You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@continuum.apache.org by Shaun Barriball <sb...@yahoo.co.uk> on 2007/05/22 19:12:40 UTC
User Interface Performance of 1.1
Are there any known ways to improve the performance of Continuum - as per
the issue below?
> Issue 2 - Performance
> ----------------------
> Out of the box Continuum 1.1 appears much, much slower than 1.0.3. For
> example, it takes 30 secs+ after I click "MyBigProject" to display the
> contents of the Project Group which has 10 Projects.
>
> Are there any logging settings/go faster buttons that would help
> improve performance?
Regards,
Shaun.
RE: User Interface Performance of 1.1
Posted by "McNaught, Ewen" <Du...@intuit.com>.
We're using the default db.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:29 PM
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: User Interface Performance of 1.1
what kinda database are you using for it?
if its the embedded one you'll have to copy the right stuff around, if
its postgres or mysql it should just be a matter of pointing it at the
db..
jesse
On 5/22/07, McNaught, Ewen <Du...@intuit.com> wrote:
> I've been running on continuum-20070502.030000.tar
> Will I be able to upgrade to the alpha-2 for the performance improvements without having to re-add my projects? (We have over 70)
> --Duncan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel@venisse.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:17 PM
> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Re: User Interface Performance of 1.1
>
> Performance are fixed in alpha-2 that will be available in few days.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Shaun Barriball a écrit :
> > Are there any known ways to improve the performance of Continuum - as per
> > the issue below?
> >
> >> Issue 2 - Performance
> >> ----------------------
> >> Out of the box Continuum 1.1 appears much, much slower than 1.0.3. For
> >> example, it takes 30 secs+ after I click "MyBigProject" to display the
> >> contents of the Project Group which has 10 Projects.
> >>
> >> Are there any logging settings/go faster buttons that would help
> >> improve performance?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Shaun.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
Re: User Interface Performance of 1.1
Posted by Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>.
what kinda database are you using for it?
if its the embedded one you'll have to copy the right stuff around, if
its postgres or mysql it should just be a matter of pointing it at the
db..
jesse
On 5/22/07, McNaught, Ewen <Du...@intuit.com> wrote:
> I've been running on continuum-20070502.030000.tar
> Will I be able to upgrade to the alpha-2 for the performance improvements without having to re-add my projects? (We have over 70)
> --Duncan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel@venisse.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:17 PM
> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Re: User Interface Performance of 1.1
>
> Performance are fixed in alpha-2 that will be available in few days.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Shaun Barriball a écrit :
> > Are there any known ways to improve the performance of Continuum - as per
> > the issue below?
> >
> >> Issue 2 - Performance
> >> ----------------------
> >> Out of the box Continuum 1.1 appears much, much slower than 1.0.3. For
> >> example, it takes 30 secs+ after I click "MyBigProject" to display the
> >> contents of the Project Group which has 10 Projects.
> >>
> >> Are there any logging settings/go faster buttons that would help
> >> improve performance?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Shaun.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
RE: User Interface Performance of 1.1
Posted by "McNaught, Ewen" <Du...@intuit.com>.
I've been running on continuum-20070502.030000.tar
Will I be able to upgrade to the alpha-2 for the performance improvements without having to re-add my projects? (We have over 70)
--Duncan
-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel@venisse.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:17 PM
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: User Interface Performance of 1.1
Performance are fixed in alpha-2 that will be available in few days.
Emmanuel
Shaun Barriball a écrit :
> Are there any known ways to improve the performance of Continuum - as per
> the issue below?
>
>> Issue 2 - Performance
>> ----------------------
>> Out of the box Continuum 1.1 appears much, much slower than 1.0.3. For
>> example, it takes 30 secs+ after I click "MyBigProject" to display the
>> contents of the Project Group which has 10 Projects.
>>
>> Are there any logging settings/go faster buttons that would help
>> improve performance?
>
>
> Regards,
> Shaun.
>
>
>
>
Re: User Interface Performance of 1.1
Posted by Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>.
well, 1.0.3 and 1.1 use a completely different web layer for rendering
the pages...
I think 1.0.3 used velocity and 1.1 is using jsp's and webwork, which
was folded into struct2 and isn't even actually being developed
anymore as webwork.
its kind of a catch-22, take the time to convert everything over to
struts2, which may or may not take much time and further delay getting
continuum 1.1 moving along, or just get 1.1 out and work on converting
to struts2 or something else even for 1.2 or 2.0 whichever we end up
moving on after this...
personally, I want to get 1.1 out in a usable state sooner at this
point, its been hanging around too long in an unreleased state. :)
jesse
On 6/4/07, L. J. <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I meant to say the performance in general compare to 1.0.3 especially
> page loading while switching pages.
>
> Thanks.
>
> LJ
>
> On 6/4/07, Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > your still getting 30 second page loads on screens like the project
> > group summary and members pages?
> >
> > jesse
> >
> > On 6/4/07, L. J. <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is it just me or anyone else experience the same, alpha-2 does not seem
> > to
> > > perform any faster than alpha-1
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > LJ
> > >
> > > On 5/22/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Performance are fixed in alpha-2 that will be available in few days.
> > > >
> > > > Emmanuel
> > > >
> > > > Shaun Barriball a écrit :
> > > > > Are there any known ways to improve the performance of Continuum -
> > as
> > > > per
> > > > > the issue below?
> > > > >
> > > > >> Issue 2 - Performance
> > > > >> ----------------------
> > > > >> Out of the box Continuum 1.1 appears much, much slower than 1.0.3.
> > For
> > > > >> example, it takes 30 secs+ after I click "MyBigProject" to display
> > the
> > > > >> contents of the Project Group which has 10 Projects.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Are there any logging settings/go faster buttons that would help
> > > > >> improve performance?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Shaun.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > jesse mcconnell
> > jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
> >
>
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
Re: User Interface Performance of 1.1
Posted by "L. J." <ap...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, I meant to say the performance in general compare to 1.0.3 especially
page loading while switching pages.
Thanks.
LJ
On 6/4/07, Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> your still getting 30 second page loads on screens like the project
> group summary and members pages?
>
> jesse
>
> On 6/4/07, L. J. <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it just me or anyone else experience the same, alpha-2 does not seem
> to
> > perform any faster than alpha-1
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > LJ
> >
> > On 5/22/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Performance are fixed in alpha-2 that will be available in few days.
> > >
> > > Emmanuel
> > >
> > > Shaun Barriball a écrit :
> > > > Are there any known ways to improve the performance of Continuum -
> as
> > > per
> > > > the issue below?
> > > >
> > > >> Issue 2 - Performance
> > > >> ----------------------
> > > >> Out of the box Continuum 1.1 appears much, much slower than 1.0.3.
> For
> > > >> example, it takes 30 secs+ after I click "MyBigProject" to display
> the
> > > >> contents of the Project Group which has 10 Projects.
> > > >>
> > > >> Are there any logging settings/go faster buttons that would help
> > > >> improve performance?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Shaun.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> jesse mcconnell
> jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
>
Re: User Interface Performance of 1.1
Posted by Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>.
your still getting 30 second page loads on screens like the project
group summary and members pages?
jesse
On 6/4/07, L. J. <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it just me or anyone else experience the same, alpha-2 does not seem to
> perform any faster than alpha-1
>
> Thanks.
>
> LJ
>
> On 5/22/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> >
> > Performance are fixed in alpha-2 that will be available in few days.
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> > Shaun Barriball a écrit :
> > > Are there any known ways to improve the performance of Continuum - as
> > per
> > > the issue below?
> > >
> > >> Issue 2 - Performance
> > >> ----------------------
> > >> Out of the box Continuum 1.1 appears much, much slower than 1.0.3. For
> > >> example, it takes 30 secs+ after I click "MyBigProject" to display the
> > >> contents of the Project Group which has 10 Projects.
> > >>
> > >> Are there any logging settings/go faster buttons that would help
> > >> improve performance?
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Shaun.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
Re: User Interface Performance of 1.1
Posted by "L. J." <ap...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Is it just me or anyone else experience the same, alpha-2 does not seem to
perform any faster than alpha-1
Thanks.
LJ
On 5/22/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>
> Performance are fixed in alpha-2 that will be available in few days.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Shaun Barriball a écrit :
> > Are there any known ways to improve the performance of Continuum - as
> per
> > the issue below?
> >
> >> Issue 2 - Performance
> >> ----------------------
> >> Out of the box Continuum 1.1 appears much, much slower than 1.0.3. For
> >> example, it takes 30 secs+ after I click "MyBigProject" to display the
> >> contents of the Project Group which has 10 Projects.
> >>
> >> Are there any logging settings/go faster buttons that would help
> >> improve performance?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Shaun.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
RE: User Interface Performance of 1.1
Posted by Shaun Barriball <sb...@yahoo.co.uk>.
Thanks Emmanuel.
We're using the embedded database. Is it faster on MySql out of interest?
Regards,
Shaun.
-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel@venisse.net]
Sent: 22 May 2007 19:17
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: User Interface Performance of 1.1
Performance are fixed in alpha-2 that will be available in few days.
Emmanuel
Shaun Barriball a écrit :
> Are there any known ways to improve the performance of Continuum - as
> per the issue below?
>
>> Issue 2 - Performance
>> ----------------------
>> Out of the box Continuum 1.1 appears much, much slower than 1.0.3.
>> For example, it takes 30 secs+ after I click "MyBigProject" to
>> display the contents of the Project Group which has 10 Projects.
>>
>> Are there any logging settings/go faster buttons that would help
>> improve performance?
>
>
> Regards,
> Shaun.
>
>
>
>
Re: User Interface Performance of 1.1
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Performance are fixed in alpha-2 that will be available in few days.
Emmanuel
Shaun Barriball a écrit :
> Are there any known ways to improve the performance of Continuum - as per
> the issue below?
>
>> Issue 2 - Performance
>> ----------------------
>> Out of the box Continuum 1.1 appears much, much slower than 1.0.3. For
>> example, it takes 30 secs+ after I click "MyBigProject" to display the
>> contents of the Project Group which has 10 Projects.
>>
>> Are there any logging settings/go faster buttons that would help
>> improve performance?
>
>
> Regards,
> Shaun.
>
>
>
>