You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org> on 2007/03/12 07:38:53 UTC
[ApacheDS] supportedSASLMechanisms added in sasl branch
Enrique,
I added the required SASL mechanisms to the RootDSE. It's very easy to do
here's the commit log:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=517113
Alex
Re: [ApacheDS] supportedSASLMechanisms added in sasl branch
Posted by Enrique Rodriguez <en...@gmail.com>.
On 3/12/07, Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org> wrote:
> ...
> Sure NP let's remove it if you're certain. If you find otherwise we can
> always add it ... it's simple enough to do.
OK, I removed the 'simple' mechanism from the list. Also, I added a
test case to check that the SASL mechanisms are returned from a
RootDSE query.
Enrique
Re: [ApacheDS] supportedSASLMechanisms added in sasl branch
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Thanks Stefan for the feedback. Let's just nix it from the RootDSE.
Alex
On 3/12/07, Stefan Zoerner <st...@labeo.de> wrote:
>
> Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >
> > Sure NP let's remove it if you're certain. If you find otherwise we can
> > always add it ... it's simple enough to do.
> >
>
> I think Enrique is right here. Other LDAP servers (I have checked 3 of
> them) do not return SIMPLE as a value of supportedsaslmechanisms,
> neither, although they support it.
>
> Greetings,
> Stefan
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [ApacheDS] supportedSASLMechanisms added in sasl branch
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
may be because Simple is not a SASL mechanism ;)
On 3/12/07, Stefan Zoerner <st...@labeo.de> wrote:
>
> Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >
> > Sure NP let's remove it if you're certain. If you find otherwise we can
> > always add it ... it's simple enough to do.
> >
>
> I think Enrique is right here. Other LDAP servers (I have checked 3 of
> them) do not return SIMPLE as a value of supportedsaslmechanisms,
> neither, although they support it.
>
> Greetings,
> Stefan
>
>
>
>
>
--
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [ApacheDS] supportedSASLMechanisms added in sasl branch
Posted by Stefan Zoerner <st...@labeo.de>.
Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> Sure NP let's remove it if you're certain. If you find otherwise we can
> always add it ... it's simple enough to do.
>
I think Enrique is right here. Other LDAP servers (I have checked 3 of
them) do not return SIMPLE as a value of supportedsaslmechanisms,
neither, although they support it.
Greetings,
Stefan
Re: [ApacheDS] supportedSASLMechanisms added in sasl branch
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
On 3/12/07, Enrique Rodriguez <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/11/07, Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Enrique,
> >
> > I added the required SASL mechanisms to the RootDSE. It's very easy to
> do
> > here's the commit log:
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=517113
>
> Technically, Simple shouldn't be returned as a SASL mechanism in a
> RootDSE query. But, it should still be supported, of course, by the
> Bind handler. Also, when it comes time to do the XML config, admins
> should be able to disable it. I agree it's easier to think of them
> all as SASL mechanisms. In my code I distinguished between the two in
> the variable names, 'supportedSaslMechanisms' and simply
> 'supportedMechanisms' which includes simple.
>
> I'll take it out of DefaultPartitionNexus, unless there's some reason
> we want to return it.
Sure NP let's remove it if you're certain. If you find otherwise we can
always add it ... it's simple enough to do.
Alex
Re: [ApacheDS] supportedSASLMechanisms added in sasl branch
Posted by Enrique Rodriguez <en...@gmail.com>.
On 3/11/07, Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org> wrote:
> Enrique,
>
> I added the required SASL mechanisms to the RootDSE. It's very easy to do
> here's the commit log:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=517113
Technically, Simple shouldn't be returned as a SASL mechanism in a
RootDSE query. But, it should still be supported, of course, by the
Bind handler. Also, when it comes time to do the XML config, admins
should be able to disable it. I agree it's easier to think of them
all as SASL mechanisms. In my code I distinguished between the two in
the variable names, 'supportedSaslMechanisms' and simply
'supportedMechanisms' which includes simple.
I'll take it out of DefaultPartitionNexus, unless there's some reason
we want to return it.
Enrique