You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Kurt Greaves (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/11/09 10:08:58 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-10979) LCS doesn't do L0 STC on new
tables while an L0->L1 compaction is in progress
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Kurt Greaves updated CASSANDRA-10979:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.14)
> LCS doesn't do L0 STC on new tables while an L0->L1 compaction is in progress
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-10979
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10979
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Compaction
> Environment: 2.1.11 / 4.8.3 DSE.
> Reporter: Jeff Ferland
> Assignee: Carl Yeksigian
> Labels: compaction, lcs, leveled
> Fix For: 2.2.5, 3.0.3, 3.3
>
> Attachments: 10979-2.1.txt
>
>
> Reading code from https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-2.1/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/db/compaction/LeveledManifest.java and comparing with behavior shown in https://gist.github.com/autocracy/c95aca6b00e42215daaf, the following happens:
> Score for L1,L2,and L3 is all < 1 (paste shows 20/10 and 200/100, due to incremental repair).
> Relevant code from here is
> if (Sets.intersection(l1overlapping, compacting).size() > 0)
> return Collections.emptyList();
> Since there will be overlap between what is compacting and L1 (in my case, pushing over 1,000 tables in to L1 from L0 SCTS), I get a pile up of 1,000 smaller tables in L0 while awaiting the transition from L0 to L1 and destroy my performance.
> Requested outcome is to continue to perform SCTS on non-compacting L0 tables.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)