You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2007/04/13 21:17:50 UTC
Heads-up Contribution Service refactoring
I'm planning to make some refactoring on the contribution services in order
to follow the same package naming convention as other modules are using, and
to group related things on it's own packages and make things clear on the
contribution service. Below is what I'm thinking as the structure to use :
Contribution module
- Models org.apache.tuscany.contribution
- SPI org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service
- SPI (processor) org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.processor
Contribution-impl module
- Service Impl org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.impl
- Processor Impl
org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.processor.impl
- Util org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.util
As part of the refactoring, I'll also try to identify obsolete files and get
rid of them (e.g some files on extension package).
I'll try to work on this in the afternoon PST timezone, and would try to be
as less disruptive as possible and fix all consumers of the contribution
service.Please let me know if you have any comments or questions...
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
Re: Heads-up Contribution Service refactoring
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Luciano Resende wrote:
> One other small detail I noticed... We have ArtifactProcessors, and
> ContributionPackageProcessors, should these be called only
> PackageProcessors
> ?
>
Yes, Contribution is already in the package name anyway. I'll rename
this one as well.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Heads-up Contribution Service refactoring
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
One other small detail I noticed... We have ArtifactProcessors, and
ContributionPackageProcessors, should these be called only PackageProcessors
?
On 4/14/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Luciano Resende wrote:
> > I'm planning to make some refactoring on the contribution services in
> > order
> > to follow the same package naming convention as other modules are
> > using, and
> > to group related things on it's own packages and make things clear on
> the
> > contribution service. Below is what I'm thinking as the structure to
> > use :
> >
> > Contribution module
> >
> > - Models org.apache.tuscany.contribution
> > - SPI org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service
> > - SPI (processor) org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.processor
> >
> > Contribution-impl module
> >
> > - Service Impl org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.impl
> > - Processor Impl
> > org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.processor.impl
> > - Util
> > org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.util
> >
> >
> > As part of the refactoring, I'll also try to identify obsolete files
> > and get
> > rid of them (e.g some files on extension package).
> >
> > I'll try to work on this in the afternoon PST timezone, and would try
> > to be
> > as less disruptive as possible and fix all consumers of the contribution
> > service.Please let me know if you have any comments or questions...
> >
>
> Luciano, the package structure looks good now. On top of your changes,
> I'm going to do a much smaller refactoring and rename the *Registry to
> *ExtensionPoint to be consistent with our other extension points. I'll
> make sure I don't break anything either :)
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
Re: Heads-up Contribution Service refactoring
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Luciano Resende wrote:
> I'm planning to make some refactoring on the contribution services in
> order
> to follow the same package naming convention as other modules are
> using, and
> to group related things on it's own packages and make things clear on the
> contribution service. Below is what I'm thinking as the structure to
> use :
>
> Contribution module
>
> - Models org.apache.tuscany.contribution
> - SPI org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service
> - SPI (processor) org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.processor
>
> Contribution-impl module
>
> - Service Impl org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.impl
> - Processor Impl
> org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.processor.impl
> - Util
> org.apache.tuscany.contribution.service.util
>
>
> As part of the refactoring, I'll also try to identify obsolete files
> and get
> rid of them (e.g some files on extension package).
>
> I'll try to work on this in the afternoon PST timezone, and would try
> to be
> as less disruptive as possible and fix all consumers of the contribution
> service.Please let me know if you have any comments or questions...
>
Luciano, the package structure looks good now. On top of your changes,
I'm going to do a much smaller refactoring and rename the *Registry to
*ExtensionPoint to be consistent with our other extension points. I'll
make sure I don't break anything either :)
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org