You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jmeter-dev@jakarta.apache.org by Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> on 2005/03/04 16:41:51 UTC
[Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
i was chatting with Mike and thought maybe we should try to shoot for
a new release in 2 weeks?
this weekend I plan to go over the docs and wiki.
peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com>.
I'm just complaining :)
but I am making a PDF. wiki is still worth while, just takes a bit to
get used to it.
peter
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 23:26:08 +0000, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 15:50:16 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I just spent about 30 minutes trying to edit wiki pages and boy it's a
> > pain.
>
> No worse than HTML, surely, once you know the syntax?
> But there are HTML-aware editors...
>
> > Rather than attempt to update the Jmeter Eclipse howto, I'm
> > gonna make a PDF instead.
>
> I'm not saying you should not do this - in fact a PDF would be very
> useful - but it does mean that the document cannot then be updated by
> just anyone.
>
> Not sure there's an ideal solution here...
>
> > talk about a pain to format.
> >
> > peter
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 15:50:16 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just spent about 30 minutes trying to edit wiki pages and boy it's a
> pain.
No worse than HTML, surely, once you know the syntax?
But there are HTML-aware editors...
> Rather than attempt to update the Jmeter Eclipse howto, I'm
> gonna make a PDF instead.
I'm not saying you should not do this - in fact a PDF would be very
useful - but it does mean that the document cannot then be updated by
just anyone.
Not sure there's an ideal solution here...
> talk about a pain to format.
>
> peter
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com>.
I just spent about 30 minutes trying to edit wiki pages and boy it's a
pain. Rather than attempt to update the Jmeter Eclipse howto, I'm
gonna make a PDF instead.
talk about a pain to format.
peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
+1 to cleaning up the Wiki.
By the way, I discovered from the docs that although previous versions
of pages are saved, this does not apply to attachments - so a copy
needs to be kept of anything that's difficult to recreate. This might
change if the Wiki software was updated.
S.
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 09:04:40 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm ok with that. but I still would like to go through and clean up wiki.
>
> peter
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:05:49 +0000, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Having a PDF version of the documentation is a good idea.
> > If it's not too difficult, we should probably do that anyway.
> >
> > As to having the manual on the Wiki, I think there is a danger that
> > unwanted content could creep in (wiki vandalism etc). Although e-mails
> > are generated when pages are updated, there's no effective control of
> > the contents.
> >
> > So long as the user manual is left on the Wiki, and not distributed
> > with JMeter as an ASF product, that probably does not matter. But it
> > does matter for items that are released by the ASF.
> >
> > Sorry, but I'm -1 on moving the manual to the Wiki.
> >
> > S.
> > On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:07:26 +0100 (CET), replayit@post.cz
> > <re...@post.cz> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > PDF docs will be excelent. Is one file, portable and can be much
> > > easily prited, then HTML.
> > >
> > > Rudolf
> > >
> > > ----- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -----
> > > Od: "sebb" <se...@gmail.com>
> > > Komu: "JMeter Developers List"
> > > <jm...@jakarta.apache.org>,"Peter Lin" <wo...@gmail.com>
> > > Předmět: Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2
> > > Datum: 5.3.2005 - 1:04:07
> > >
> > > > Question is, how will JMeter help then work?
> > > >
> > > > It's very useful to be able to click ^H while on a test
> > > > element and
> > > > have the relevant section displayed. Is there any easy
> > > > way to do this
> > > > with a PDF file? How would the index markers be
> > > > defined?
> > > >
> > > > By the way, the XML processing includes automatic
> > > > indexing and
> > > > cross-referencing. I suspect most of this would have to
> > > > be done
> > > > manually by the Wiki editors.
> > > >
> > > > I think the potential benefits are much less than the
> > > > costs. And I
> > > > wonder if many users would actually take the trouble to
> > > > update the
> > > > manual on the Wiki.
> > > >
> > > > S.
> > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:55:14 -0500, Peter Lin
> > > > <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > well I could always use Acrobat to make a PDF of the
> > > > > wiki site. or
> > > > > does that sound a bit much?
> > > > >
> > > > > peter
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:26:16 -0500, Michael Stover
> > > > > <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > That's a good point. Maybe we could come up with a
> > > > > > documentation
> > > > > > download that does just package up a section of the
> > > > > > wiki.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 21:14 +0000, sebb wrote:
> > > > > > > If the docs are only on the Wiki, then the
> > > > > > > built-in JMeter help will
> > > > > > > stop working, surely?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think we need to provide documentation with the
> > > > > > > JMeter download, so
> > > > > > > JMeter can be used on systems that don't have
> > > > > > > Internet access.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If the Wiki documentation can be easily packaged
> > > > > > > up and included in
> > > > > > > JMeter downloads, then perhaps it would be OK,
> > > > > > > but I'm not sure that
> > > > > > > would be easy. Wiki markup is not HTML...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > S.
> > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:32:01 -0500, Peter Lin
> > > > > > > <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I like the idea of letting the users edit the
> > > > > > > > docs, since often it's
> > > > > > > > too much hassle for users to checkout the docs,
> > > > > > > > make a patch, submit
> > > > > > > > patch and then we commit it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > peter
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:20:34 -0500, Michael
> > > > > > > > Stover <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +0000, sebb
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > OK by me, with one proviso - would it be
> > > > > > > > > > easy to optionally generate
> > > > > > > > > > JMX files in the old format? That should
> > > > > > > > > > make the transition easier
> > > > > > > > > > for some.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yeah, I can do that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release
> > > > > > > > > > soon, as there are quite a
> > > > > > > > > > few useful fixes in 2.0.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > S.
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter
> > > > > > > > > > Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to move the webservice related
> > > > > > > > > > > docs on wiki this weekend
> > > > > > > > > > > also. along with general clean up.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > peter
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike
> > > > > > > > > > > Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I plan on devoting some of my time in
> > > > > > > > > > > > the next 2 weeks to
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation
> > > > > > > > > > > > in the wiki
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web
> > > > > > > > > > > > site to the wiki
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Not sure about this at all - why would that
> > > > > > > > > > help?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Because we have a lot of trouble keeping the
> > > > > > > > > docs up-to-date, and a lot
> > > > > > > > > of useful user information is split between
> > > > > > > > > the user-manual and the wiki
> > > > > > > > > area. If we put it all on the wiki, users
> > > > > > > > > can update the documenation
> > > > > > > > > for us (ie, users often learn things about
> > > > > > > > > the components I don't even
> > > > > > > > > know/realize - no reason they can't put it in
> > > > > > > > > the documentation directly
> > > > > > > > > if it's on the wiki).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Plus, updating the docs becomes easier - just
> > > > > > > > > change the wiki, forget
> > > > > > > > > about writing it in xml then transforming it
> > > > > > > > > to html then uploading to
> > > > > > > > > apache...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Putting finishing touches on the
> > > > > > > > > > > > code in CVS HEAD
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation
> > > > > > > > > > > > for a release.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > What do people think?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Akcni unorova nabidka "3 za cenu 1"! Ziskejte
> > > VOLNY ADSL 512/128 3GB za cenu 1GB!
> > > http://adsl.volny.cz
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com>.
I'm ok with that. but I still would like to go through and clean up wiki.
peter
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:05:49 +0000, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having a PDF version of the documentation is a good idea.
> If it's not too difficult, we should probably do that anyway.
>
> As to having the manual on the Wiki, I think there is a danger that
> unwanted content could creep in (wiki vandalism etc). Although e-mails
> are generated when pages are updated, there's no effective control of
> the contents.
>
> So long as the user manual is left on the Wiki, and not distributed
> with JMeter as an ASF product, that probably does not matter. But it
> does matter for items that are released by the ASF.
>
> Sorry, but I'm -1 on moving the manual to the Wiki.
>
> S.
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:07:26 +0100 (CET), replayit@post.cz
> <re...@post.cz> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > PDF docs will be excelent. Is one file, portable and can be much
> > easily prited, then HTML.
> >
> > Rudolf
> >
> > ----- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -----
> > Od: "sebb" <se...@gmail.com>
> > Komu: "JMeter Developers List"
> > <jm...@jakarta.apache.org>,"Peter Lin" <wo...@gmail.com>
> > Předmět: Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2
> > Datum: 5.3.2005 - 1:04:07
> >
> > > Question is, how will JMeter help then work?
> > >
> > > It's very useful to be able to click ^H while on a test
> > > element and
> > > have the relevant section displayed. Is there any easy
> > > way to do this
> > > with a PDF file? How would the index markers be
> > > defined?
> > >
> > > By the way, the XML processing includes automatic
> > > indexing and
> > > cross-referencing. I suspect most of this would have to
> > > be done
> > > manually by the Wiki editors.
> > >
> > > I think the potential benefits are much less than the
> > > costs. And I
> > > wonder if many users would actually take the trouble to
> > > update the
> > > manual on the Wiki.
> > >
> > > S.
> > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:55:14 -0500, Peter Lin
> > > <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > well I could always use Acrobat to make a PDF of the
> > > > wiki site. or
> > > > does that sound a bit much?
> > > >
> > > > peter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:26:16 -0500, Michael Stover
> > > > <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > That's a good point. Maybe we could come up with a
> > > > > documentation
> > > > > download that does just package up a section of the
> > > > > wiki.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 21:14 +0000, sebb wrote:
> > > > > > If the docs are only on the Wiki, then the
> > > > > > built-in JMeter help will
> > > > > > stop working, surely?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think we need to provide documentation with the
> > > > > > JMeter download, so
> > > > > > JMeter can be used on systems that don't have
> > > > > > Internet access.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If the Wiki documentation can be easily packaged
> > > > > > up and included in
> > > > > > JMeter downloads, then perhaps it would be OK,
> > > > > > but I'm not sure that
> > > > > > would be easy. Wiki markup is not HTML...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > S.
> > > > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:32:01 -0500, Peter Lin
> > > > > > <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I like the idea of letting the users edit the
> > > > > > > docs, since often it's
> > > > > > > too much hassle for users to checkout the docs,
> > > > > > > make a patch, submit
> > > > > > > patch and then we commit it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > peter
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:20:34 -0500, Michael
> > > > > > > Stover <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +0000, sebb
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > OK by me, with one proviso - would it be
> > > > > > > > > easy to optionally generate
> > > > > > > > > JMX files in the old format? That should
> > > > > > > > > make the transition easier
> > > > > > > > > for some.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yeah, I can do that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release
> > > > > > > > > soon, as there are quite a
> > > > > > > > > few useful fixes in 2.0.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > S.
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter
> > > > > > > > > Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I'll try to move the webservice related
> > > > > > > > > > docs on wiki this weekend
> > > > > > > > > > also. along with general clean up.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > peter
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike
> > > > > > > > > > Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > I plan on devoting some of my time in
> > > > > > > > > > > the next 2 weeks to
> > > > > > > > > > > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation
> > > > > > > > > > > in the wiki
> > > > > > > > > > > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web
> > > > > > > > > > > site to the wiki
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Not sure about this at all - why would that
> > > > > > > > > help?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Because we have a lot of trouble keeping the
> > > > > > > > docs up-to-date, and a lot
> > > > > > > > of useful user information is split between
> > > > > > > > the user-manual and the wiki
> > > > > > > > area. If we put it all on the wiki, users
> > > > > > > > can update the documenation
> > > > > > > > for us (ie, users often learn things about
> > > > > > > > the components I don't even
> > > > > > > > know/realize - no reason they can't put it in
> > > > > > > > the documentation directly
> > > > > > > > if it's on the wiki).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Plus, updating the docs becomes easier - just
> > > > > > > > change the wiki, forget
> > > > > > > > about writing it in xml then transforming it
> > > > > > > > to html then uploading to
> > > > > > > > apache...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 3. Putting finishing touches on the
> > > > > > > > > > > code in CVS HEAD
> > > > > > > > > > > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation
> > > > > > > > > > > for a release.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > What do people think?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Akcni unorova nabidka "3 za cenu 1"! Ziskejte
> > VOLNY ADSL 512/128 3GB za cenu 1GB!
> > http://adsl.volny.cz
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Having a PDF version of the documentation is a good idea.
If it's not too difficult, we should probably do that anyway.
As to having the manual on the Wiki, I think there is a danger that
unwanted content could creep in (wiki vandalism etc). Although e-mails
are generated when pages are updated, there's no effective control of
the contents.
So long as the user manual is left on the Wiki, and not distributed
with JMeter as an ASF product, that probably does not matter. But it
does matter for items that are released by the ASF.
Sorry, but I'm -1 on moving the manual to the Wiki.
S.
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:07:26 +0100 (CET), replayit@post.cz
<re...@post.cz> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> PDF docs will be excelent. Is one file, portable and can be much
> easily prited, then HTML.
>
> Rudolf
>
> ----- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -----
> Od: "sebb" <se...@gmail.com>
> Komu: "JMeter Developers List"
> <jm...@jakarta.apache.org>,"Peter Lin" <wo...@gmail.com>
> Předmět: Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2
> Datum: 5.3.2005 - 1:04:07
>
> > Question is, how will JMeter help then work?
> >
> > It's very useful to be able to click ^H while on a test
> > element and
> > have the relevant section displayed. Is there any easy
> > way to do this
> > with a PDF file? How would the index markers be
> > defined?
> >
> > By the way, the XML processing includes automatic
> > indexing and
> > cross-referencing. I suspect most of this would have to
> > be done
> > manually by the Wiki editors.
> >
> > I think the potential benefits are much less than the
> > costs. And I
> > wonder if many users would actually take the trouble to
> > update the
> > manual on the Wiki.
> >
> > S.
> > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:55:14 -0500, Peter Lin
> > <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > well I could always use Acrobat to make a PDF of the
> > > wiki site. or
> > > does that sound a bit much?
> > >
> > > peter
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:26:16 -0500, Michael Stover
> > > <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > That's a good point. Maybe we could come up with a
> > > > documentation
> > > > download that does just package up a section of the
> > > > wiki.
> > > >
> > > > -Mike
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 21:14 +0000, sebb wrote:
> > > > > If the docs are only on the Wiki, then the
> > > > > built-in JMeter help will
> > > > > stop working, surely?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we need to provide documentation with the
> > > > > JMeter download, so
> > > > > JMeter can be used on systems that don't have
> > > > > Internet access.
> > > > >
> > > > > If the Wiki documentation can be easily packaged
> > > > > up and included in
> > > > > JMeter downloads, then perhaps it would be OK,
> > > > > but I'm not sure that
> > > > > would be easy. Wiki markup is not HTML...
> > > > >
> > > > > S.
> > > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:32:01 -0500, Peter Lin
> > > > > <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I like the idea of letting the users edit the
> > > > > > docs, since often it's
> > > > > > too much hassle for users to checkout the docs,
> > > > > > make a patch, submit
> > > > > > patch and then we commit it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > peter
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:20:34 -0500, Michael
> > > > > > Stover <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +0000, sebb
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > OK by me, with one proviso - would it be
> > > > > > > > easy to optionally generate
> > > > > > > > JMX files in the old format? That should
> > > > > > > > make the transition easier
> > > > > > > > for some.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yeah, I can do that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release
> > > > > > > > soon, as there are quite a
> > > > > > > > few useful fixes in 2.0.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > S.
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter
> > > > > > > > Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I'll try to move the webservice related
> > > > > > > > > docs on wiki this weekend
> > > > > > > > > also. along with general clean up.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > peter
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike
> > > > > > > > > Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I plan on devoting some of my time in
> > > > > > > > > > the next 2 weeks to
> > > > > > > > > > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation
> > > > > > > > > > in the wiki
> > > > > > > > > > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web
> > > > > > > > > > site to the wiki
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Not sure about this at all - why would that
> > > > > > > > help?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Because we have a lot of trouble keeping the
> > > > > > > docs up-to-date, and a lot
> > > > > > > of useful user information is split between
> > > > > > > the user-manual and the wiki
> > > > > > > area. If we put it all on the wiki, users
> > > > > > > can update the documenation
> > > > > > > for us (ie, users often learn things about
> > > > > > > the components I don't even
> > > > > > > know/realize - no reason they can't put it in
> > > > > > > the documentation directly
> > > > > > > if it's on the wiki).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Plus, updating the docs becomes easier - just
> > > > > > > change the wiki, forget
> > > > > > > about writing it in xml then transforming it
> > > > > > > to html then uploading to
> > > > > > > apache...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 3. Putting finishing touches on the
> > > > > > > > > > code in CVS HEAD
> > > > > > > > > > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation
> > > > > > > > > > for a release.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What do people think?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> Akcni unorova nabidka "3 za cenu 1"! Ziskejte
> VOLNY ADSL 512/128 3GB za cenu 1GB!
> http://adsl.volny.cz
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by re...@post.cz.
Hello,
PDF docs will be excelent. Is one file, portable and can be much
easily prited, then HTML.
Rudolf
----- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -----
Od: "sebb" <se...@gmail.com>
Komu: "JMeter Developers List"
<jm...@jakarta.apache.org>,"Peter Lin" <wo...@gmail.com>
Předmět: Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2
Datum: 5.3.2005 - 1:04:07
> Question is, how will JMeter help then work?
>
> It's very useful to be able to click ^H while on a test
> element and
> have the relevant section displayed. Is there any easy
> way to do this
> with a PDF file? How would the index markers be
> defined?
>
> By the way, the XML processing includes automatic
> indexing and
> cross-referencing. I suspect most of this would have to
> be done
> manually by the Wiki editors.
>
> I think the potential benefits are much less than the
> costs. And I
> wonder if many users would actually take the trouble to
> update the
> manual on the Wiki.
>
> S.
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:55:14 -0500, Peter Lin
> <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > well I could always use Acrobat to make a PDF of the
> > wiki site. or
> > does that sound a bit much?
> >
> > peter
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:26:16 -0500, Michael Stover
> > <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > That's a good point. Maybe we could come up with a
> > > documentation
> > > download that does just package up a section of the
> > > wiki.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 21:14 +0000, sebb wrote:
> > > > If the docs are only on the Wiki, then the
> > > > built-in JMeter help will
> > > > stop working, surely?
> > > >
> > > > I think we need to provide documentation with the
> > > > JMeter download, so
> > > > JMeter can be used on systems that don't have
> > > > Internet access.
> > > >
> > > > If the Wiki documentation can be easily packaged
> > > > up and included in
> > > > JMeter downloads, then perhaps it would be OK,
> > > > but I'm not sure that
> > > > would be easy. Wiki markup is not HTML...
> > > >
> > > > S.
> > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:32:01 -0500, Peter Lin
> > > > <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I like the idea of letting the users edit the
> > > > > docs, since often it's
> > > > > too much hassle for users to checkout the docs,
> > > > > make a patch, submit
> > > > > patch and then we commit it.
> > > > >
> > > > > peter
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:20:34 -0500, Michael
> > > > > Stover <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +0000, sebb
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > OK by me, with one proviso - would it be
> > > > > > > easy to optionally generate
> > > > > > > JMX files in the old format? That should
> > > > > > > make the transition easier
> > > > > > > for some.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah, I can do that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release
> > > > > > > soon, as there are quite a
> > > > > > > few useful fixes in 2.0.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > S.
> > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter
> > > > > > > Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I'll try to move the webservice related
> > > > > > > > docs on wiki this weekend
> > > > > > > > also. along with general clean up.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > peter
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike
> > > > > > > > Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I plan on devoting some of my time in
> > > > > > > > > the next 2 weeks to
> > > > > > > > > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation
> > > > > > > > > in the wiki
> > > > > > > > > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web
> > > > > > > > > site to the wiki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not sure about this at all - why would that
> > > > > > > help?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Because we have a lot of trouble keeping the
> > > > > > docs up-to-date, and a lot
> > > > > > of useful user information is split between
> > > > > > the user-manual and the wiki
> > > > > > area. If we put it all on the wiki, users
> > > > > > can update the documenation
> > > > > > for us (ie, users often learn things about
> > > > > > the components I don't even
> > > > > > know/realize - no reason they can't put it in
> > > > > > the documentation directly
> > > > > > if it's on the wiki).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Plus, updating the docs becomes easier - just
> > > > > > change the wiki, forget
> > > > > > about writing it in xml then transforming it
> > > > > > to html then uploading to
> > > > > > apache...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 3. Putting finishing touches on the
> > > > > > > > > code in CVS HEAD
> > > > > > > > > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation
> > > > > > > > > for a release.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What do people think?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
Akcni unorova nabidka "3 za cenu 1"! Ziskejte
VOLNY ADSL 512/128 3GB za cenu 1GB!
http://adsl.volny.cz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Question is, how will JMeter help then work?
It's very useful to be able to click ^H while on a test element and
have the relevant section displayed. Is there any easy way to do this
with a PDF file? How would the index markers be defined?
By the way, the XML processing includes automatic indexing and
cross-referencing. I suspect most of this would have to be done
manually by the Wiki editors.
I think the potential benefits are much less than the costs. And I
wonder if many users would actually take the trouble to update the
manual on the Wiki.
S.
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:55:14 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> well I could always use Acrobat to make a PDF of the wiki site. or
> does that sound a bit much?
>
> peter
>
>
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:26:16 -0500, Michael Stover <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > That's a good point. Maybe we could come up with a documentation
> > download that does just package up a section of the wiki.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 21:14 +0000, sebb wrote:
> > > If the docs are only on the Wiki, then the built-in JMeter help will
> > > stop working, surely?
> > >
> > > I think we need to provide documentation with the JMeter download, so
> > > JMeter can be used on systems that don't have Internet access.
> > >
> > > If the Wiki documentation can be easily packaged up and included in
> > > JMeter downloads, then perhaps it would be OK, but I'm not sure that
> > > would be easy. Wiki markup is not HTML...
> > >
> > > S.
> > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:32:01 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I like the idea of letting the users edit the docs, since often it's
> > > > too much hassle for users to checkout the docs, make a patch, submit
> > > > patch and then we commit it.
> > > >
> > > > peter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:20:34 -0500, Michael Stover <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +0000, sebb wrote:
> > > > > > OK by me, with one proviso - would it be easy to optionally generate
> > > > > > JMX files in the old format? That should make the transition easier
> > > > > > for some.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, I can do that.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release soon, as there are quite a
> > > > > > few useful fixes in 2.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > S.
> > > > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I'll try to move the webservice related docs on wiki this weekend
> > > > > > > also. along with general clean up.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > peter
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I plan on devoting some of my time in the next 2 weeks to
> > > > > > > > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation in the wiki
> > > > > > > > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web site to the wiki
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not sure about this at all - why would that help?
> > > > >
> > > > > Because we have a lot of trouble keeping the docs up-to-date, and a lot
> > > > > of useful user information is split between the user-manual and the wiki
> > > > > area. If we put it all on the wiki, users can update the documenation
> > > > > for us (ie, users often learn things about the components I don't even
> > > > > know/realize - no reason they can't put it in the documentation directly
> > > > > if it's on the wiki).
> > > > >
> > > > > Plus, updating the docs becomes easier - just change the wiki, forget
> > > > > about writing it in xml then transforming it to html then uploading to
> > > > > apache...
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 3. Putting finishing touches on the code in CVS HEAD
> > > > > > > > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation for a release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What do people think?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com>.
well I could always use Acrobat to make a PDF of the wiki site. or
does that sound a bit much?
peter
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:26:16 -0500, Michael Stover <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> That's a good point. Maybe we could come up with a documentation
> download that does just package up a section of the wiki.
>
> -Mike
>
> On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 21:14 +0000, sebb wrote:
> > If the docs are only on the Wiki, then the built-in JMeter help will
> > stop working, surely?
> >
> > I think we need to provide documentation with the JMeter download, so
> > JMeter can be used on systems that don't have Internet access.
> >
> > If the Wiki documentation can be easily packaged up and included in
> > JMeter downloads, then perhaps it would be OK, but I'm not sure that
> > would be easy. Wiki markup is not HTML...
> >
> > S.
> > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:32:01 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I like the idea of letting the users edit the docs, since often it's
> > > too much hassle for users to checkout the docs, make a patch, submit
> > > patch and then we commit it.
> > >
> > > peter
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:20:34 -0500, Michael Stover <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +0000, sebb wrote:
> > > > > OK by me, with one proviso - would it be easy to optionally generate
> > > > > JMX files in the old format? That should make the transition easier
> > > > > for some.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, I can do that.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release soon, as there are quite a
> > > > > few useful fixes in 2.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > S.
> > > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I'll try to move the webservice related docs on wiki this weekend
> > > > > > also. along with general clean up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > peter
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > I plan on devoting some of my time in the next 2 weeks to
> > > > > > > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation in the wiki
> > > > > > > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web site to the wiki
> > > > >
> > > > > Not sure about this at all - why would that help?
> > > >
> > > > Because we have a lot of trouble keeping the docs up-to-date, and a lot
> > > > of useful user information is split between the user-manual and the wiki
> > > > area. If we put it all on the wiki, users can update the documenation
> > > > for us (ie, users often learn things about the components I don't even
> > > > know/realize - no reason they can't put it in the documentation directly
> > > > if it's on the wiki).
> > > >
> > > > Plus, updating the docs becomes easier - just change the wiki, forget
> > > > about writing it in xml then transforming it to html then uploading to
> > > > apache...
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. Putting finishing touches on the code in CVS HEAD
> > > > > > > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation for a release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What do people think?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by Michael Stover <ms...@apache.org>.
That's a good point. Maybe we could come up with a documentation
download that does just package up a section of the wiki.
-Mike
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 21:14 +0000, sebb wrote:
> If the docs are only on the Wiki, then the built-in JMeter help will
> stop working, surely?
>
> I think we need to provide documentation with the JMeter download, so
> JMeter can be used on systems that don't have Internet access.
>
> If the Wiki documentation can be easily packaged up and included in
> JMeter downloads, then perhaps it would be OK, but I'm not sure that
> would be easy. Wiki markup is not HTML...
>
> S.
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:32:01 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I like the idea of letting the users edit the docs, since often it's
> > too much hassle for users to checkout the docs, make a patch, submit
> > patch and then we commit it.
> >
> > peter
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:20:34 -0500, Michael Stover <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +0000, sebb wrote:
> > > > OK by me, with one proviso - would it be easy to optionally generate
> > > > JMX files in the old format? That should make the transition easier
> > > > for some.
> > >
> > > Yeah, I can do that.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release soon, as there are quite a
> > > > few useful fixes in 2.0.
> > > >
> > > > S.
> > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I'll try to move the webservice related docs on wiki this weekend
> > > > > also. along with general clean up.
> > > > >
> > > > > peter
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> > > > > > I plan on devoting some of my time in the next 2 weeks to
> > > > > > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation in the wiki
> > > > > > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web site to the wiki
> > > >
> > > > Not sure about this at all - why would that help?
> > >
> > > Because we have a lot of trouble keeping the docs up-to-date, and a lot
> > > of useful user information is split between the user-manual and the wiki
> > > area. If we put it all on the wiki, users can update the documenation
> > > for us (ie, users often learn things about the components I don't even
> > > know/realize - no reason they can't put it in the documentation directly
> > > if it's on the wiki).
> > >
> > > Plus, updating the docs becomes easier - just change the wiki, forget
> > > about writing it in xml then transforming it to html then uploading to
> > > apache...
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > 3. Putting finishing touches on the code in CVS HEAD
> > > > > > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation for a release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do people think?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
If the docs are only on the Wiki, then the built-in JMeter help will
stop working, surely?
I think we need to provide documentation with the JMeter download, so
JMeter can be used on systems that don't have Internet access.
If the Wiki documentation can be easily packaged up and included in
JMeter downloads, then perhaps it would be OK, but I'm not sure that
would be easy. Wiki markup is not HTML...
S.
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:32:01 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like the idea of letting the users edit the docs, since often it's
> too much hassle for users to checkout the docs, make a patch, submit
> patch and then we commit it.
>
> peter
>
>
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:20:34 -0500, Michael Stover <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +0000, sebb wrote:
> > > OK by me, with one proviso - would it be easy to optionally generate
> > > JMX files in the old format? That should make the transition easier
> > > for some.
> >
> > Yeah, I can do that.
> >
> > >
> > > I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release soon, as there are quite a
> > > few useful fixes in 2.0.
> > >
> > > S.
> > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I'll try to move the webservice related docs on wiki this weekend
> > > > also. along with general clean up.
> > > >
> > > > peter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> > > > > I plan on devoting some of my time in the next 2 weeks to
> > > > > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation in the wiki
> > > > > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web site to the wiki
> > >
> > > Not sure about this at all - why would that help?
> >
> > Because we have a lot of trouble keeping the docs up-to-date, and a lot
> > of useful user information is split between the user-manual and the wiki
> > area. If we put it all on the wiki, users can update the documenation
> > for us (ie, users often learn things about the components I don't even
> > know/realize - no reason they can't put it in the documentation directly
> > if it's on the wiki).
> >
> > Plus, updating the docs becomes easier - just change the wiki, forget
> > about writing it in xml then transforming it to html then uploading to
> > apache...
> >
> > >
> > > > > 3. Putting finishing touches on the code in CVS HEAD
> > > > > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation for a release.
> > > > >
> > > > > What do people think?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mike
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com>.
I like the idea of letting the users edit the docs, since often it's
too much hassle for users to checkout the docs, make a patch, submit
patch and then we commit it.
peter
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:20:34 -0500, Michael Stover <ms...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +0000, sebb wrote:
> > OK by me, with one proviso - would it be easy to optionally generate
> > JMX files in the old format? That should make the transition easier
> > for some.
>
> Yeah, I can do that.
>
> >
> > I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release soon, as there are quite a
> > few useful fixes in 2.0.
> >
> > S.
> > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'll try to move the webservice related docs on wiki this weekend
> > > also. along with general clean up.
> > >
> > > peter
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> > > > I plan on devoting some of my time in the next 2 weeks to
> > > > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation in the wiki
> > > > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web site to the wiki
> >
> > Not sure about this at all - why would that help?
>
> Because we have a lot of trouble keeping the docs up-to-date, and a lot
> of useful user information is split between the user-manual and the wiki
> area. If we put it all on the wiki, users can update the documenation
> for us (ie, users often learn things about the components I don't even
> know/realize - no reason they can't put it in the documentation directly
> if it's on the wiki).
>
> Plus, updating the docs becomes easier - just change the wiki, forget
> about writing it in xml then transforming it to html then uploading to
> apache...
>
> >
> > > > 3. Putting finishing touches on the code in CVS HEAD
> > > > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation for a release.
> > > >
> > > > What do people think?
> > > >
> > > > -Mike
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by Michael Stover <ms...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +0000, sebb wrote:
> OK by me, with one proviso - would it be easy to optionally generate
> JMX files in the old format? That should make the transition easier
> for some.
Yeah, I can do that.
>
> I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release soon, as there are quite a
> few useful fixes in 2.0.
>
> S.
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'll try to move the webservice related docs on wiki this weekend
> > also. along with general clean up.
> >
> > peter
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> > > I plan on devoting some of my time in the next 2 weeks to
> > > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation in the wiki
> > > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web site to the wiki
>
> Not sure about this at all - why would that help?
Because we have a lot of trouble keeping the docs up-to-date, and a lot
of useful user information is split between the user-manual and the wiki
area. If we put it all on the wiki, users can update the documenation
for us (ie, users often learn things about the components I don't even
know/realize - no reason they can't put it in the documentation directly
if it's on the wiki).
Plus, updating the docs becomes easier - just change the wiki, forget
about writing it in xml then transforming it to html then uploading to
apache...
>
> > > 3. Putting finishing touches on the code in CVS HEAD
> > > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation for a release.
> > >
> > > What do people think?
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
OK by me, with one proviso - would it be easy to optionally generate
JMX files in the old format? That should make the transition easier
for some.
I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release soon, as there are quite a
few useful fixes in 2.0.
S.
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll try to move the webservice related docs on wiki this weekend
> also. along with general clean up.
>
> peter
>
>
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> > I plan on devoting some of my time in the next 2 weeks to
> > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation in the wiki
> > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web site to the wiki
Not sure about this at all - why would that help?
> > 3. Putting finishing touches on the code in CVS HEAD
> > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation for a release.
> >
> > What do people think?
> >
> > -Mike
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com>.
I'll try to move the webservice related docs on wiki this weekend
also. along with general clean up.
peter
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike Stover <ms...@gblx.net> wrote:
> I plan on devoting some of my time in the next 2 weeks to
> 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation in the wiki
> 2. Moving the User Manual from the web site to the wiki
> 3. Putting finishing touches on the code in CVS HEAD
> 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation for a release.
>
> What do people think?
>
> -Mike
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by Mike Stover <ms...@gblx.net>.
I plan on devoting some of my time in the next 2 weeks to
1. cleaning out obsolete documentation in the wiki
2. Moving the User Manual from the web site to the wiki
3. Putting finishing touches on the code in CVS HEAD
4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation for a release.
What do people think?
-Mike
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 16:57 +0100, replayit@post.cz wrote:
> OK I will check them after.
> Rudolf
>
> ----- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -----
> Od: "Peter Lin" <wo...@gmail.com>
> Komu: "jmeter-dev" <jm...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Předmět: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
> Datum: 4.3.2005 - 16:41:59
>
> > i was chatting with Mike and thought maybe we should
> > try to shoot for
> > a new release in 2 weeks?
> >
> >
> > this weekend I plan to go over the docs and wiki.
> >
> > peter
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
--
Michael Stover
mstover@gblx.net
AIM: mstover777
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Posted by re...@post.cz.
OK I will check them after.
Rudolf
----- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -----
Od: "Peter Lin" <wo...@gmail.com>
Komu: "jmeter-dev" <jm...@jakarta.apache.org>
Předmět: [Proposal] - shoot for a new release in 2 weeks
Datum: 4.3.2005 - 16:41:59
> i was chatting with Mike and thought maybe we should
> try to shoot for
> a new release in 2 weeks?
>
>
> this weekend I plan to go over the docs and wiki.
>
> peter
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
Levnější internet v pracovní dny již od 18:00 hod.
Surfujte s VOLNÝ!
http://mimospicku.volny.cz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org