[NOTICE] 2.0.0-beta branch to be created Friday from trunk

[Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>]

Since it looks like we still have some performance and cleanup work
before we create a 2.0.0 release, several of us were chatting off-line
and decided that a 2.0.0-beta instead of a 2.0.0-M4 would be more
appropriate, given we're passing the TCK and have made significant
progress towards a 2.0.0 release.

Therefore, I'll create a 2.0.0-beta branch from trunk around Noon
tomorrow and will post a release candidate to vote on sometime in the
next couple days (after the branch passes the junits and TCK runs.)


Thanks,
Donald

Re: [NOTICE] 2.0.0-beta branch to be created Friday from trunk

[Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>]

2.0.0-beta branch has been created at -
   https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/2.0.0-beta/

Please don't check any changes into that branch unless it is a critical
fix and has been verified not to cause any regressions on Derby, DB2,
Oracle and MS SQL Server.

Thanks,
Donald


On 1/22/10 12:26 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> I'm running builds/tests across all of the automated databases and
> against the 1.0 and 2.0 TCKs now, which should take a couple more hours.
> 
> Once those look good (no new regressions) I'll cut the branch.
> 
> 
> -Donald
> 
> 
> On 1/21/10 1:05 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> Since it looks like we still have some performance and cleanup work
>> before we create a 2.0.0 release, several of us were chatting off-line
>> and decided that a 2.0.0-beta instead of a 2.0.0-M4 would be more
>> appropriate, given we're passing the TCK and have made significant
>> progress towards a 2.0.0 release.
>>
>> Therefore, I'll create a 2.0.0-beta branch from trunk around Noon
>> tomorrow and will post a release candidate to vote on sometime in the
>> next couple days (after the branch passes the junits and TCK runs.)
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Donald
>>
> 

Re: [NOTICE] 2.0.0-beta branch to be created Friday from trunk

[Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>]

I'm running builds/tests across all of the automated databases and
against the 1.0 and 2.0 TCKs now, which should take a couple more hours.

Once those look good (no new regressions) I'll cut the branch.


-Donald


On 1/21/10 1:05 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Since it looks like we still have some performance and cleanup work
> before we create a 2.0.0 release, several of us were chatting off-line
> and decided that a 2.0.0-beta instead of a 2.0.0-M4 would be more
> appropriate, given we're passing the TCK and have made significant
> progress towards a 2.0.0 release.
> 
> Therefore, I'll create a 2.0.0-beta branch from trunk around Noon
> tomorrow and will post a release candidate to vote on sometime in the
> next couple days (after the branch passes the junits and TCK runs.)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Donald
>