondering if there was a
>> cut off date for advancements in Version 4 and the migration to version 5?
>>
>> I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a few bugs but
>> understandable since it was not the main development platform.
>>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com>.
That will be fine, I have an extra VPS that can be stood up and used for
testing. I would assume you would like issue/bugs reported via Jira?
Currently the only issue I am finding with current functionality in 5.0
is the mic/audio functionality. Cam/Video works and broadcasts, but
when you go to broadcast your mic/audio you get: "Multimedia server is
inaccessible" (see attached). Didn't know if this was known already or not.
On 1/22/19 9:40 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> Hello Aaron,
>
> I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
> And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down, some
> network problems etc.
>
> You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current version
> (functionality/usability/performance)
> I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates regular (this
> machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
>
> Another huge area is documentation
>
> 5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
>
> currently unimplemented:
> 1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before release
> 2) external video in the room
> 3) SIP/Asterisk integration
>
> WDYT?
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aaron.hepp@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> With Adobe announcing their ending support for flash in 2020 and
> most major browsers (expect Firefox) starting to block and require
> acceptance to run flash each time a page is loaded with it; was
> wondering if there was a cut off date for advancements in Version
> 4 and the migration to version 5?
>
> I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a few bugs
> but understandable since it was not the main development platform.
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
Re: Development move to 5.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Hello Aaron,
I'm currently working on screen-sharing/recording support
And trying to address all corner cases: media server up/down, some network
problems etc.
You, and all users, can help by reporting issues with current version
(functionality/usability/performance)
I can replace "next" version with 5.0.0 and made updates regular (this
machine has more CPU/RAM etc.)
Another huge area is documentation
5.0.0-M1 can be released without all features
currently unimplemented:
1) screen-sharing/recording - in progress, must be done before release
2) external video in the room
3) SIP/Asterisk integration
WDYT?
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:16, Aaron Hepp <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With Adobe announcing their ending support for flash in 2020 and most
> major browsers (expect Firefox) starting to block and require acceptance to
> run flash each time a page is loaded with it; was wondering if there was a
> cut off date for advancements in Version 4 and the migration to version 5?
>
> I played around with version 5 and there seems to be a few bugs but
> understandable since it was not the main development platform.
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax