[Bug 59696] New: Suppress output of GET HTTP Requests

[bu...@apache.org]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59696

            Bug ID: 59696
           Summary: Suppress output of GET HTTP Requests
           Product: JMeter
           Version: 3.0
          Hardware: PC
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTTP
          Assignee: issues@jmeter.apache.org
          Reporter: admin@packcat.net

Some HTTP Requests are better than others.
For example, I use a lot of REST init-config GET to fill a form,
and then submit the form PUT to create a new record with the next HTTP request.

This is especially helpful for html report writer where I only need to see the
PUT records, and not the GET records. Either configurable, or an additional
checkbox to the HTML Request Dialog.

You can even add exceptions for errors.

Thanks,
John

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 59696] Suppress output of GET HTTP Requests

[bu...@apache.org]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59696

--- Comment #3 from Sebb <se...@apache.org> ---
(In reply to Felix Schumacher from comment #2)
> So basically you want a flag to include/exclude samples from the result
> (tree/table) listeners?
> 
> I think it would be even better, if that decision could be delegated to a
> PostProcessor, which could add/clear a flag on the sample and the listener
> could then use that flag to decide, whether the sample should be displayed,
> or not.

A Pre-Processor sounds more suitable to me.
Then the sampler need not store any data.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 59696] Suppress output of GET HTTP Requests

[bu...@apache.org]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59696

--- Comment #4 from John Pierce <ad...@packcat.net> ---
> A Pre-Processor sounds more suitable to me.
> Then the sampler need not store any data.

Actually, I am using JSON Path in the GET Call (return Default Values) to
capture the response message as a primer for the following Create HTTP Request.

So, I am temporarily saving at least 1 value.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 59696] Suppress output of GET HTTP Requests

[bu...@apache.org]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59696

John Pierce <ad...@packcat.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |admin@packcat.net

--- Comment #1 from John Pierce <ad...@packcat.net> ---
Created attachment 33946
  --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33946&action=edit
Example of Sampler HTTP Request Output (image)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 59696] Suppress output of GET HTTP Requests

[bu...@apache.org]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59696

Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 OS|                            |All

--- Comment #2 from Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> ---
So basically you want a flag to include/exclude samples from the result
(tree/table) listeners?

I think it would be even better, if that decision could be delegated to a
PostProcessor, which could add/clear a flag on the sample and the listener
could then use that flag to decide, whether the sample should be displayed, or
not.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.