You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@daffodil.apache.org by "Steve Lawrence (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/09/11 13:25:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (DAFFODIL-1954) Java version greater than 1.8 cause failure

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Steve Lawrence reassigned DAFFODIL-1954:
----------------------------------------

    Assignee: Steve Lawrence

> Java version greater than 1.8 cause failure
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAFFODIL-1954
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1954
>             Project: Daffodil
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Back End
>            Reporter: Steve Lawrence
>            Assignee: Steve Lawrence
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: beginner
>             Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>
> If you try to use Daffodil with Java 10, you get a failure with the exception:
> {code}
> java.lang.NumberFormatException: Not a version: 10
> 	at scala.util.PropertiesTrait$class.parts$1(Properties.scala:184)
> 	at scala.util.PropertiesTrait$class.isJavaAtLeast(Properties.scala:188)
> 	at scala.util.Properties$.isJavaAtLeast(Properties.scala:17)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.util.CheckJavaVersion$.checkJavaVersion(CheckJavaVersion.scala:29)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.compiler.ProcessorFactory$$anonfun$onPath$1.apply(Compiler.scala:166)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.compiler.ProcessorFactory$$anonfun$onPath$1.apply(Compiler.scala:149)
> 	at scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:58)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.ExecutionMode$$anonfun$usingCompilerMode$1.apply(ExecutionMode.scala:64)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.ExecutionMode$$anonfun$usingCompilerMode$1.apply(ExecutionMode.scala:64)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.compiler.ProcessorFactory.onPath(Compiler.scala:149)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.Main$$anonfun$71.apply(Main.scala:714)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.Main$$anonfun$71.apply(Main.scala:711)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.util.Timer$.getTimeResult(Timer.scala:76)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.util.Timer$.getResult(Timer.scala:35)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.Main$.createProcessorFromSchema(Main.scala:711)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.Main$.run(Main.scala:824)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.Main$.main(Main.scala:1297)
> 	at org.apache.daffodil.Main.main(Main.scala)
> {code}
> It looks like Java changed their version schema to not use a dot (e.g. 10 vs 1.10) and Scala 2.11's checker could handle that, so a NumberFormatException is thrown.
> It looks like scala 2.12 has better checking for this (see DAFFODIL-1652), but we should also catch a NumberFormatException here and treat that as if it is not a valid Java version.
> This was reported on Java 10, but I suspect the same issues happens for Java 9. Also, we should run our tests on Java 9/10 to ensure tests still pass with a newer Java.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)