You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jclouds.apache.org by Andrew Phillips <no...@github.com> on 2013/12/11 09:33:50 UTC
[jclouds-karaf] Remove Sonatype extension profile (#28)
No longer used since we're now at the ASF ;-)
Also intended to see how BuildHive and DEV@cloud behave, after our problems with #24
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf remove-sonatype-ext
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/28
-- Commit Summary --
* Removing empty lines
* Removing Sonatype extension profile
-- File Changes --
M pom.xml (27)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/28.patch
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/28.diff
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Remove Sonatype extension profile (#28)
Posted by Andrew Phillips <no...@github.com>.
> jclouds-karaf-pull-requests #22 UNSTABLE
No failures but [two tests skipped](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/org.apache.jclouds.karaf$itests/22/testReport/), for some reason..?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/28#issuecomment-30305670
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Remove Sonatype extension profile (#28)
Posted by Andrew Phillips <no...@github.com>.
> jclouds-karaf-pull-requests #22 UNSTABLE
Ah...the skipped tests are intended (also skipped in BuildHive). It's _Checkstyle_ that's causing the build to go unstable in DEV@cloud.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/28#issuecomment-30311299
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Remove Sonatype extension profile (#28)
Posted by CloudBees pull request builder plugin <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests #26](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/26/) UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/28#issuecomment-33606293
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Remove Sonatype extension profile (#28)
Posted by Andrew Phillips <no...@github.com>.
@iocanel While you're looking at Karaf...does this one look OK?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/28#issuecomment-33581977
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Remove Sonatype extension profile (#28)
Posted by BuildHive <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds » jclouds-karaf #617](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/617/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/28#issuecomment-30307197
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Remove Sonatype extension profile (#28)
Posted by Andrew Phillips <no...@github.com>.
@abayer @nacx: Could either of you have a quick look at this? Thanks!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/28#issuecomment-31072431
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Remove Sonatype extension profile (#28)
Posted by CloudBees pull request builder plugin <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests #22](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/22/) UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/28#issuecomment-30305301
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Remove Sonatype extension profile (#28)
Posted by Andrew Phillips <no...@github.com>.
> jclouds » jclouds-karaf #698 UNSTABLE
No _new_ itest failures here...not sure what is going on with these, though. @iocanel Any ideas? Seems to have [started here](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/689/), caused by...erm...me with [the Guava change](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/787/)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/28#issuecomment-33613056