You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Alan Knowles <al...@akbkhome.com> on 2004/07/15 01:59:06 UTC

Re: Subversion 1.1.0 Release (fsfs as default?)

Ben Reser wrote:

>The first release candidate of Subversion 1.1.0 is ready and available .....
>  
>
Congrats - I've been using the fsfs backend for about 3 months? (No 
issues whatsoever.) - Are there any plans to make to the default 
backend, From my watching the mailing list, it would remove 20-30% of 
the posts here.

Regards
Alan


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Subversion 1.1.0 Release (fsfs as default?)

Posted by Mark Phippard <Ma...@softlanding.com>.
Alan Knowles <al...@akbkhome.com> wrote on 07/14/2004 09:59:06 PM:

> Ben Reser wrote:
> 
> >The first release candidate of Subversion 1.1.0 is ready and available 
.....
> > 
> >
> Congrats - I've been using the fsfs backend for about 3 months? (No 
> issues whatsoever.) - Are there any plans to make to the default 
> backend, From my watching the mailing list, it would remove 20-30% of 
> the posts here.

It wouldn't really make sense to do that in the first release in which it 
appears.  I think we would want to see it used for a while so that some 
knowledge could be built up about any unforeseen problems and recovery 
issues as well as performance.  Once it has been out there for a while, I 
would suspect that it would eventually become the default in a future 
release.

Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Subversion 1.1.0 Release (fsfs as default?)

Posted by Mark Phippard <Ma...@softlanding.com>.
Alan Knowles <al...@akbkhome.com> wrote on 07/14/2004 09:59:06 PM:

> Ben Reser wrote:
> 
> >The first release candidate of Subversion 1.1.0 is ready and available 
.....
> > 
> >
> Congrats - I've been using the fsfs backend for about 3 months? (No 
> issues whatsoever.) - Are there any plans to make to the default 
> backend, From my watching the mailing list, it would remove 20-30% of 
> the posts here.

It wouldn't really make sense to do that in the first release in which it 
appears.  I think we would want to see it used for a while so that some 
knowledge could be built up about any unforeseen problems and recovery 
issues as well as performance.  Once it has been out there for a while, I 
would suspect that it would eventually become the default in a future 
release.

Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org