You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by "James Taylor (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/02/12 20:12:18 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (PHOENIX-2680) stats table timestamp incorrectly
used as table timestamp
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
James Taylor reassigned PHOENIX-2680:
-------------------------------------
Assignee: James Taylor
> stats table timestamp incorrectly used as table timestamp
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-2680
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2680
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.6.0
> Reporter: Jan Van Besien
> Assignee: James Taylor
> Fix For: 4.7.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-2680.patch, PHOENIX-2680.patch
>
>
> I think there is a problem introduced by PHOENIX-1390 related to table timestamps.
> We run into a situation where we are unable to drop a table due to a NewerTableAlreadyExistsException. This table was created at a certain timestamp in the past (say 2 years ago) and we try to drop it at a more recent timestamp in the past (say 1 year ago).
> During the drop, the client timestamp (1 year ago) is compared with the table timestamp. The table timestamp should be 2 years ago, but due to this statement on line 856 in MetaDataEndpointImpl:
> {code}
> timeStamp = Math.max(timeStamp, stats.getTimestamp())
> {code}
> the timestamp of the table is set to the timestamp of the stats table, which happens to be something much more recent.
> I think this is wrong?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)