You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com> on 2015/05/21 17:30:52 UTC

Re: svn commit: r1680905 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS docs/manual/mod/mod_ssl.xml modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c modules/ssl/ssl_private.h

Just a reminder to not loose rjung's comment...

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:27 PM,  <yl...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1680905&r1=1680904&r2=1680905&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Thu May 21 15:27:54 2015
> @@ -108,24 +108,6 @@ PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>       ylavic: trunk/2.4.x not concerned, 2.2.x only.
>       +1: ylavic, jkaluza, wrowe
>
> -   * mod_ssl: Add support for configuring persistent TLS session ticket
> -     encryption/decryption keys (useful for clustered environments).
> -     [Paul Querna, Kaspar Brand]
> -     trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1200040
> -                  http://svn.apache.org/r1200372
> -                  http://svn.apache.org/r1200374
> -                  http://svn.apache.org/r1213380
> -     2.2.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.2.x-SSLSessionTicketKeyFile.patch
> -     +1: ylavic, wrowe, rjung
> -     rjung: Minor nits you can IMHO apply as CTR:
> -            - in mod_ssl.c the info string for SessionTicketKeyFile contains
> -              '/path/to/file', whereas existing directives use `/path/to/file'.
> -              The first quotation mark is of different style.
> -            - enhance docs note about frequent key file rotation by info that one also needs
> -              to restart the web server in order for the changed file to take effect
> -              (either gracefully or not). Would be useful for 2.4/trunk as well
> -            - mention RFC 5077 in CHANGES