You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Keiron Liddle <ke...@aftexsw.com> on 2002/11/29 09:37:46 UTC
Re: Forresbot WANTED
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 09:27, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > So newer versions will work. The patch cannot be applied to cocoon cvs
> > as fop releases are coming from a branch.
> >
> > So how can we proceed. I would like it to be using fop cvs but this is
> > not really feasible at the moment.
>
> Why?
>
> Cocoon 2.1 is in alpha.
alpha+alpha makes a bit of a difference.
> If the patch works and fixes the problem, personally I have no problem
> in patching current Cocoon HEAD (and Forrest). Personally that is, we
> should hear others... with these versions, what are the problems that
> instead come up? Are they stable enough?
It works fine for me (with fop docs), but not really extensively tested.
What about people with other stylesheets which might expose problems and
things like Korean language with embedded fonts, this will definitely
not work at the moment.
We certainly want to work on these things (feedback etc.) but it is hard
to say when it will be stable enough for general use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Forresbot WANTED
Posted by Keiron Liddle <ke...@aftexsw.com>.
oops, wrong mailing list.
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 09:37, Keiron Liddle wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 09:27, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > > So newer versions will work. The patch cannot be applied to cocoon cvs
> > > as fop releases are coming from a branch.
> > >
> > > So how can we proceed. I would like it to be using fop cvs but this is
> > > not really feasible at the moment.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > Cocoon 2.1 is in alpha.
>
> alpha+alpha makes a bit of a difference.
>
> > If the patch works and fixes the problem, personally I have no problem
> > in patching current Cocoon HEAD (and Forrest). Personally that is, we
> > should hear others... with these versions, what are the problems that
> > instead come up? Are they stable enough?
>
> It works fine for me (with fop docs), but not really extensively tested.
> What about people with other stylesheets which might expose problems and
> things like Korean language with embedded fonts, this will definitely
> not work at the moment.
>
> We certainly want to work on these things (feedback etc.) but it is hard
> to say when it will be stable enough for general use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org