You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> on 2005/12/17 16:26:31 UTC
Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
In Process
GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in the
geronimo.apache.org site
GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack trace
GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
Completed
GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files - applied by Matt
GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per Dain
GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by Matt
I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a build tonight
if all these issues are addressed or we know they will not be. The major ones
are behind us. It sounds like we're going to have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or
some such release per the fix from Dain.
Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to yourself or send a
note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what the others are doing.
Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning (EST) and will get
back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some reason please feel free
to call my cell (919)656-0564.
Cheers.
Matt
Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
Ok thanks...
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
>
> I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
>
> However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
> GERONIMO-1377. So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses the 1377
> problem. Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some other fix in
> head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this? Last time I
> built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host" error.
>
> Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a showstopper..
> Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no functional
> problem is totally accurate. However, I suspect the presence of this
> message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and many
> questions among new v1 users. It may give the wrong initial perception
> that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
>
> Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will
> somehow be moved to v1..
>
> On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown ..
>
> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
>
> Is this covered under any other JIRA?
>
> BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
>
> Thanks
> -Dave-
>
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>>
>> In Process
>> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in the
>> geronimo.apache.org site
>> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
>> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack trace
>> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
>>
>> Completed
>> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files -
>> applied by Matt
>> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per Dain
>> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by Matt
>>
>> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a
>> build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they will
>> not be. The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're going to
>> have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix from
>> Dain.
>>
>> Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to yourself or
>> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what the
>> others are doing.
>>
>> Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
>>
>> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning (EST) and
>> will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some
>> reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
So are we ready to spin up another set of binaries now?
-dain
On Dec 17, 2005, at 5:04 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> Its fixed...I set a defaultHost GBean reference in the engine.
>
> David Jencks wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>
>>> The Engine is starting before the host.
>>>
>>> After chatting with Dain...the problem seems to be...
>>>
>>> The plan is looking for a collection of hosts. But this does not
>>> seem
>>> to place the dependency when there is a collection, only when its a
>>> single GBean reference. Therefore its random of who gets started
>>> first...call it luck of the draw? Therefore, this can rear its
>>> head in
>>> HEAD (no pun intended).
>>>
>>> The problem stems from the fact that the user can have "n" number of
>>> hosts...and the Engine needs to wait until all of these are started.
>>>
>>> I would have hoped that the Collection reference would act like a
>>> direct
>>> GBean reference and wait until all have started, but this was my
>>> misunderstanding. Can this be a problem for other GBeans that have
>>> collection dependencies down the road - not just for Tomcat?
>>>
>>> IMHO, I think the fact the Engine is starting before the Hosts is
>>> dangerous and very bad.
>>>
>>> I'll work on a solution of some form...
>>
>> The only possibility I've thought of so far is a linked list starting
>> with the Engine with a reference to the first or last Host, and each
>> Host with a reference to another. I use something like this to order
>> the servlet startup in jetty.
>>
>> david jencks
>>
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>> Does anybody know why the "unknown default host" warning still
>>>> occurs in
>>>> 1.0 but not in head? I thought Dain's fix was picked up by both
>>>> 1.0 and
>>>> head? I also thought the next 1.0 candidate build would be made
>>>> from
>>>> the 1.0 branch and not head? Is this incorrect?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Dave-
>>>>
>>>> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>>> I was too darn quick with my send button...
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes...let me follow up...
>>>>>
>>>>> Building form HEAD...this error (1377) does not occur...I
>>>>> should have
>>>>> made that more clear in all of my previous emails.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in
>>>>>> GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
>>>>>> GERONIMO-1377. So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses
>>>>>> the 1377
>>>>>> problem. Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some
>>>>>> other fix in
>>>>>> head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this? Last
>>>>>> time I
>>>>>> built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host"
>>>>>> error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a
>>>>>> showstopper..
>>>>>> Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no
>>>>>> functional
>>>>>> problem is totally accurate. However, I suspect the presence
>>>>>> of this
>>>>>> message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and
>>>>>> many
>>>>>> questions among new v1 users. It may give the wrong initial
>>>>>> perception
>>>>>> that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will
>>>>>> somehow be moved to v1..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown ..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this covered under any other JIRA?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In Process
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP
>>>>>>> redirects in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> geronimo.apache.org site
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce
>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>> trace
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default
>>>>>>> host.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Completed
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files -
>>>>>>> applied by Matt
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed
>>>>>>> per Dain
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly -
>>>>>>> Applied by
>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and
>>>>>>> respin a
>>>>>>> build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know
>>>>>>> they will
>>>>>>> not be. The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're
>>>>>>> going to
>>>>>>> have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the
>>>>>>> fix from
>>>>>>> Dain.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to
>>>>>>> yourself or
>>>>>>> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows
>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> others are doing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning
>>>>>>> (EST) and
>>>>>>> will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some
>>>>>>> reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
565-81F6-4DB1-AFD9-A7F74086DA04@iq80.com>
In-Reply-To: <69...@iq80.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MMS-Smtp-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1
X-MMS-Smtp-Auth: Authenticated As matt@hogstrom.org
X-MMS-Smtp-Mailer-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1
Yup...just sent out a note in a new thread.
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> So are we ready to spin up another set of binaries now?
>
> -dain
>
> On Dec 17, 2005, at 5:04 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
>> Its fixed...I set a defaultHost GBean reference in the engine.
>>
>> David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Engine is starting before the host.
>>>>
>>>> After chatting with Dain...the problem seems to be...
>>>>
>>>> The plan is looking for a collection of hosts. But this does not seem
>>>> to place the dependency when there is a collection, only when its a
>>>> single GBean reference. Therefore its random of who gets started
>>>> first...call it luck of the draw? Therefore, this can rear its
>>>> head in
>>>> HEAD (no pun intended).
>>>>
>>>> The problem stems from the fact that the user can have "n" number of
>>>> hosts...and the Engine needs to wait until all of these are started.
>>>>
>>>> I would have hoped that the Collection reference would act like a
>>>> direct
>>>> GBean reference and wait until all have started, but this was my
>>>> misunderstanding. Can this be a problem for other GBeans that have
>>>> collection dependencies down the road - not just for Tomcat?
>>>>
>>>> IMHO, I think the fact the Engine is starting before the Hosts is
>>>> dangerous and very bad.
>>>>
>>>> I'll work on a solution of some form...
>>>
>>>
>>> The only possibility I've thought of so far is a linked list starting
>>> with the Engine with a reference to the first or last Host, and each
>>> Host with a reference to another. I use something like this to order
>>> the servlet startup in jetty.
>>>
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jeff
>>>>
>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does anybody know why the "unknown default host" warning still
>>>>> occurs in
>>>>> 1.0 but not in head? I thought Dain's fix was picked up by both
>>>>> 1.0 and
>>>>> head? I also thought the next 1.0 candidate build would be made from
>>>>> the 1.0 branch and not head? Is this incorrect?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I was too darn quick with my send button...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes...let me follow up...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Building form HEAD...this error (1377) does not occur...I should
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> made that more clear in all of my previous emails.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1377. So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses the
>>>>>>> 1377
>>>>>>> problem. Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some other
>>>>>>> fix in
>>>>>>> head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this? Last time I
>>>>>>> built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host"
>>>>>>> error.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a
>>>>>>> showstopper..
>>>>>>> Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no
>>>>>>> functional
>>>>>>> problem is totally accurate. However, I suspect the presence of
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and many
>>>>>>> questions among new v1 users. It may give the wrong initial
>>>>>>> perception
>>>>>>> that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will
>>>>>>> somehow be moved to v1..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown ..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this covered under any other JIRA?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In Process
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> geronimo.apache.org site
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack
>>>>>>>> trace
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Completed
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files -
>>>>>>>> applied by Matt
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per
>>>>>>>> Dain
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by
>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a
>>>>>>>> build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> not be. The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're
>>>>>>>> going to
>>>>>>>> have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> Dain.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to
>>>>>>>> yourself or
>>>>>>>> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> others are doing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning
>>>>>>>> (EST) and
>>>>>>>> will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some
>>>>>>>> reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
Its fixed...I set a defaultHost GBean reference in the engine.
David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
>> The Engine is starting before the host.
>>
>> After chatting with Dain...the problem seems to be...
>>
>> The plan is looking for a collection of hosts. But this does not seem
>> to place the dependency when there is a collection, only when its a
>> single GBean reference. Therefore its random of who gets started
>> first...call it luck of the draw? Therefore, this can rear its head in
>> HEAD (no pun intended).
>>
>> The problem stems from the fact that the user can have "n" number of
>> hosts...and the Engine needs to wait until all of these are started.
>>
>> I would have hoped that the Collection reference would act like a direct
>> GBean reference and wait until all have started, but this was my
>> misunderstanding. Can this be a problem for other GBeans that have
>> collection dependencies down the road - not just for Tomcat?
>>
>> IMHO, I think the fact the Engine is starting before the Hosts is
>> dangerous and very bad.
>>
>> I'll work on a solution of some form...
>
> The only possibility I've thought of so far is a linked list starting
> with the Engine with a reference to the first or last Host, and each
> Host with a reference to another. I use something like this to order
> the servlet startup in jetty.
>
> david jencks
>
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>> Does anybody know why the "unknown default host" warning still occurs in
>>> 1.0 but not in head? I thought Dain's fix was picked up by both 1.0 and
>>> head? I also thought the next 1.0 candidate build would be made from
>>> the 1.0 branch and not head? Is this incorrect?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Dave-
>>>
>>> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>> I was too darn quick with my send button...
>>>>
>>>> Yes...let me follow up...
>>>>
>>>> Building form HEAD...this error (1377) does not occur...I should have
>>>> made that more clear in all of my previous emails.
>>>>
>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
>>>>>
>>>>> I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
>>>>> GERONIMO-1377. So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses the 1377
>>>>> problem. Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some other fix in
>>>>> head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this? Last time I
>>>>> built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host"
>>>>> error.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a
>>>>> showstopper..
>>>>> Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no functional
>>>>> problem is totally accurate. However, I suspect the presence of this
>>>>> message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and many
>>>>> questions among new v1 users. It may give the wrong initial
>>>>> perception
>>>>> that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will
>>>>> somehow be moved to v1..
>>>>>
>>>>> On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown ..
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this covered under any other JIRA?
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In Process
>>>>>> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> geronimo.apache.org site
>>>>>> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
>>>>>> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack
>>>>>> trace
>>>>>> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Completed
>>>>>> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files -
>>>>>> applied by Matt
>>>>>> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per Dain
>>>>>> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by
>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a
>>>>>> build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they will
>>>>>> not be. The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're going to
>>>>>> have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix from
>>>>>> Dain.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to
>>>>>> yourself or
>>>>>> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> others are doing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning (EST) and
>>>>>> will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some
>>>>>> reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> The Engine is starting before the host.
>
> After chatting with Dain...the problem seems to be...
>
> The plan is looking for a collection of hosts. But this does not seem
> to place the dependency when there is a collection, only when its a
> single GBean reference. Therefore its random of who gets started
> first...call it luck of the draw? Therefore, this can rear its
> head in
> HEAD (no pun intended).
>
> The problem stems from the fact that the user can have "n" number of
> hosts...and the Engine needs to wait until all of these are started.
>
> I would have hoped that the Collection reference would act like a
> direct
> GBean reference and wait until all have started, but this was my
> misunderstanding. Can this be a problem for other GBeans that have
> collection dependencies down the road - not just for Tomcat?
>
> IMHO, I think the fact the Engine is starting before the Hosts is
> dangerous and very bad.
>
> I'll work on a solution of some form...
The only possibility I've thought of so far is a linked list starting
with the Engine with a reference to the first or last Host, and each
Host with a reference to another. I use something like this to order
the servlet startup in jetty.
david jencks
>
> Jeff
>
> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>> Does anybody know why the "unknown default host" warning still
>> occurs in
>> 1.0 but not in head? I thought Dain's fix was picked up by both
>> 1.0 and
>> head? I also thought the next 1.0 candidate build would be made from
>> the 1.0 branch and not head? Is this incorrect?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Dave-
>>
>> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>> I was too darn quick with my send button...
>>>
>>> Yes...let me follow up...
>>>
>>> Building form HEAD...this error (1377) does not occur...I should
>>> have
>>> made that more clear in all of my previous emails.
>>>
>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
>>>>
>>>> I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in
>>>> GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
>>>> GERONIMO-1377. So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses the
>>>> 1377
>>>> problem. Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some other
>>>> fix in
>>>> head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this? Last time I
>>>> built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default
>>>> host" error.
>>>>
>>>> Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a
>>>> showstopper..
>>>> Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no
>>>> functional
>>>> problem is totally accurate. However, I suspect the presence of
>>>> this
>>>> message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and many
>>>> questions among new v1 users. It may give the wrong initial
>>>> perception
>>>> that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will
>>>> somehow be moved to v1..
>>>>
>>>> On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown ..
>>>>
>>>> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
>>>>
>>>> Is this covered under any other JIRA?
>>>>
>>>> BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Dave-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>>>>>
>>>>> In Process
>>>>> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects
>>>>> in the
>>>>> geronimo.apache.org site
>>>>> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
>>>>> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce
>>>>> stack trace
>>>>> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
>>>>>
>>>>> Completed
>>>>> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files -
>>>>> applied by Matt
>>>>> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per
>>>>> Dain
>>>>> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied
>>>>> by Matt
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a
>>>>> build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they
>>>>> will
>>>>> not be. The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're
>>>>> going to
>>>>> have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix
>>>>> from
>>>>> Dain.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to
>>>>> yourself or
>>>>> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows
>>>>> what the
>>>>> others are doing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning
>>>>> (EST) and
>>>>> will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some
>>>>> reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
The Engine is starting before the host.
After chatting with Dain...the problem seems to be...
The plan is looking for a collection of hosts. But this does not seem
to place the dependency when there is a collection, only when its a
single GBean reference. Therefore its random of who gets started
first...call it luck of the draw? Therefore, this can rear its head in
HEAD (no pun intended).
The problem stems from the fact that the user can have "n" number of
hosts...and the Engine needs to wait until all of these are started.
I would have hoped that the Collection reference would act like a direct
GBean reference and wait until all have started, but this was my
misunderstanding. Can this be a problem for other GBeans that have
collection dependencies down the road - not just for Tomcat?
IMHO, I think the fact the Engine is starting before the Hosts is
dangerous and very bad.
I'll work on a solution of some form...
Jeff
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> Does anybody know why the "unknown default host" warning still occurs in
> 1.0 but not in head? I thought Dain's fix was picked up by both 1.0 and
> head? I also thought the next 1.0 candidate build would be made from
> the 1.0 branch and not head? Is this incorrect?
>
> Thanks
> -Dave-
>
> Jeff Genender wrote:
>> I was too darn quick with my send button...
>>
>> Yes...let me follow up...
>>
>> Building form HEAD...this error (1377) does not occur...I should have
>> made that more clear in all of my previous emails.
>>
>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>
>>> I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
>>>
>>> I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
>>>
>>> However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
>>> GERONIMO-1377. So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses the 1377
>>> problem. Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some other fix in
>>> head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this? Last time I
>>> built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host" error.
>>>
>>> Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a showstopper..
>>> Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no functional
>>> problem is totally accurate. However, I suspect the presence of this
>>> message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and many
>>> questions among new v1 users. It may give the wrong initial perception
>>> that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
>>>
>>> Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will
>>> somehow be moved to v1..
>>>
>>> On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown ..
>>>
>>> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
>>>
>>> Is this covered under any other JIRA?
>>>
>>> BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Dave-
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>>>>
>>>> In Process
>>>> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in the
>>>> geronimo.apache.org site
>>>> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
>>>> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack trace
>>>> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
>>>>
>>>> Completed
>>>> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files -
>>>> applied by Matt
>>>> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per Dain
>>>> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by Matt
>>>>
>>>> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a
>>>> build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they will
>>>> not be. The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're going to
>>>> have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix from
>>>> Dain.
>>>>
>>>> Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to yourself or
>>>> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what the
>>>> others are doing.
>>>>
>>>> Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
>>>>
>>>> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning (EST) and
>>>> will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some
>>>> reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers.
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Posted by Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net>.
Does anybody know why the "unknown default host" warning still occurs in
1.0 but not in head? I thought Dain's fix was picked up by both 1.0
and head? I also thought the next 1.0 candidate build would be made
from the 1.0 branch and not head? Is this incorrect?
Thanks
-Dave-
Jeff Genender wrote:
> I was too darn quick with my send button...
>
> Yes...let me follow up...
>
> Building form HEAD...this error (1377) does not occur...I should have
> made that more clear in all of my previous emails.
>
> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>
>>I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
>>
>>I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
>>
>>However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
>>GERONIMO-1377. So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses the 1377
>>problem. Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some other fix in
>>head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this? Last time I
>>built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host" error.
>>
>>Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a showstopper..
>> Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no functional
>>problem is totally accurate. However, I suspect the presence of this
>>message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and many
>>questions among new v1 users. It may give the wrong initial perception
>>that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
>>
>>Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will
>>somehow be moved to v1..
>>
>>On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown ..
>>
>>http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
>>
>>Is this covered under any other JIRA?
>>
>>BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
>>
>>Thanks
>>-Dave-
>>
>>
>>Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>>>Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>>>
>>>In Process
>>>GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in the
>>>geronimo.apache.org site
>>>GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
>>>GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack trace
>>>GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
>>>
>>>Completed
>>>GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files -
>>>applied by Matt
>>>GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per Dain
>>>GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by Matt
>>>
>>>I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a
>>>build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they will
>>>not be. The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're going to
>>>have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix from
>>>Dain.
>>>
>>>Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to yourself or
>>>send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what the
>>>others are doing.
>>>
>>>Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
>>>
>>>I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning (EST) and
>>>will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some
>>>reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>>>
>>>Cheers.
>>>
>>>Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
I was too darn quick with my send button...
Yes...let me follow up...
Building form HEAD...this error (1377) does not occur...I should have
made that more clear in all of my previous emails.
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
>
> I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
>
> However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
> GERONIMO-1377. So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses the 1377
> problem. Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some other fix in
> head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this? Last time I
> built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host" error.
>
> Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a showstopper..
> Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no functional
> problem is totally accurate. However, I suspect the presence of this
> message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and many
> questions among new v1 users. It may give the wrong initial perception
> that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
>
> Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will
> somehow be moved to v1..
>
> On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown ..
>
> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
>
> Is this covered under any other JIRA?
>
> BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
>
> Thanks
> -Dave-
>
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>>
>> In Process
>> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in the
>> geronimo.apache.org site
>> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
>> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack trace
>> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
>>
>> Completed
>> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files -
>> applied by Matt
>> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per Dain
>> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by Matt
>>
>> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a
>> build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they will
>> not be. The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're going to
>> have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix from
>> Dain.
>>
>> Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to yourself or
>> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what the
>> others are doing.
>>
>> Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
>>
>> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning (EST) and
>> will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some
>> reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Posted by Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net>.
I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
GERONIMO-1377. So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses the 1377
problem. Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some other fix in
head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this? Last time I
built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host" error.
Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a showstopper..
Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no functional
problem is totally accurate. However, I suspect the presence of this
message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and many
questions among new v1 users. It may give the wrong initial perception
that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will
somehow be moved to v1..
On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown ..
http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
Is this covered under any other JIRA?
BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
Thanks
-Dave-
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>
> In Process
> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in the
> geronimo.apache.org site
> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack trace
> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
>
> Completed
> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files - applied
> by Matt
> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per Dain
> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by Matt
>
> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a build
> tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they will not be.
> The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're going to have to
> spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix from Dain.
>
> Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to yourself or
> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what the
> others are doing.
>
> Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
>
> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning (EST) and
> will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some reason
> please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
FYI, I put a patch out there to quiet the error notifications in
GERONIMO-1375. It affects the security, tomcat, and jetty components in
minor ways. Not sure if this is the best way to fix this. However,
since invalid userid/pwd are typical failures I felt that debug messages
were more appropriate rather than warning (which is more in line with
what tomcat had anyway).
I also put a UI fix out there for the login error page which was missed
earlier when the main login page was updated to remove the links and add
the About image. It's GERONIMO-1379 and only affects the login and
login error JSPs.
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>
> In Process
> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in the
> geronimo.apache.org site
> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack trace
> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
>
> Completed
> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files - applied
> by Matt
> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per Dain
> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by Matt
>
> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a build
> tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they will not be.
> The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're going to have to
> spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix from Dain.
>
> Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to yourself or
> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what the
> others are doing.
>
> Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
>
> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning (EST) and
> will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some reason
> please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
--
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn@earthlink.net
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot
lose." -- Jim Elliot
Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
I'll take 1377. At this point I am no longer seeing the error after
receiving the fixes so far. Can others please try Tomcat from head
(since this was intermittent) and see if these errors still persist?
I'll give it a few days and if I hear no issues I will close it out.
I am pretty sure it was connected since the starting of the web app
forced Tomcat to run it and it had no Host to apply it to.
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>
> In Process
> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in the
> geronimo.apache.org site
> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack trace
> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
>
> Completed
> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files - applied
> by Matt
> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per Dain
> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by Matt
>
> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a build
> tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they will not be.
> The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're going to have to
> spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix from Dain.
>
> Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to yourself or
> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what the
> others are doing.
>
> Great work folks. I think we're almost there.
>
> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning (EST) and
> will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some reason
> please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Matt