Re: [POLL] Defining a stack of components for the next release of Bigtop

[Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>]

Seems reasonable, except that I have no idea what Hama is and why we need to
add it to the stack.

Cos

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:55PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a poll of opinion for a future vote on what should be a Bill
> Of Materials for
> the next version of Bigtop distribution. I will call a formal vote in
> a week. Please
> note, since we're targeting a few future releases here, the backup plan for
> any such component is to remain at the version it is currently at in
> Bigtop 0.2.0:
> 
> Version updates [with probabilities for unreleased versions]
>    * Zookeeper 3.4 [very high]
>    * Hadoop (0.20.205.1 AKA 0.20.206.0 AKA 1.0 ;-)) [very high]
>    * HBase 0.92 [very high]
>    * Oozie 2.3.3 [unknown] (tucu, any idea on what's going on with 2.3 branch?)
>    * Whirr 0.6.0 (unless there's any reason not to)
>    * Mahout 0.6 [unknown]
>    * Flume 0.9.4 (subject to Thrift packaging, see bellow)
> 
> New components
>    * HCatalog 0.2.0
>    * Thrift 0.7.0
>    * Avro 1.6.1 (unless there's a reason to stick with a different version)
>    * Hama  0.3.0  (unless there's a reason to stick with a different version)
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman.