Re: svn commit: rev 4532 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_wc libsvn_ra_local libsvn_client mod_dav_svn libsvn_ra_svn libsvn_repos libsvn_ra_dav svnserve

[Kevin Pilch-Bisson ke...@pilch-bisson.net]

On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 01:00:56PM -0600, jerenkrantz@tigris.org wrote:
 Author: jerenkrantz
 Date: 2003-01-23 13:00:42 -0600 (Thu, 23 Jan 2003)
 New Revision: 4532
 
 Modified:
    trunk/subversion/include/svn_ra.h
    trunk/subversion/include/svn_repos.h
    trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/diff.c
    trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/fetch.c
    trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_local/ra_plugin.c
    trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_svn/client.c
    trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/reporter.c
    trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_crawler.c
    trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/update.c
    trunk/subversion/svnserve/serve.c
 Log:
 Add pool parameter to the svn_repos_*_path functions.  This eliminates
 memory problems on update operations with a large number of files in a
 directory.  (Also fixes a similar problem with svn ls -R - see below.)
 
Are you telling me that this was the cause of issue 773? Or does that still
exist as a separate issue?

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Pilch-Bisson                    http://www.pilch-bisson.net
     Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
     has never precluded their reinvention. - Larry Wall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Re: svn commit: rev 4532 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_wc libsvn_ra_local libsvn_client mod_dav_svn libsvn_ra_svn libsvn_repos libsvn_ra_dav svnserve

[Justin Erenkrantz je...@apache.org]

--On Thursday, January 23, 2003 4:24 AM -0800 Kevin Pilch-Bisson 
kevin@pilch-bisson.net wrote:

 Are you telling me that this was the cause of issue 773? Or does
 that still exist as a separate issue?

It's still a separate issue.  These problems are related in lots of 
ways, but the PROPFIND code path is infinitely messier because of the 
interactions between httpd, mod_dav, mod_dav_svn, and libsvn_fs.

I wanted to get this one off of my plate before thinking about #773 
again.

I was able to run 'make check' against my earlier patch for #773 that 
decreases the PROPFIND case (down to about ~13MB from ~110MB for 400 
files), but it didn't pass.  So, I probably need to back out some of 
those changes - finding out which ones is insanely tedious.  -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org