You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> on 2016/02/01 20:07:21 UTC
[DISCUSS] Release 0.10.2
Hey all,
Our release-0.10 branch contains some important fixes (for example a
critical fix in the network stack). I would like to hear your opinions
about doing a 0.10.2 bug fix release.
I think it's a good idea to go for it now. Even though we have the 1.0.0
release coming up, it's not clear when exactly it will be ready to be voted
on. Furthermore, I don't expect that everyone will immediately upgrade.
Testing a bug fix release is relatively low overhead compared to doing a
major release. It should be doable within the week.
What's your opinion?
If there is a consensus to do it, I would volunteer to be release manager.
– Ufuk
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.10.2
Posted by Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>.
I've created the release candidate and started the vote thread.
This is the document to coordinate testing:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oCOHwHwZNjHb7MX-qLvA61akEBOAxSIYo53MoygUqxQ/
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On 02 Feb 2016, at 17:30, Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for taking care of this. +1
> >
> > I'd like to include this in to the 0.10.2 release:
> > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1576
>
> OK (merged to master and release-10)
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.10.2
Posted by Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>.
> On 02 Feb 2016, at 17:30, Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thank you for taking care of this. +1
>
> I'd like to include this in to the 0.10.2 release:
> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1576
OK (merged to master and release-10)
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.10.2
Posted by Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>.
Thank you for taking care of this. +1
I'd like to include this in to the 0.10.2 release:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1576
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On 02 Feb 2016, at 11:43, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > @Ufuk: Would you be the release manager for that one?
>
> Yes.
>
> Thanks for the responses so far. I will go ahead and prepare a release
> candidate soon.
>
> If you have any minor fixes, which you would like to have in the release,
> please report here.
>
> – Ufuk
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.10.2
Posted by Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>.
> On 02 Feb 2016, at 11:43, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> @Ufuk: Would you be the release manager for that one?
Yes.
Thanks for the responses so far. I will go ahead and prepare a release candidate soon.
If you have any minor fixes, which you would like to have in the release, please report here.
– Ufuk
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.10.2
Posted by Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>.
+1
@Ufuk: Would you be the release manager for that one?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1, since user were asking for it.
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > 2016-02-02 10:44 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi Ufuk,
> > >
> > > +1 If the fixes are straightforward such that we don't need to test
> > > extensively, I'm all for it! Releasing doesn't take much time then.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > +1 for a 0.10.2 maintenance release.
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, February 1, 2016, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hey all,
> > > >>
> > > >> Our release-0.10 branch contains some important fixes (for example a
> > > >> critical fix in the network stack). I would like to hear your
> opinions
> > > >> about doing a 0.10.2 bug fix release.
> > > >>
> > > >> I think it's a good idea to go for it now. Even though we have the
> > 1.0.0
> > > >> release coming up, it's not clear when exactly it will be ready to
> be
> > > voted
> > > >> on. Furthermore, I don't expect that everyone will immediately
> > upgrade.
> > > >> Testing a bug fix release is relatively low overhead compared to
> > doing a
> > > >> major release. It should be doable within the week.
> > > >>
> > > >> What's your opinion?
> > > >>
> > > >> If there is a consensus to do it, I would volunteer to be release
> > > manager.
> > > >>
> > > >> – Ufuk
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.10.2
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
+1, since user were asking for it.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> 2016-02-02 10:44 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Ufuk,
> >
> > +1 If the fixes are straightforward such that we don't need to test
> > extensively, I'm all for it! Releasing doesn't take much time then.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1 for a 0.10.2 maintenance release.
> > >
> > > On Monday, February 1, 2016, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey all,
> > >>
> > >> Our release-0.10 branch contains some important fixes (for example a
> > >> critical fix in the network stack). I would like to hear your opinions
> > >> about doing a 0.10.2 bug fix release.
> > >>
> > >> I think it's a good idea to go for it now. Even though we have the
> 1.0.0
> > >> release coming up, it's not clear when exactly it will be ready to be
> > voted
> > >> on. Furthermore, I don't expect that everyone will immediately
> upgrade.
> > >> Testing a bug fix release is relatively low overhead compared to
> doing a
> > >> major release. It should be doable within the week.
> > >>
> > >> What's your opinion?
> > >>
> > >> If there is a consensus to do it, I would volunteer to be release
> > manager.
> > >>
> > >> – Ufuk
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.10.2
Posted by Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com>.
+1
2016-02-02 10:44 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>:
> Hi Ufuk,
>
> +1 If the fixes are straightforward such that we don't need to test
> extensively, I'm all for it! Releasing doesn't take much time then.
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 for a 0.10.2 maintenance release.
> >
> > On Monday, February 1, 2016, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> Our release-0.10 branch contains some important fixes (for example a
> >> critical fix in the network stack). I would like to hear your opinions
> >> about doing a 0.10.2 bug fix release.
> >>
> >> I think it's a good idea to go for it now. Even though we have the 1.0.0
> >> release coming up, it's not clear when exactly it will be ready to be
> voted
> >> on. Furthermore, I don't expect that everyone will immediately upgrade.
> >> Testing a bug fix release is relatively low overhead compared to doing a
> >> major release. It should be doable within the week.
> >>
> >> What's your opinion?
> >>
> >> If there is a consensus to do it, I would volunteer to be release
> manager.
> >>
> >> – Ufuk
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.10.2
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
Hi Ufuk,
+1 If the fixes are straightforward such that we don't need to test
extensively, I'm all for it! Releasing doesn't take much time then.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for a 0.10.2 maintenance release.
>
> On Monday, February 1, 2016, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Our release-0.10 branch contains some important fixes (for example a
>> critical fix in the network stack). I would like to hear your opinions
>> about doing a 0.10.2 bug fix release.
>>
>> I think it's a good idea to go for it now. Even though we have the 1.0.0
>> release coming up, it's not clear when exactly it will be ready to be voted
>> on. Furthermore, I don't expect that everyone will immediately upgrade.
>> Testing a bug fix release is relatively low overhead compared to doing a
>> major release. It should be doable within the week.
>>
>> What's your opinion?
>>
>> If there is a consensus to do it, I would volunteer to be release manager.
>>
>> – Ufuk
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.10.2
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>.
+1 for a 0.10.2 maintenance release.
On Monday, February 1, 2016, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Our release-0.10 branch contains some important fixes (for example a
> critical fix in the network stack). I would like to hear your opinions
> about doing a 0.10.2 bug fix release.
>
> I think it's a good idea to go for it now. Even though we have the 1.0.0
> release coming up, it's not clear when exactly it will be ready to be voted
> on. Furthermore, I don't expect that everyone will immediately upgrade.
> Testing a bug fix release is relatively low overhead compared to doing a
> major release. It should be doable within the week.
>
> What's your opinion?
>
> If there is a consensus to do it, I would volunteer to be release manager.
>
> – Ufuk
>