You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/03/13 15:21:46 UTC
[jira] Commented: (SLING-326) Rename µjax to "sling client library"
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12578306#action_12578306 ]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-326:
----------------------------------------
I think we should also rename the "ujax:" prefix to "sling:" for the request parameters
Btw, the sling client library is one of the greatest things on earth, so it deserves the name catapult.
> Rename µjax to "sling client library"
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-326
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-326
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
> Priority: Minor
>
> As discussed recently [1], reducing the number of names for the different sling components should help people make sense of it.
> The idea is to rename the µjax stuff to "sling client library", and I suppose the UjaxPostServlet can be renamed to SlingPostServlet?
> There were some discussions about using "catapult" for the name, but that's so good a name that we'll keep it in store for later ;-)
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/5yeuwlbsj6m7da6o
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Cute name for Sling Client Library: Catapult (Re: [jira] Commented: (SLING-326) Rename µjax to "sling client library")
Posted by Peter Svensson <ps...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Felix Meschberger wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Once upon a time Carsten proposed "Catapult" when we were looking for a
> > name - it escapes my memory, what exactly it was ;-)
> >
> > Now we are more closely integrating µjax into Sling as the Sling Client
> > Library. And of course, the famous "Catapult" is put back in action.
> >
> > I would like to take this up and put it for discussion, that we
> > code-name the Sling Client Library as "Catapult".
> >
> > Internally, we would still use sling: as prefix. But we might name the
> > client side java script file catapult.js...
> >
> > WDYT ?
> >
> Juppy, yes, yes, yes, please :)
>
> Big +1
>
> Carsten
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziegeler@apache.org
>
Re: Cute name for Sling Client Library: Catapult (Re: [jira] Commented: (SLING-326) Rename µjax to "sling client library")
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Once upon a time Carsten proposed "Catapult" when we were looking for a
> name - it escapes my memory, what exactly it was ;-)
>
> Now we are more closely integrating µjax into Sling as the Sling Client
> Library. And of course, the famous "Catapult" is put back in action.
>
> I would like to take this up and put it for discussion, that we
> code-name the Sling Client Library as "Catapult".
>
> Internally, we would still use sling: as prefix. But we might name the
> client side java script file catapult.js...
>
> WDYT ?
>
Juppy, yes, yes, yes, please :)
Big +1
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org
Cute name for Sling Client Library: Catapult (Re: [jira] Commented: (SLING-326) Rename µjax to "sling client library")
Posted by Felix Meschberger <fm...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
Once upon a time Carsten proposed "Catapult" when we were looking for a
name - it escapes my memory, what exactly it was ;-)
Now we are more closely integrating µjax into Sling as the Sling Client
Library. And of course, the famous "Catapult" is put back in action.
I would like to take this up and put it for discussion, that we
code-name the Sling Client Library as "Catapult".
Internally, we would still use sling: as prefix. But we might name the
client side java script file catapult.js...
WDYT ?
Regards
Felix