You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@asterixdb.apache.org by "Michael J. Carey (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/03/25 17:29:41 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (ASTERIXDB-1858) Tiny tweak for new JSON
formatting (display) option?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15941802#comment-15941802 ]
Michael J. Carey edited comment on ASTERIXDB-1858 at 3/25/17 5:29 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It might also be cool, if it were easy, to have second-and-below level fields unopened by default when the results first come back? Or not - I'm actually not sure about this - maybe ignore this comment for now but see how folks feel. (I think in retrospect I like it better as it is now, where it comes out nested. This comment was in response to looking at the metadata this way, but I like it better when looking at data to see the nesting. :-) )
was (Author: dtabass):
It might also be cool, if it were easy, to have second-and-below level fields unopened by default when the results first come back?
> Tiny tweak for new JSON formatting (display) option?
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERIXDB-1858
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1858
> Project: Apache AsterixDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael J. Carey
> Assignee: Xikui Wang
> Priority: Minor
>
> Could the UI use term "fields" instead of "items" there? I think that would be clearer. (The first thing "item" binds to for me is "record" - whereas here it is referring to how many fields.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)