You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2010/04/15 06:42:19 UTC
0.20.4RC1? (WAS -> Re: Vote on 0.20.3.1)
Unless objection, I was going to put up a 0.20.4 Release Candidate 1
made from the tip of the 0.20_pre_durability branch tomorrow.
Andrew, I was thinking you could level your ec2 guns at the RC or,
would you rather me wait and let you go at the tip of the branch
first? Just say.
Anything else we need to get in before I cut the candidate?
Thanks,
St.Ack
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like this. With no durability goal, we should be able to hit this in
> short order. HDFS is not ready for the claim as of yet.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> I went through the list issues that we had filed against a 0.20.4. I
>> moved out the issues that depend on hdfs-200, post rpc-version change,
>> etc. Outstanding are ~15 issues: http://su.pr/1TLvb7 A good few are
>> patch available. A couple of others are small doc issues. I'll take
>> care of the easy ones this evening. Please go over the list
>> yourselves to see what else we should include. As is, the list
>> includes hbase-2248. I think we should try and get this one in if
>> only to make the release a little interesting (and to fix the
>> deadlock). We also need to fix the json jar issue so we have chance
>> of being debian package.
>>
>> St.Ack
>> P.S. I haven't voted yet. At the moment I'm +0. If hbase-2248 goes
>> in, I'd go +1.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Implied is we move people to 0.20.5 rather than do a patch on 0.20.4, beyond the RC period.
>>>
>>> Hence it's even more important that J-D cherry pick bugfixes out of 0.20.4-dev for an 0.20.4 RC and release.
>>>
>>> Is that acceptable?
>>>
>>> - Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: Vote on 0.20.3.1
>>>> To: "hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
>>>> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 3:35 PM
>>>> > From: Jonathan Gray
>>>> >
>>>> > The issue would be that we break out 0.20.4 to make an
>>>> RC.
>>>> > Now we have to patch 3 separate trees for each bug fix
>>>> (0.20.4,
>>>> > 0.20.5, and 0.21).
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I grant you that. But only during the RC.
>>>>
>>>> - Andy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: 0.20.4RC1? (WAS -> Re: Vote on 0.20.3.1)
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> I'm cool with an rc, but what is our timeline for testing? Given we just
> committed 2248, which is a pretty huge change, I think we should let it soak
> for developers for at least a week or so before moving from rc to release?
>
For sure. RCs are out for a week or so usually.
Good on you Todd,
St.Ack
> -Todd
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> Unless objection, I was going to put up a 0.20.4 Release Candidate 1
>> made from the tip of the 0.20_pre_durability branch tomorrow.
>>
>> Andrew, I was thinking you could level your ec2 guns at the RC or,
>> would you rather me wait and let you go at the tip of the branch
>> first? Just say.
>>
>> Anything else we need to get in before I cut the candidate?
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I like this. With no durability goal, we should be able to hit this in
>> > short order. HDFS is not ready for the claim as of yet.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> >> I went through the list issues that we had filed against a 0.20.4. I
>> >> moved out the issues that depend on hdfs-200, post rpc-version change,
>> >> etc. Outstanding are ~15 issues: http://su.pr/1TLvb7 A good few are
>> >> patch available. A couple of others are small doc issues. I'll take
>> >> care of the easy ones this evening. Please go over the list
>> >> yourselves to see what else we should include. As is, the list
>> >> includes hbase-2248. I think we should try and get this one in if
>> >> only to make the release a little interesting (and to fix the
>> >> deadlock). We also need to fix the json jar issue so we have chance
>> >> of being debian package.
>> >>
>> >> St.Ack
>> >> P.S. I haven't voted yet. At the moment I'm +0. If hbase-2248 goes
>> >> in, I'd go +1.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> Implied is we move people to 0.20.5 rather than do a patch on 0.20.4,
>> beyond the RC period.
>> >>>
>> >>> Hence it's even more important that J-D cherry pick bugfixes out of
>> 0.20.4-dev for an 0.20.4 RC and release.
>> >>>
>> >>> Is that acceptable?
>> >>>
>> >>> - Andy
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> From: Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> >>>> Subject: Re: Vote on 0.20.3.1
>> >>>> To: "hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
>> >>>> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 3:35 PM
>> >>>> > From: Jonathan Gray
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > The issue would be that we break out 0.20.4 to make an
>> >>>> RC.
>> >>>> > Now we have to patch 3 separate trees for each bug fix
>> >>>> (0.20.4,
>> >>>> > 0.20.5, and 0.21).
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ok, I grant you that. But only during the RC.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> - Andy
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
Re: 0.20.4RC1? (WAS -> Re: Vote on 0.20.3.1)
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
I'm cool with an rc, but what is our timeline for testing? Given we just
committed 2248, which is a pretty huge change, I think we should let it soak
for developers for at least a week or so before moving from rc to release?
-Todd
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Unless objection, I was going to put up a 0.20.4 Release Candidate 1
> made from the tip of the 0.20_pre_durability branch tomorrow.
>
> Andrew, I was thinking you could level your ec2 guns at the RC or,
> would you rather me wait and let you go at the tip of the branch
> first? Just say.
>
> Anything else we need to get in before I cut the candidate?
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I like this. With no durability goal, we should be able to hit this in
> > short order. HDFS is not ready for the claim as of yet.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >> I went through the list issues that we had filed against a 0.20.4. I
> >> moved out the issues that depend on hdfs-200, post rpc-version change,
> >> etc. Outstanding are ~15 issues: http://su.pr/1TLvb7 A good few are
> >> patch available. A couple of others are small doc issues. I'll take
> >> care of the easy ones this evening. Please go over the list
> >> yourselves to see what else we should include. As is, the list
> >> includes hbase-2248. I think we should try and get this one in if
> >> only to make the release a little interesting (and to fix the
> >> deadlock). We also need to fix the json jar issue so we have chance
> >> of being debian package.
> >>
> >> St.Ack
> >> P.S. I haven't voted yet. At the moment I'm +0. If hbase-2248 goes
> >> in, I'd go +1.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Implied is we move people to 0.20.5 rather than do a patch on 0.20.4,
> beyond the RC period.
> >>>
> >>> Hence it's even more important that J-D cherry pick bugfixes out of
> 0.20.4-dev for an 0.20.4 RC and release.
> >>>
> >>> Is that acceptable?
> >>>
> >>> - Andy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> From: Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> >>>> Subject: Re: Vote on 0.20.3.1
> >>>> To: "hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
> >>>> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 3:35 PM
> >>>> > From: Jonathan Gray
> >>>> >
> >>>> > The issue would be that we break out 0.20.4 to make an
> >>>> RC.
> >>>> > Now we have to patch 3 separate trees for each bug fix
> >>>> (0.20.4,
> >>>> > 0.20.5, and 0.21).
> >>>>
> >>>> Ok, I grant you that. But only during the RC.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Andy
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: 0.20.4RC1? (WAS -> Re: Vote on 0.20.3.1)
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
... after HBASE-2451 goes in...
> Let's cut an RC and I'll run the full suite of benchmarks
> on it up on EC2. That will beat it up. It will take a couple
> of days to complete them.
Re: 0.20.4RC1? (WAS -> Re: Vote on 0.20.3.1)
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
> Unless objection, I was going to put up a 0.20.4 Release
> Candidate 1 made from the tip of the 0.20_pre_durability
> branch tomorrow.
>
> Andrew, I was thinking you could level your ec2 guns at the
> RC or, would you rather me wait and let you go at the tip
> of the branch first? Just say.
Let's cut an RC and I'll run the full suite of benchmarks on it up on EC2. That will beat it up. It will take a couple of days to complete them.
- Andy