You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pulsar.apache.org by Andras Beni <an...@streamnative.io.INVALID> on 2022/05/02 06:49:42 UTC
[VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Hi Pulsar Community,
I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow more
topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
and the discussion thead is available at
https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k.
Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
Thanks,
Andras
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by Matteo Merli <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 3:04 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Andras,
> even if our rules allow to close a vote with a binding -1, we should
> have to reach consensus and understand better Lari's motivations
>
> we are a community and accepting something with a -1 must be handled carefully
>
> I suggest to try to continue the discussion and try to converge
The place for reaching consensus is the [DISCUSSION] thread, and the
discussion thread was out for many days before the vote was started,
without any negative feedback.
When questions were asked on this voting thread, the clarifications were posted.
No one person has a "veto" power, and I don't think that Lari was
asking for that either.
This is a concrete proposal that removes a current limitation in the
system, in a way that does not impact existing users and provides a
simple mechanism for bucketing that can later be expanded to address
more complex scenarios (like migrations, enable/disable,
splitting/merging).
I've read through the points raised by Lari on the other thread and I
will reply on the ideas for MetadataStore API there, but I don't think
the concerns are related to this PIP-157 proposal and I don't see in
there a different suggestion on how to solve the problem raised by
PIP-157.
This PIP-157 is not about limitations of MetadataStore API, rather is
addressing limitations that are in the backend implementations (eg:
ZooKeeper) where the number of z-nodes in a single directory has to be
limited by the frame-size, or the getChildren() operation will fail.
Yes, there are matters that could be improved in the MetadataStore API
or implementation but I don't see how these can be tied with the fact
that we need to split the children in a directory.
Because of that, I don't think we should turn upside-down the PIP
process, which here was followed to the letter and to the spirit, and
we should still consider this PIP-157 as approved.
As I mentioned in an earlier thread, it's important to stick by the
decisions taken (unless new elements arise that were not initially
considered), or otherwise this PIP process would be just a pointless
exercise.
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
<ma...@gmail.com>
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Andras,
even if our rules allow to close a vote with a binding -1, we should
have to reach consensus and understand better Lari's motivations
we are a community and accepting something with a -1 must be handled carefully
I suggest to try to continue the discussion and try to converge
Enrico
Il giorno ven 20 mag 2022 alle ore 11:49 Andras Beni
<an...@streamnative.io.invalid> ha scritto:
>
> Thanks for your participation.
> I'm closing the vote.
> The proposal has been accepted with 4 binding +1, 1 binding -1 and 2
> non-binding +1 votes.
>
> Best regards,
> Andras
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 11:11 AM Lari Hotari <lh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > -1
> >
> > Hi Andras & Matteo, I'm sorry for the delay in my feedback.
> >
> > I voted -1 since I think that it would be more valuable to first analyze
> > the existing problems before adding more intermediate solutions such as
> > PIP-157. I'm fine if you want to go ahead and implement PIP-157 so I don't
> > see the proposal a problem itself.
> >
> > I have written a long write-up in a new thread "Pulsar 3.0 brainstorming:
> > Going beyond PIP-45 Pluggable metadata interface",
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/tvco1orf0hsyt59pjtfbwoq0vf6hfrcj . The
> > last part of the long email handles PIP-157 and hopefully clarifies why I
> > voted -1. We can continue discussion in the context of that thread.
> >
> > -Lari
> >
> > On 2022/05/02 16:40:54 Matteo Merli wrote:
> > > Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there
> > > were 2 positive feedbacks.
> > > I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would
> > > have been better if the discussion happened then.
> > >
> > > As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a
> > > couple of misconceptions on the proposal itself, as they are not
> > > actual problems (eg: managed ledger is not affected at all by this
> > > proposal, as the naming happens on top of it).
> > >
> > > Some parts can be clarified (as it is always the case), though I don't
> > > think it's a good idea to stop a vote at this point.
> > >
> > >
> > > Matteo
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matteo Merli
> > > <ma...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 3:31 AM Lari Hotari <La...@hotari.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions.
> > > >
> > > > -Lari
> > > >
> > > > ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <andras.beni@streamnative.io
> > .invalid>
> > > > kirjoitti:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Pulsar Community,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow
> > more
> > > > > topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
> > > > >
> > > > > The proposal can be read at
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
> > > > > and the discussion thead is available at
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k.
> > > > >
> > > > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Andras
> > > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by Andras Beni <an...@streamnative.io.INVALID>.
Thanks for your participation.
I'm closing the vote.
The proposal has been accepted with 4 binding +1, 1 binding -1 and 2
non-binding +1 votes.
Best regards,
Andras
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 11:11 AM Lari Hotari <lh...@apache.org> wrote:
> -1
>
> Hi Andras & Matteo, I'm sorry for the delay in my feedback.
>
> I voted -1 since I think that it would be more valuable to first analyze
> the existing problems before adding more intermediate solutions such as
> PIP-157. I'm fine if you want to go ahead and implement PIP-157 so I don't
> see the proposal a problem itself.
>
> I have written a long write-up in a new thread "Pulsar 3.0 brainstorming:
> Going beyond PIP-45 Pluggable metadata interface",
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tvco1orf0hsyt59pjtfbwoq0vf6hfrcj . The
> last part of the long email handles PIP-157 and hopefully clarifies why I
> voted -1. We can continue discussion in the context of that thread.
>
> -Lari
>
> On 2022/05/02 16:40:54 Matteo Merli wrote:
> > Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there
> > were 2 positive feedbacks.
> > I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would
> > have been better if the discussion happened then.
> >
> > As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a
> > couple of misconceptions on the proposal itself, as they are not
> > actual problems (eg: managed ledger is not affected at all by this
> > proposal, as the naming happens on top of it).
> >
> > Some parts can be clarified (as it is always the case), though I don't
> > think it's a good idea to stop a vote at this point.
> >
> >
> > Matteo
> >
> > --
> > Matteo Merli
> > <ma...@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 3:31 AM Lari Hotari <La...@hotari.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > -1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions.
> > >
> > > -Lari
> > >
> > > ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <andras.beni@streamnative.io
> .invalid>
> > > kirjoitti:
> > >
> > > > Hi Pulsar Community,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow
> more
> > > > topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
> > > >
> > > > The proposal can be read at
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
> > > > and the discussion thead is available at
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k.
> > > >
> > > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andras
> > > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by Lari Hotari <lh...@apache.org>.
-1
Hi Andras & Matteo, I'm sorry for the delay in my feedback.
I voted -1 since I think that it would be more valuable to first analyze the existing problems before adding more intermediate solutions such as PIP-157. I'm fine if you want to go ahead and implement PIP-157 so I don't see the proposal a problem itself.
I have written a long write-up in a new thread "Pulsar 3.0 brainstorming: Going beyond PIP-45 Pluggable metadata interface", https://lists.apache.org/thread/tvco1orf0hsyt59pjtfbwoq0vf6hfrcj . The last part of the long email handles PIP-157 and hopefully clarifies why I voted -1. We can continue discussion in the context of that thread.
-Lari
On 2022/05/02 16:40:54 Matteo Merli wrote:
> Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there
> were 2 positive feedbacks.
> I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would
> have been better if the discussion happened then.
>
> As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a
> couple of misconceptions on the proposal itself, as they are not
> actual problems (eg: managed ledger is not affected at all by this
> proposal, as the naming happens on top of it).
>
> Some parts can be clarified (as it is always the case), though I don't
> think it's a good idea to stop a vote at this point.
>
>
> Matteo
>
> --
> Matteo Merli
> <ma...@gmail.com>
>
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 3:31 AM Lari Hotari <La...@hotari.net> wrote:
> >
> > -1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions.
> >
> > -Lari
> >
> > ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <an...@streamnative.io.invalid>
> > kirjoitti:
> >
> > > Hi Pulsar Community,
> > >
> > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow more
> > > topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
> > >
> > > The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
> > > and the discussion thead is available at
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k.
> > >
> > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Andras
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by Hang Chen <ch...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Hang
mattison chao <ma...@gmail.com> 于2022年5月18日周三 16:44写道：
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Mattison
>
> On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 15:20, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno mer 18 mag 2022 alle ore 08:54 Matteo Merli
> > <ma...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matteo Merli
> > > <ma...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:40 PM Matteo Merli <ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there
> > > > were 2 positive feedbacks.
> > > > I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would
> > > > have been better if the discussion happened then.
> > > >
> > > > As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a
> > > > couple of misconceptions on the proposal itself, as they are not
> > > > actual problems (eg: managed ledger is not affected at all by this
> > > > proposal, as the naming happens on top of it).
> > > >
> > > > Some parts can be clarified (as it is always the case), though I don't
> > > > think it's a good idea to stop a vote at this point.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Matteo
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matteo Merli
> > > > <ma...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 3:31 AM Lari Hotari <La...@hotari.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > -1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Lari
> > > > >
> > > > > ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <andras.beni@streamnative.io
> > .invalid>
> > > > > kirjoitti:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Pulsar Community,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow
> > more
> > > > > > topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The proposal can be read at
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
> > > > > > and the discussion thead is available at
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Andras
> > > > > >
> >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by Lan Liang <li...@163.com>.
+1 NB
Best Regards,
Lan Liang
On 5/19/2022 17:30，PengHui Li<pe...@apache.org> wrote：
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Penghui
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 4:44 PM mattison chao <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Mattison
On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 15:20, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 (binding)
Enrico
Il giorno mer 18 mag 2022 alle ore 08:54 Matteo Merli
<ma...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
+1
--
Matteo Merli
<ma...@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:40 PM Matteo Merli <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there
were 2 positive feedbacks.
I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would
have been better if the discussion happened then.
As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a
couple of misconceptions on the proposal itself, as they are not
actual problems (eg: managed ledger is not affected at all by this
proposal, as the naming happens on top of it).
Some parts can be clarified (as it is always the case), though I
don't
think it's a good idea to stop a vote at this point.
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
<ma...@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 3:31 AM Lari Hotari <La...@hotari.net> wrote:
-1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions.
-Lari
ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <
andras.beni@streamnative.io
.invalid>
kirjoitti:
Hi Pulsar Community,
I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to
allow
more
topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
The proposal can be read at
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
and the discussion thead is available at
https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k
.
Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
Thanks,
Andras
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Penghui
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 4:44 PM mattison chao <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Mattison
>
> On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 15:20, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno mer 18 mag 2022 alle ore 08:54 Matteo Merli
> > <ma...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matteo Merli
> > > <ma...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:40 PM Matteo Merli <ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there
> > > > were 2 positive feedbacks.
> > > > I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would
> > > > have been better if the discussion happened then.
> > > >
> > > > As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a
> > > > couple of misconceptions on the proposal itself, as they are not
> > > > actual problems (eg: managed ledger is not affected at all by this
> > > > proposal, as the naming happens on top of it).
> > > >
> > > > Some parts can be clarified (as it is always the case), though I
> don't
> > > > think it's a good idea to stop a vote at this point.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Matteo
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matteo Merli
> > > > <ma...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 3:31 AM Lari Hotari <La...@hotari.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > -1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Lari
> > > > >
> > > > > ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <
> andras.beni@streamnative.io
> > .invalid>
> > > > > kirjoitti:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Pulsar Community,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to
> allow
> > more
> > > > > > topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The proposal can be read at
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
> > > > > > and the discussion thead is available at
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k
> .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Andras
> > > > > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by mattison chao <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Mattison
On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 15:20, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno mer 18 mag 2022 alle ore 08:54 Matteo Merli
> <ma...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > Matteo Merli
> > <ma...@gmail.com>
> >
> > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:40 PM Matteo Merli <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there
> > > were 2 positive feedbacks.
> > > I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would
> > > have been better if the discussion happened then.
> > >
> > > As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a
> > > couple of misconceptions on the proposal itself, as they are not
> > > actual problems (eg: managed ledger is not affected at all by this
> > > proposal, as the naming happens on top of it).
> > >
> > > Some parts can be clarified (as it is always the case), though I don't
> > > think it's a good idea to stop a vote at this point.
> > >
> > >
> > > Matteo
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matteo Merli
> > > <ma...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 3:31 AM Lari Hotari <La...@hotari.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions.
> > > >
> > > > -Lari
> > > >
> > > > ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <andras.beni@streamnative.io
> .invalid>
> > > > kirjoitti:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Pulsar Community,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow
> more
> > > > > topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
> > > > >
> > > > > The proposal can be read at
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
> > > > > and the discussion thead is available at
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k.
> > > > >
> > > > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Andras
> > > > >
>
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Enrico
Il giorno mer 18 mag 2022 alle ore 08:54 Matteo Merli
<ma...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> +1
>
> --
> Matteo Merli
> <ma...@gmail.com>
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:40 PM Matteo Merli <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there
> > were 2 positive feedbacks.
> > I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would
> > have been better if the discussion happened then.
> >
> > As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a
> > couple of misconceptions on the proposal itself, as they are not
> > actual problems (eg: managed ledger is not affected at all by this
> > proposal, as the naming happens on top of it).
> >
> > Some parts can be clarified (as it is always the case), though I don't
> > think it's a good idea to stop a vote at this point.
> >
> >
> > Matteo
> >
> > --
> > Matteo Merli
> > <ma...@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 3:31 AM Lari Hotari <La...@hotari.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > -1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions.
> > >
> > > -Lari
> > >
> > > ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <an...@streamnative.io.invalid>
> > > kirjoitti:
> > >
> > > > Hi Pulsar Community,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow more
> > > > topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
> > > >
> > > > The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
> > > > and the discussion thead is available at
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k.
> > > >
> > > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andras
> > > >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by Matteo Merli <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1
--
Matteo Merli
<ma...@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:40 PM Matteo Merli <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there
> were 2 positive feedbacks.
> I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would
> have been better if the discussion happened then.
>
> As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a
> couple of misconceptions on the proposal itself, as they are not
> actual problems (eg: managed ledger is not affected at all by this
> proposal, as the naming happens on top of it).
>
> Some parts can be clarified (as it is always the case), though I don't
> think it's a good idea to stop a vote at this point.
>
>
> Matteo
>
> --
> Matteo Merli
> <ma...@gmail.com>
>
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 3:31 AM Lari Hotari <La...@hotari.net> wrote:
> >
> > -1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions.
> >
> > -Lari
> >
> > ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <an...@streamnative.io.invalid>
> > kirjoitti:
> >
> > > Hi Pulsar Community,
> > >
> > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow more
> > > topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
> > >
> > > The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
> > > and the discussion thead is available at
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k.
> > >
> > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Andras
> > >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by Matteo Merli <ma...@gmail.com>.
Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there
were 2 positive feedbacks.
I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would
have been better if the discussion happened then.
As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a
couple of misconceptions on the proposal itself, as they are not
actual problems (eg: managed ledger is not affected at all by this
proposal, as the naming happens on top of it).
Some parts can be clarified (as it is always the case), though I don't
think it's a good idea to stop a vote at this point.
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
<ma...@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 3:31 AM Lari Hotari <La...@hotari.net> wrote:
>
> -1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions.
>
> -Lari
>
> ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <an...@streamnative.io.invalid>
> kirjoitti:
>
> > Hi Pulsar Community,
> >
> > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow more
> > topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
> >
> > The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
> > and the discussion thead is available at
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k.
> >
> > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andras
> >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by Lari Hotari <La...@hotari.net>.
-1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions.
-Lari
ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <an...@streamnative.io.invalid>
kirjoitti:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow more
> topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
>
> The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
> and the discussion thead is available at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k.
>
> Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
>
> Thanks,
> Andras
>
Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
I left some questions.
I am not sure we are ready to run a VOTE, this change will have a huge
impact on Pulsar
Enrico
Il Lun 2 Mag 2022, 08:50 Andras Beni <an...@streamnative.io.invalid>
ha scritto:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow more
> topics per namespace" (PIP-157).
>
> The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254
> and the discussion thead is available at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k.
>
> Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
>
> Thanks,
> Andras
>