You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Vladimir Ozerov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/06/13 18:14:00 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (CALCITE-4616) AggregateUnionTransposeRule causes
row type mismatch when some inputs have unique grouping key
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Vladimir Ozerov reassigned CALCITE-4616:
----------------------------------------
Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov
> AggregateUnionTransposeRule causes row type mismatch when some inputs have unique grouping key
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-4616
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4616
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.26.0
> Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
> Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov
> Priority: Major
>
> Consider the following relational tree:
> {code}
> 1: Aggregate[group=a, SUM(b)]
> 2: Union
> 3: Input1[a, b, c]
> 4: Input2[a, b, c]
> {code}
> It may happen, that {{Input1}} has a unique key on {{[a]}}. In this case, Apache Calcite, will not install the {{Aggregate}} on top of it, which leads to the following tree:
> {code}
> 1: Aggregate[group=a, SUM(b)]
> 2: Union
> 3: Input1[a, b, c]
> 4: Aggregate[group=a, SUM(b)]
> 5: Input2[a, b, c]
> {code}
> Obviously, the tree is incorrect, because {{Union}} inputs now have different row types.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)