Re: Test structure

[Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>]

Don't forget to copy both lists. Remember we are working to move our 
traffic across
to the apache lists.

Carl.


Alan Conway wrote:
> I'm going to start building a "broker compliance" python test suite
> (unless Steve gives me ruby bindings :)
>
> I've put a simple unittest framework in place and converted the 3
> existing python tests. I've also added some cleanup functionality so
> queues and exchanges created during a test get deleted at the end. It'll
> all probably need some tuning going forward but it's a start.
>
> My next step is to build tests covering the functionality I want to
> build in C++ which is the exchange types. The  <rule> elements in
> amqp.xml seem like a good source of initial tests, and I expect I'll
> need to augment with tests for stuff not covered by a <rule>  
>
> So I propose this structure: 
>
> 1) for each spec class (e.g. exchange) we create module
> python/tests/exchange.py containing test class TestExchangeRules. That
> class contains test methods for each rule. I'd rather use the rule name
> attributes from the latest spec trunk than the previous test names, 
> e.g. queue.QueueRuleTests.test_minimum_queues
> not  queue.QueueRuleTests.test_amq_queue_35.
>
> 2) where we need additional tests we add further ad-hoc test classes ,
> e.g. for topic exchange tests, we might add exchange.TestTopicExchange
> etc. 
>
> I've some vague ideas about automating checks for correspondence between
> amqp.xml and the python test classes but we'll see how ambitious I get.
>
> Any suggestions for improvements most appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@etp.108.redhat.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@etp.108.redhat.com
>
>