[GitHub] [spark] HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in pull request #38218: [SPARK-40587][CONNECT][FOLLOW-UP] Make sure python client support select *

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

HyukjinKwon commented on code in PR #38218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38218#discussion_r995368596


##########
python/pyspark/sql/connect/plan.py:
##########
@@ -143,23 +143,29 @@ def __init__(self, child: Optional["LogicalPlan"], *columns: "ExpressionOrString
         self._verify_expressions()
 
     def _verify_expressions(self) -> None:
-        """Ensures that all input arguments are instances of Expression."""
+        """Ensures that all input arguments are instances of Expression or String."""
         for c in self._raw_columns:
-            if not isinstance(c, Expression):
-                raise InputValidationError(f"Only Expressions can be used for projections: '{c}'.")
+            if not isinstance(c, (Expression, str)):
+                raise InputValidationError(
+                    f"Only Expressions or String can be used for projections: '{c}'."
+                )
 
     def withAlias(self, alias: str) -> LogicalPlan:
         self.alias = alias
         return self
 
     def plan(self, session: Optional["RemoteSparkSession"]) -> proto.Relation:
         assert self._child is not None
-        proj_exprs = [
-            c.to_plan(session)
-            if isinstance(c, Expression)
-            else self.unresolved_attr(*(c.split(".")))
-            for c in self._raw_columns
-        ]
+        proj_exprs = []
+        for c in self._raw_columns:
+            if isinstance(c, Expression):
+                proj_exprs.append(c.to_plan(session))
+            elif c == "*":
+                exp = proto.Expression()
+                exp.unresolved_star.SetInParent()
+                proj_exprs.append(exp)
+            else:
+                proj_exprs.append(self.unresolved_attr(*(c.split("."))))

Review Comment:
   Hm, I feel like we shouldn't/can't handle the dot separation here. What about backquotes? And it would be more compliated when we support other `GetItem-like` syntax here



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org