You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@click.apache.org by Andrei Ionescu <ai...@yahoo.com> on 2010/07/21 12:21:40 UTC
Ohloh data about click not quite actual.
Lot's of users when compare Click to other projects, point out as a
"disadvantage" of Click the data from Ohloh.net.
I haven't used that before, and I'm not sure why it's the "authority" in
the open source scene, but those statistics there for Click look quite
outdated (e.g. last commit is from January) and make Click look less
valuable than it is.
regards,
Andrei.
Re: Ohloh data about click not quite actual.
Posted by Andrei Ionescu <ai...@yahoo.com>.
> Are you looking at the LOC chart? It is yearly chart
> that runs from Jan-2000 to Jan-2010
Yes :D.
Most who pointed at it, interpreted that Click development stopped on
Jan 2010, even if I showed them the Fisheye link of Click SVN :).
Andrei.
Re: Ohloh data about click not quite actual.
Posted by Bob Schellink <sa...@gmail.com>.
On 26/07/2010 19:38, Andrei Ionescu wrote:
>> Looks up to date to me:
>>
>> https://www.ohloh.net/p/apache-click/commits
> The charts that most people look at, are not:
> https://www.ohloh.net/p/apache-click/analyses/latest
I don't follow. That page states: "Updated 26 Jul 2010 02:59 UTC"
Where does it say it hasn't updated since Jan? Are you looking at the LOC chart? It is yearly chart
that runs from Jan-2000 to Jan-2010
Bob
Re: Ohloh data about click not quite actual.
Posted by Andrei Ionescu <ai...@yahoo.com>.
> Looks up to date to me:
>
> https://www.ohloh.net/p/apache-click/commits
The charts that most people look at, are not:
https://www.ohloh.net/p/apache-click/analyses/latest
Andrei.
Re: Ohloh data about click not quite actual.
Posted by Bob Schellink <sa...@gmail.com>.
Looks up to date to me:
https://www.ohloh.net/p/apache-click/commits
On 26/07/2010 17:45, Andrei Ionescu wrote:
>>> Lot's of users when compare Click to other projects, point out as a
>>> "disadvantage" of Click the data from Ohloh.net.
>>> I haven't used that before, and I'm not sure why it's the "authority" in
>>> the open source scene, but those statistics there for Click look quite
>>> outdated (e.g. last commit is from January) and make Click look less
>>> valuable than it is.
>> It looks like even as non-manager of the project there, I was allowed to
>> change important data of the project (including the new SVN url to fetch
>> the actual commits)
> It looks like the stats about commits are still the old (last checkin
> in January 2010).
> This might be due to the fact that Bob changed the SVN URL from:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/click/trunk/
> to
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/click/trunk/click/
>
> during the "parsing" procedure that took several hours.
> (it's mentioned in their docs that if URLs are changed during
> processing, their script will intercept, and fallback or do something
> else unexpected)
>
> regards,
> Andrei.
>
>
Re: Ohloh data about click not quite actual.
Posted by Andrei Ionescu <ai...@yahoo.com>.
>> Lot's of users when compare Click to other projects, point out as a
>> "disadvantage" of Click the data from Ohloh.net.
>> I haven't used that before, and I'm not sure why it's the "authority" in
>> the open source scene, but those statistics there for Click look quite
>> outdated (e.g. last commit is from January) and make Click look less
>> valuable than it is.
> It looks like even as non-manager of the project there, I was allowed to
> change important data of the project (including the new SVN url to fetch
> the actual commits)
It looks like the stats about commits are still the old (last checkin
in January 2010).
This might be due to the fact that Bob changed the SVN URL from:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/click/trunk/
to
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/click/trunk/click/
during the "parsing" procedure that took several hours.
(it's mentioned in their docs that if URLs are changed during
processing, their script will intercept, and fallback or do something
else unexpected)
regards,
Andrei.
Re: Ohloh data about click not quite actual.
Posted by Andrei Ionescu <ai...@yahoo.com>.
> Lot's of users when compare Click to other projects, point out as a
> "disadvantage" of Click the data from Ohloh.net.
> I haven't used that before, and I'm not sure why it's the "authority" in
> the open source scene, but those statistics there for Click look quite
> outdated (e.g. last commit is from January) and make Click look less
> valuable than it is.
It looks like even as non-manager of the project there, I was allowed to
change important data of the project (including the new SVN url to fetch
the actual commits)
regards,
Andrei.