You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Martin Nicolay <ma...@osm-gmbh.de> on 2003/07/02 14:07:28 UTC

svn ln planned?

Hi!

I'm new to svn, so I may have missed the answer.

I've read a few posts (last of 2002-10-17) about a linking command 'svn ln'.
Is this really planned?  The posts deal with comparision of snv ln and
unix symlinks.

In older posts I found:

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 06:55:24PM +0100, Branko Èibej wrote:
> The design for "svn ln" is far from complete. It hasn't even been
> started yet, AFAIK.

thanks,
	martin

-- 
Martin Nicolay (mn@osm-gmbh.de)

	The box said it requires Windows 95 or better so I installed Linux

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn ln planned?

Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>.
From: Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>
Date: 02 Jul 2003 09:24:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pi...@wsmn.osm-gmbh.de>
Message-ID: <m3...@kepler.ch.collab.net>
Lines: 8
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Martin Nicolay <ma...@osm-gmbh.de> writes:

> I've read a few posts (last of 2002-10-17) about a linking command 'svn ln'.
> Is this really planned?  The posts deal with comparision of snv ln and
> unix symlinks.

It's been discussed as a possible post-1.0 feature, and filed as issue
677.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org