You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@geode.apache.org by "Darrel Schneider (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/12/05 23:05:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-6151) The jdbc-mapping commands should use consistent terminology when referring to a jdbc mapping

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Darrel Schneider updated GEODE-6151:
------------------------------------
    Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

> The jdbc-mapping commands should use consistent terminology when referring to a jdbc mapping
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-6151
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6151
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: extensions
>            Reporter: Darrel Schneider
>            Assignee: Darrel Schneider
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Multiple gfsh jdbc-mapping commands exist. They currently use the following terms to refer to a jdbc-mapping: "mapping", "region mapping", and "JDBC mapping". They should consistently use the term "JDBC mapping".



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)