You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openmeetings.apache.org by Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net> on 2013/07/20 09:12:59 UTC
Questions about Openmeetings
Hi Experts,
I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out?
1. How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 �C 20 person are supported, it is true?
2. Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the conference? I know it��s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference.
3. Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the OM?
4. HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner��s mail for 3.0 proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5.
Thanks
Jinjun
答复: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
Posted by Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>.
In our case, we want to make more students in one room, only one presenter or two share their slides and video. Based on my estimation, we need about 400+ students. With one server, I am afraid it cannot support so much load.
For the second question, it is related with the first question, we want to separate the voice mixing from OM, which will decrease the server load.
It’s great to get the news 3.1.1 will be released in this year.
Jinjun
发件人: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com]
发送时间: Sunday, July 21, 2013 7:34 AM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list
抄送: pccom.frank@gmail.com
主题: Re: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
1) I'm afraid the bottleneck is bandwidth + client PC computing power. I believe more people can attend the meeting in case not all of them will share their video (like 2-3 presenters and the rest is auditory.) In our tests we were using 20 people simultaniously broadcasting their video
2) We are using red5 as streeming server and all audio/vidoe streams are are awent through the server.
3) Unfortunatelly we have no roadmap with dates for 3.1. I hope we will be able to release it before the end of the year.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>> wrote:
Thanks for reply.
1) With the cluster, can we support more person in one room?
2) FS means freeswitch.
3) I know 3.0 will be released in 3 months, how about 3.1 ?
Thanks
Jinjun
发件人: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>]
发送时间: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list; pccom.frank@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>
主题: Re: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested that
2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS
4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0 room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without flash (I really hope so)
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Unsubscribe
Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®.
________________________________
From: Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org<ma...@openmeetings.apache.org>>
ReplyTo: user@openmeetings.apache.org<ma...@openmeetings.apache.org>
Subject: Questions about Openmeetings
Hi Experts,
I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out?
1. How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it is true?
2. Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the conference? I know it’s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference.
3. Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the OM?
4. HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail for 3.0 proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5.
Thanks
Jinjun
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
答复: 答复: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
Posted by Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>.
Thanks Maxim.
Jinjun
发件人: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com]
发送时间: Sunday, July 21, 2013 2:07 PM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list
抄送: pccom.frank@gmail.com
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
Current cluster architecture was designed to be able to host OM room on separate server.
So cluster can help you to have several large rooms, but not to allow several servers to serve 1 room.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>> wrote:
BTW,
Can OM server cluster help to increase the meeting rooms load, such as support more persons?
Jinjun
发件人: Feng Jinjun 冯金军
发送时间: Sunday, July 21, 2013 8:04 AM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list
抄送: pccom.frank@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>
主题: 答复: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
In our case, we want to make more students in one room, only one presenter or two share their slides and video. Based on my estimation, we need about 400+ students. With one server, I am afraid it cannot support so much load.
For the second question, it is related with the first question, we want to separate the voice mixing from OM, which will decrease the server load.
It’s great to get the news 3.1.1 will be released in this year.
Jinjun
发件人: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com]
发送时间: Sunday, July 21, 2013 7:34 AM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list
抄送: pccom.frank@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>
主题: Re: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
1) I'm afraid the bottleneck is bandwidth + client PC computing power. I believe more people can attend the meeting in case not all of them will share their video (like 2-3 presenters and the rest is auditory.) In our tests we were using 20 people simultaniously broadcasting their video
2) We are using red5 as streeming server and all audio/vidoe streams are are awent through the server.
3) Unfortunatelly we have no roadmap with dates for 3.1. I hope we will be able to release it before the end of the year.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>> wrote:
Thanks for reply.
1) With the cluster, can we support more person in one room?
2) FS means freeswitch.
3) I know 3.0 will be released in 3 months, how about 3.1 ?
Thanks
Jinjun
发件人: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>]
发送时间: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list; pccom.frank@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>
主题: Re: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested that
2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS
4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0 room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without flash (I really hope so)
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Unsubscribe
Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®.
________________________________
From: Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org<ma...@openmeetings.apache.org>>
ReplyTo: user@openmeetings.apache.org<ma...@openmeetings.apache.org>
Subject: Questions about Openmeetings
Hi Experts,
I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out?
1. How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it is true?
2. Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the conference? I know it’s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference.
3. Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the OM?
4. HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail for 3.0 proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5.
Thanks
Jinjun
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: 答复: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Current cluster architecture was designed to be able to host OM room on
separate server.
So cluster can help you to have several large rooms, but not to allow
several servers to serve 1 room.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Feng Jinjun 冯金军
<ji...@polylink.net>wrote:
> BTW, ****
>
> ** **
>
> Can OM server cluster help to increase the meeting rooms load, such as
> support more persons? ****
>
> ** **
>
> Jinjun****
>
> ** **
>
> *发件人**:* Feng Jinjun 冯金军
> *发送时间:* Sunday, July 21, 2013 8:04 AM
>
> *收件人:* Openmeetings user-list
> *抄送:* pccom.frank@gmail.com
> *主题:* 答复: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings****
>
> ** **
>
> In our case, we want to make more students in one room, only one presenter
> or two share their slides and video. Based on my estimation, we need about
> 400+ students. With one server, I am afraid it cannot support so much load.
> ****
>
> For the second question, it is related with the first question, we want to
> separate the voice mixing from OM, which will decrease the server load. **
> **
>
> ** **
>
> It’s great to get the news 3.1.1 will be released in this year. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Jinjun****
>
> ** **
>
> *发件人**:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com<so...@gmail.com>]
>
> *发送时间:* Sunday, July 21, 2013 7:34 AM
> *收件人:* Openmeetings user-list
> *抄送:* pccom.frank@gmail.com
> *主题:* Re: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings****
>
> ** **
>
> 1) I'm afraid the bottleneck is bandwidth + client PC computing power. I
> believe more people can attend the meeting in case not all of them will
> share their video (like 2-3 presenters and the rest is auditory.) In our
> tests we were using 20 people simultaniously broadcasting their video****
>
> ** **
>
> 2) We are using red5 as streeming server and all audio/vidoe streams are
> are awent through the server.****
>
> ** **
>
> 3) Unfortunatelly we have no roadmap with dates for 3.1. I hope we will be
> able to release it before the end of the year.****
>
> ** **
>
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>
> wrote:****
>
> Thanks for reply. ****
>
> ****
>
> 1) With the cluster, can we support more person in one room? ****
>
> 2) FS means freeswitch. ****
>
> 3) I know 3.0 will be released in 3 months, how about 3.1 ? ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> Thanks ****
>
> Jinjun****
>
> ****
>
> *发件人**:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com]
> *发送时间:* Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM
> *收件人:* Openmeetings user-list; pccom.frank@gmail.com
> *主题:* Re: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings****
>
> ****
>
> 1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested
> that****
>
> 2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS****
>
> 4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0
> room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without
> flash (I really hope so)****
>
> ****
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pc...@gmail.com> wrote:****
>
> Unsubscribe****
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®.****
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net> ****
>
> *Date: *Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000****
>
> *To: *user@openmeetings.apache.org<us...@openmeetings.apache.org>****
>
> *ReplyTo: *user@openmeetings.apache.org ****
>
> *Subject: *Questions about Openmeetings****
>
> ****
>
> Hi Experts,****
>
> ****
>
> I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out? *
> ***
>
> ****
>
> 1. How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have
> ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it is
> true? ****
>
> 2. Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the
> conference? I know it’s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will
> bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference. ****
>
> 3. Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the
> OM? ****
>
> 4. HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found
> only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail for 3.0
> proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5. ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> Thanks ****
>
> Jinjun****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax ****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax ****
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
答复: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
Posted by Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>.
BTW,
Can OM server cluster help to increase the meeting rooms load, such as support more persons?
Jinjun
发件人: Feng Jinjun 冯金军
发送时间: Sunday, July 21, 2013 8:04 AM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list
抄送: pccom.frank@gmail.com
主题: 答复: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
In our case, we want to make more students in one room, only one presenter or two share their slides and video. Based on my estimation, we need about 400+ students. With one server, I am afraid it cannot support so much load.
For the second question, it is related with the first question, we want to separate the voice mixing from OM, which will decrease the server load.
It’s great to get the news 3.1.1 will be released in this year.
Jinjun
发件人: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com]
发送时间: Sunday, July 21, 2013 7:34 AM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list
抄送: pccom.frank@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>
主题: Re: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
1) I'm afraid the bottleneck is bandwidth + client PC computing power. I believe more people can attend the meeting in case not all of them will share their video (like 2-3 presenters and the rest is auditory.) In our tests we were using 20 people simultaniously broadcasting their video
2) We are using red5 as streeming server and all audio/vidoe streams are are awent through the server.
3) Unfortunatelly we have no roadmap with dates for 3.1. I hope we will be able to release it before the end of the year.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>> wrote:
Thanks for reply.
1) With the cluster, can we support more person in one room?
2) FS means freeswitch.
3) I know 3.0 will be released in 3 months, how about 3.1 ?
Thanks
Jinjun
发件人: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>]
发送时间: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list; pccom.frank@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>
主题: Re: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested that
2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS
4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0 room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without flash (I really hope so)
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Unsubscribe
Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®.
________________________________
From: Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org<ma...@openmeetings.apache.org>>
ReplyTo: user@openmeetings.apache.org<ma...@openmeetings.apache.org>
Subject: Questions about Openmeetings
Hi Experts,
I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out?
1. How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it is true?
2. Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the conference? I know it’s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference.
3. Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the OM?
4. HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail for 3.0 proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5.
Thanks
Jinjun
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: 答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
1) I'm afraid the bottleneck is bandwidth + client PC computing power. I
believe more people can attend the meeting in case not all of them will
share their video (like 2-3 presenters and the rest is auditory.) In our
tests we were using 20 people simultaniously broadcasting their video
2) We are using red5 as streeming server and all audio/vidoe streams are
are awent through the server.
3) Unfortunatelly we have no roadmap with dates for 3.1. I hope we will be
able to release it before the end of the year.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Feng Jinjun 冯金军
<ji...@polylink.net>wrote:
> Thanks for reply. ****
>
> ** **
>
> **1) **With the cluster, can we support more person in one room? ****
>
> **2) **FS means freeswitch. ****
>
> **3) **I know 3.0 will be released in 3 months, how about 3.1 ? ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks ****
>
> Jinjun****
>
> ** **
>
> *发件人**:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com]
> *发送时间:* Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM
> *收件人:* Openmeetings user-list; pccom.frank@gmail.com
> *主题:* Re: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings****
>
> ** **
>
> 1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested
> that****
>
> 2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS****
>
> 4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0
> room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without
> flash (I really hope so)****
>
> ** **
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pc...@gmail.com> wrote:****
>
> Unsubscribe****
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®.****
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net> ****
>
> *Date: *Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000****
>
> *To: *user@openmeetings.apache.org<us...@openmeetings.apache.org>****
>
> *ReplyTo: *user@openmeetings.apache.org ****
>
> *Subject: *Questions about Openmeetings****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Experts,****
>
> ****
>
> I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out? *
> ***
>
> ****
>
> 1. How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have
> ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it is
> true? ****
>
> 2. Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the
> conference? I know it’s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will
> bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference. ****
>
> 3. Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the
> OM? ****
>
> 4. HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found
> only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail for 3.0
> proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5. ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> Thanks ****
>
> Jinjun****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax ****
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
答复: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
Posted by Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>.
Thanks for reply.
1) With the cluster, can we support more person in one room?
2) FS means freeswitch.
3) I know 3.0 will be released in 3 months, how about 3.1 ?
Thanks
Jinjun
发件人: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com]
发送时间: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list; pccom.frank@gmail.com
主题: Re: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested that
2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS
4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0 room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without flash (I really hope so)
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Unsubscribe
Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®.
________________________________
From: Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org<ma...@openmeetings.apache.org>>
ReplyTo: user@openmeetings.apache.org<ma...@openmeetings.apache.org>
Subject: Questions about Openmeetings
Hi Experts,
I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out?
1. How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it is true?
2. Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the conference? I know it’s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference.
3. Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the OM?
4. HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail for 3.0 proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5.
Thanks
Jinjun
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: 答复： Questions about Openmeetings
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested
that
2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS
4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0
room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without
flash (I really hope so)
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unsubscribe
> Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®.
> ------------------------------
> *From: * Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>
> *Date: *Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000
> *To: *user@openmeetings.apache.org<us...@openmeetings.apache.org>
> *ReplyTo: * user@openmeetings.apache.org
> *Subject: *Questions about Openmeetings
>
> Hi Experts,****
>
> ** **
>
> I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out? *
> ***
>
> ****
>
> **1. **How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I
> have ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it
> is true? ****
>
> **2. **Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the
> conference? I know it’s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will
> bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference. ****
>
> **3. **Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and
> the OM? ****
>
> **4. **HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I
> found only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail
> for 3.0 proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5. ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks ****
>
> Jinjun****
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
RE: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
Posted by Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com>.
The server is connecting itself and server doesn't have any firewall
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 23:31:54 +0700
Subject: Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
From: solomax666@gmail.com
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
try something like telnet om_server_ip 1935
I'm afraid the ports can be closed by some firewall
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I've checked them with netstat -an commandBoth of them seems
TCP 0.0.0.0:1935 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:2383 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
TCP 0.0.0.0:3306 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
TCP 0.0.0.0:5080 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:8088 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:56:29 +0700
Subject: Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
From: solomax666@gmail.com
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
could you please check if OM ports are opened?1935 is primary RTMP port8088 is fallback RTMPT port
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi.
My Openmeetings installation is running perfectly for 1 month but for now i'm getting error message as you can see at screenshot below:
You can connect to site and see on live.
try 1, try 2 and try 3 message appears and this error dialog appears.
How can i solve this. Thanks.
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
RE: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
Posted by Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com>.
Thanks Maxim. I've tried everything that wrote here but nobody can solve problem. And then i've reinstalled software. You see my new installation.
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:11:11 +0700
Subject: Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
From: solomax666@gmail.com
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
I just accessed your server and everything seems to work (at least I can see the login window)What are the steps to get the error?
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
The server is connecting itself and there isn't any firewall.
I've tried "telnet localhost 1935" command. It's connecting without any error but blank screen appears.
I've tried "telnet localhost 8088" command. It's connecting without any error too. But blank screen appears too.
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 23:31:54 +0700
Subject: Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
From: solomax666@gmail.com
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
try something like telnet om_server_ip 1935
I'm afraid the ports can be closed by some firewall
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I've checked them with netstat -an commandBoth of them seems
TCP 0.0.0.0:1935 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:2383 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
TCP 0.0.0.0:3306 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
TCP 0.0.0.0:5080 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:8088 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:56:29 +0700
Subject: Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
From: solomax666@gmail.com
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
could you please check if OM ports are opened?1935 is primary RTMP port8088 is fallback RTMPT port
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi.
My Openmeetings installation is running perfectly for 1 month but for now i'm getting error message as you can see at screenshot below:
You can connect to site and see on live.
try 1, try 2 and try 3 message appears and this error dialog appears.
How can i solve this. Thanks.
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
I just accessed your server and everything seems to work (at least I can
see the login window)
What are the steps to get the error?
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The server is connecting itself and there isn't any firewall.
>
> I've tried "telnet localhost 1935" command. It's connecting without any
> error but blank screen appears.
> I've tried "telnet localhost 8088" command. It's connecting without any
> error too. But blank screen appears too.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 23:31:54 +0700
> Subject: Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
> From: solomax666@gmail.com
> To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
>
> try something like
> telnet om_server_ip 1935
>
> I'm afraid the ports can be closed by some firewall
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> I've checked them with netstat -an command
> Both of them seems
>
> TCP 0.0.0.0:1935 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
> TCP 0.0.0.0:2383 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
> TCP 0.0.0.0:3306 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
> TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
> TCP 0.0.0.0:5080 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
> TCP 0.0.0.0:8088 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:56:29 +0700
> Subject: Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
> From: solomax666@gmail.com
> To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
>
> could you please check if OM ports are opened?
> 1935 is primary RTMP port
> 8088 is fallback RTMPT port
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> My Openmeetings installation is running perfectly for 1 month but for now
> i'm getting error message as you can see at screenshot below:
>
>
>
>
>
> You can connect to site and see on live.
>
> try 1, try 2 and try 3 message appears and this error dialog appears.
>
> How can i solve this. Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
RE: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
Posted by Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com>.
The server is connecting itself and there isn't any firewall.
I've tried "telnet localhost 1935" command. It's connecting without any error but blank screen appears.I've tried "telnet localhost 8088" command. It's connecting without any error too. But blank screen appears too.
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 23:31:54 +0700
Subject: Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
From: solomax666@gmail.com
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
try something like telnet om_server_ip 1935
I'm afraid the ports can be closed by some firewall
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I've checked them with netstat -an commandBoth of them seems
TCP 0.0.0.0:1935 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:2383 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
TCP 0.0.0.0:3306 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
TCP 0.0.0.0:5080 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:8088 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:56:29 +0700
Subject: Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
From: solomax666@gmail.com
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
could you please check if OM ports are opened?1935 is primary RTMP port8088 is fallback RTMPT port
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi.
My Openmeetings installation is running perfectly for 1 month but for now i'm getting error message as you can see at screenshot below:
You can connect to site and see on live.
try 1, try 2 and try 3 message appears and this error dialog appears.
How can i solve this. Thanks.
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
try something like
telnet om_server_ip 1935
I'm afraid the ports can be closed by some firewall
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I've checked them with netstat -an command
> Both of them seems
>
> TCP 0.0.0.0:1935 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
> TCP 0.0.0.0:2383 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
> TCP 0.0.0.0:3306 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
> TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
> TCP 0.0.0.0:5080 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
> TCP 0.0.0.0:8088 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:56:29 +0700
> Subject: Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
> From: solomax666@gmail.com
> To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
>
> could you please check if OM ports are opened?
> 1935 is primary RTMP port
> 8088 is fallback RTMPT port
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> My Openmeetings installation is running perfectly for 1 month but for now
> i'm getting error message as you can see at screenshot below:
>
>
>
>
>
> You can connect to site and see on live.
>
> try 1, try 2 and try 3 message appears and this error dialog appears.
>
> How can i solve this. Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
RE: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
Posted by Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com>.
I've checked them with netstat -an commandBoth of them seems
TCP 0.0.0.0:1935 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:2383 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3306 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:5080 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:8088 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:56:29 +0700
Subject: Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
From: solomax666@gmail.com
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
could you please check if OM ports are opened?1935 is primary RTMP port8088 is fallback RTMPT port
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi.
My Openmeetings installation is running perfectly for 1 month but for now i'm getting error message as you can see at screenshot below:
You can connect to site and see on live.
try 1, try 2 and try 3 message appears and this error dialog appears.
How can i solve this. Thanks.
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
could you please check if OM ports are opened?
1935 is primary RTMP port
8088 is fallback RTMPT port
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> My Openmeetings installation is running perfectly for 1 month but for now
> i'm getting error message as you can see at screenshot below:
>
>
>
>
>
> You can connect to site and see on live.
>
> try 1, try 2 and try 3 message appears and this error dialog appears.
>
> How can i solve this. Thanks.
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
NetConnection.Call.Failed Error On Client Load
Posted by Mert DOĞAN <me...@hotmail.com>.
Hi.
My Openmeetings installation is running perfectly for 1 month but for now i'm getting error message as you can see at screenshot below:
You can connect to site and see on live.
try 1, try 2 and try 3 message appears and this error dialog appears.
How can i solve this. Thanks.
答复： Questions about Openmeetings
Posted by pc...@gmail.com.
Unsubscribe
Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®.
-----Original Message-----
From: Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <ji...@polylink.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org<us...@openmeetings.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
Subject: Questions about Openmeetings
Hi Experts,
I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out?
1. How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it is true?
2. Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the conference? I know it’s the difference between the BBB and OM. BBB will bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference.
3. Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the OM?
4. HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail for 3.0 proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5.
Thanks
Jinjun