You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@perl.apache.org by Fred Moyer <fr...@taperfriendlymusic.org> on 2008/02/13 19:16:19 UTC
[RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Reload-0.10-RC4
Greetings,
I've applied Steve's suggested changes to AddModule mod_perl.c if PERL is
defined, this should take care of mod_perl.c not being listed in the
module list under windows. Hoping this is the candidate that makes it out
of the nest :)
It's located here - please take it for a spin if you have a chance.
http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Reload-0.10-RC4.tar.gz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Reload-0.10-RC4
Posted by Fred Moyer <fr...@taperfriendlymusic.org>.
[my webmail client didn't cc dev@perl.apache.org so including original
response here.
But if you are reading this you should fast forward to RC5.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/96421
Else here is the original response.]
__DATA__
___________________________________________________
> Fred Moyer wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I've applied Steve's suggested changes to AddModule mod_perl.c if
>> PERL is defined, this should take care of mod_perl.c not being listed
>> in the module list under windows. Hoping this is the candidate that
>> makes it out of the nest :)
>
> Sorry, no good here: it still fails all three reload.t tests.
>
> The PERL stuff that you've added is only half the story: as my earlier
> mail mentioned (see
> http://marc.info/?l=apache-modperl-dev&m=120159758620244&w=2) you also
> have to start up apache.exe with "-D PERL" on the command-line for those
> changes to have any effect! I'm not sure where that extra command-line
> argument needs to get specified, though. I meant to look into sometime
> but still haven't found time.
Ok, thanks for the heads up, flying a bit blind here on just *nix.
> Also, the all.t that I saw you committed in r620695 isn't in the tarball
> (hence the tests failed rather than skipped). Did you mean it to be?
And also trying to do too many things at once :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Reload-0.10-RC4
Posted by Steve Hay <St...@planit.com>.
Fred Moyer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've applied Steve's suggested changes to AddModule mod_perl.c if
> PERL is defined, this should take care of mod_perl.c not being listed
> in the module list under windows. Hoping this is the candidate that
> makes it out of the nest :)
Sorry, no good here: it still fails all three reload.t tests.
The PERL stuff that you've added is only half the story: as my earlier
mail mentioned (see
http://marc.info/?l=apache-modperl-dev&m=120159758620244&w=2) you also
have to start up apache.exe with "-D PERL" on the command-line for those
changes to have any effect! I'm not sure where that extra command-line
argument needs to get specified, though. I meant to look into sometime
but still haven't found time.
Also, the all.t that I saw you committed in r620695 isn't in the tarball
(hence the tests failed rather than skipped). Did you mean it to be?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org