Group concat Impl

[nitin jha <jh...@gmail.com>]

Hi James,

As * Group concat *requirement is so critical to us, i am forced to choose
other stack(Shark+hive) to implement. And i don't want to change it from
phoenix to shark+hive. I am aware you may have n numbers of priority items
in your list hence proposing my contribution to it.

Is it any way i can contribute to this? or is there any workaround which u
can suggest for me to implement on my own?

Appreciate any help on this.

Regards,
Nitin

Re: Group concat Impl

[Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>]

Hi Nitin,

Is there an open ticket for this feature? Could you file one?

Thanks,
Nick

On Monday, June 9, 2014, nitin jha <jh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> As * Group concat *requirement is so critical to us, i am forced to choose
> other stack(Shark+hive) to implement. And i don't want to change it from
> phoenix to shark+hive. I am aware you may have n numbers of priority items
> in your list hence proposing my contribution to it.
>
> Is it any way i can contribute to this? or is there any workaround which u
> can suggest for me to implement on my own?
>
> Appreciate any help on this.
>
> Regards,
> Nitin
>