You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/01/26 23:44:23 UTC

[GitHub] [spark] c21 opened a new pull request #31353: [SPARK-34253][SQL] Object hash aggregate should not fallback if no more input rows

c21 opened a new pull request #31353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31353


   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first for naming configurations in
        'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   Object hash aggregate will fallback to sort-based aggregation based on number of keys seen so far [0]. The default config threshold is 128 (spark.sql.objectHashAggregate.sortBased.fallbackThreshold in [1]). There's an edge case we can do better, where we do not fallback if there's no more input rows. Suppose the task only has 128 group-by keys in hash ma, we don't need to fallback in this case, and we can save the extra sort. This is an rare edge case in production, but it can happen.
   
    
   
   [0]: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/ObjectAggregationIterator.scala#L161 
   
   [1]: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala#L1615 
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   To avoid unnecessary sort in query. Save resource.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   No.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add.
   -->
   Add a unit test to verify task fallback or not is challenging. Given the change is pretty minor, besides relying on existing test in `ObjectHashAggregateSuite.scala`, I manually ran the followed query, and verified in debug mode that the code path for fallback was not executed. And verified the code path for fallback was executed without this change.
   
   ```
   withSQLConf(
     SQLConf.USE_OBJECT_HASH_AGG.key -> "true",
     SQLConf.OBJECT_AGG_SORT_BASED_FALLBACK_THRESHOLD.key -> "1") {
     Seq.fill(1)(Tuple1(Array.empty[Int]))
       .toDF("c0")
       .groupBy(lit(1))
       .agg(typed_count($"c0"), max($"c0")).collect()
   }
   ```


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] c21 commented on pull request #31353: [SPARK-34253][SQL] Object hash aggregate should not fallback if no more input rows

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
c21 commented on pull request #31353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31353#issuecomment-768887641


   cc @maropu, thanks.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] maropu commented on a change in pull request #31353: [SPARK-34253][SQL] Object hash aggregate should not fallback if no more input rows

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
maropu commented on a change in pull request #31353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31353#discussion_r566069710



##########
File path: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/ObjectAggregationIterator.scala
##########
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ class ObjectAggregationIterator(
         processRow(buffer, newInput)
 
         // The hash map gets too large, makes a sorted spill and clear the map.
-        if (hashMap.size >= fallbackCountThreshold) {
+        if (hashMap.size >= fallbackCountThreshold && inputRows.hasNext) {

Review comment:
       Ah, ok. I've checked the code and the fix looks reasonable.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan closed pull request #31353: [SPARK-34253][SQL] Object hash aggregate should not fallback if no more input rows

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
cloud-fan closed pull request #31353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31353


   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] c21 commented on pull request #31353: [SPARK-34253][SQL] Object hash aggregate should not fallback if no more input rows

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
c21 commented on pull request #31353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31353#issuecomment-767903889


   cc @cloud-fan could you help take a look? Thanks.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] c21 commented on pull request #31353: [SPARK-34253][SQL] Object hash aggregate should not fallback if no more input rows

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
c21 commented on pull request #31353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31353#issuecomment-769258569


   Thank you @maropu and @cloud-fan for review!


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] c21 commented on pull request #31353: [SPARK-34253][SQL] Object hash aggregate should not fallback if no more input rows

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
c21 commented on pull request #31353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31353#issuecomment-769258360


   > btw, '0' above is just a typo?
   
   @maropu - It was meant to be a link, I was typing `[0]` to give a reference link. Sorry for confusion.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] maropu commented on pull request #31353: [SPARK-34253][SQL] Object hash aggregate should not fallback if no more input rows

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
maropu commented on pull request #31353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31353#issuecomment-769032012


   > ...based on number of keys seen so far 0. 
   
   btw, '`0`' above is just a typo?


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on pull request #31353: [SPARK-34253][SQL] Object hash aggregate should not fallback if no more input rows

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
cloud-fan commented on pull request #31353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31353#issuecomment-769157058


   thanks, merging to master!


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #31353: [SPARK-34253][SQL] Object hash aggregate should not fallback if no more input rows

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #31353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31353#issuecomment-767925915






----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org