You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@flume.apache.org by Proust/Feng Guizhou <Proust>,
,
FDS,
,
<pf...@coupang.com> on 2017/03/01 17:09:25 UTC
[HBase] HBase Sink VS ASync HBase Sink
Hi, All
From below wiki, it looks like throughput of ASync HBase Sink is much
lower than HBase Sink,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUME/Performance+Measurements+-+round+2
This result looks pretty strange(how async lower/slow than sync operation),
so is there any one have experience to confirm the wiki's result? I'm
currently using Async one, should I switch to HBase Sink for higher
throughput?
Thanks a lot
Proust
--
地址: 上海市浦东新区金科路2889弄长泰广场C座7楼
Address: 7th floor, No#3, Jinke road 2889, Pudong district, Shanghai, China.
Mobile: +86 13621672634
Re: [HBase] HBase Sink VS ASync HBase Sink
Posted by Proust/Feng Guizhou <Proust>,
,
FDS,
,
<pf...@coupang.com>.
One more thing to add, AsyncHBase provided a performance compare result in
their wiki, see
https://github.com/OpenTSDB/asynchbase/wiki
Looks like it should be much better than HTable operations
On 2 March 2017 at 01:09, Proust(Proust/Feng Guizhou) [FDS Payment] <
pfeng@coupang.com> wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> From below wiki, it looks like throughput of ASync HBase Sink is much
> lower than HBase Sink,
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUME/
> Performance+Measurements+-+round+2
>
> This result looks pretty strange(how async lower/slow than sync
> operation), so is there any one have experience to confirm the wiki's
> result? I'm currently using Async one, should I switch to HBase Sink for
> higher throughput?
>
> Thanks a lot
> Proust
>
>
>