Handling blocked ham

[Robert Fitzpatrick <li...@webtent.net>]

I just got a report of ham blocked with the following rules. This is a
repeated ham report for TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1 and thinking of setting its
score to zero. Is there any recommendations on how to handle any of
these rules?

X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.692 tag=-999 tag2=5 kill=5
        tests=[DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE=1.677,
        HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.836, HTML_MESSAGE=0.4, MY_CID_AND_STYLE=1.2,
        PART_CID_STOCK=1, PART_CID_STOCK_LESS=1, TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1=2.1]

-- 
Robert

Re: Handling blocked ham

[Richard Frovarp <Ri...@sendit.nodak.edu>]

Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I just got a report of ham blocked with the following rules. This is a
> repeated ham report for TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1 and thinking of setting its
> score to zero. Is there any recommendations on how to handle any of
> these rules?
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.692 tag=-999 tag2=5 kill=5
>         tests=[DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE=1.677,
>         HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.836, HTML_MESSAGE=0.4, MY_CID_AND_STYLE=1.2,
>         PART_CID_STOCK=1, PART_CID_STOCK_LESS=1, TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1=2.1]
>
>   

I've reduced the score of the rules. I've seen those rules hit on 
messages with a single embedded GIF coming from Outloook or OE from a 
user just trying to make their mail look pretty.