You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> on 2024/06/10 14:03:50 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Hi everyone,
I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more
than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec
2.1
*SVN Tag*
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
*Staging repo*
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
*Sources*
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
*Dist*
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
*The release notes are *
Bug
- [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>]
- InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same
address
- [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>]
- RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
of votes are reached.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
--
Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org>.
Hey all,
anyone available to close this [VOTE]? It has been pending for _3 months_ now.
As far as I can tell this release has the following votes:
- Romain: -0 (binding)
- Francois Papon: +1 (binding)
- Richard Zowalla: +1 (non binding)
- Jean-Baptiste Onofré: +1 (binding)
- Jonathan Gallimore: +1 (non binding)
- Daniel Dias Dos Santos: +1 (non binding)
- Mark Struberg: +1 (binding)
That's a total of three binding +1 VOTEs and no -1 (just a -0 which is fine AFAIK), so as Richard said this release passed. Just needs someone to do the manual work now to finish and announce it.
I'd highly appreciate if we can get this done before we do another milestone release on the TomEE side of things.
Thanks
Markus
On 2024/09/19 11:51:18 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> I think we have sufficient votes now. Can we proceed with this release? It is pending for > 1 month now.
>
> On 2024/08/10 11:40:57 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> > @JL Has enough votes now? Can we proceed here? Thx
> >
> > On 2024/07/22 16:21:21 Mark Struberg via dev wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > LueGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > > > Am 10.06.2024 um 16:03 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec 2.1
> > > >
> > > > SVN Tag
> > > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> > > >
> > > > Staging repo
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
> > > >
> > > > Sources
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
> > > >
> > > > Dist
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> > > >
> > > > The release notes are
> > > > Bug
> > > >
> > > > [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>] - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same address
> > > > [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>] - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number of votes are reached.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Louis
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org>.
I think we have sufficient votes now. Can we proceed with this release? It is pending for > 1 month now.
On 2024/08/10 11:40:57 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> @JL Has enough votes now? Can we proceed here? Thx
>
> On 2024/07/22 16:21:21 Mark Struberg via dev wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > LueGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > > Am 10.06.2024 um 16:03 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec 2.1
> > >
> > > SVN Tag
> > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> > >
> > > Staging repo
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
> > >
> > > Sources
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
> > >
> > > Dist
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> > >
> > > The release notes are
> > > Bug
> > >
> > > [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>] - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same address
> > > [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>] - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number of votes are reached.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org>.
@JL Has enough votes now? Can we proceed here? Thx
On 2024/07/22 16:21:21 Mark Struberg via dev wrote:
> +1
>
> LueGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 10.06.2024 um 16:03 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec 2.1
> >
> > SVN Tag
> > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> >
> > Staging repo
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
> >
> > Sources
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
> >
> > Dist
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> >
> > The release notes are
> > Bug
> >
> > [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>] - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same address
> > [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>] - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number of votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > --
> > Jean-Louis
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Mark Struberg via dev <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
+1
LueGrue,
strub
> Am 10.06.2024 um 16:03 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec 2.1
>
> SVN Tag
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> Staging repo
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
>
> Sources
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>
> Dist
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> The release notes are
> Bug
>
> [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>] - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same address
> [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>] - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> --
> Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Richard Zowalla <ri...@zowalla.com>.
+1 (non binding)
> Am 11.06.2024 um 08:40 schrieb Francois Papon <fr...@openobject.fr>:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks!
>
> regards,
>
> François
>
> On 10/06/2024 16:03, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec 2.1
>>
>> SVN Tag
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>>
>> Staging repo
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
>>
>> Sources
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>>
>> Dist
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>>
>> The release notes are
>> Bug
>>
>> [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>] - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same address
>> [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>] - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number of votes are reached.
>>
>> Please vote accordingly:
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> --
>> Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Francois Papon <fr...@openobject.fr>.
+1 (binding)
Thanks!
regards,
François
On 10/06/2024 16:03, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's
> more than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta
> Mail spec 2.1
>
> *_SVN Tag_*
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> *_Staging repo_*
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
>
> *_Sources_*
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>
> *_Dist_*
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> *_The release notes are _*
>
>
> Bug
>
> * [GERONIMO-6869
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>] -
> InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the
> same address
> * [GERONIMO-6870
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>] - RFC822
> violation with duplicated headers
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> number of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> --
> Jean-Louis
[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
Closing this vote (yes, more than overdue).
With my +1 (binding), we've got so far
- Romain: -0 (binding)
- Francois Papon, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Mark Struberg, Jean-Baptiste: 4 +1
(binding)
- Richard Zowalla, Jonathan Gallimore, Daniel Dias Dos Santos: 3 +1 (non
binding)
Vote passes. I'll proceed with the release.
Best regards
Le lun. 10 juin 2024 à 16:03, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more
> than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec
> 2.1
>
> *SVN Tag*
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> *Staging repo*
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
>
> *Sources*
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>
> *Dist*
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> *The release notes are *
> Bug
>
> - [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>]
> - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same
> address
> - [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>]
> - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> --
> Jean-Louis
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 4:03 PM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec 2.1
>
> SVN Tag
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> Staging repo
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
>
> Sources
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>
> Dist
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> The release notes are
>
> Bug
>
> [GERONIMO-6869] - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same address
> [GERONIMO-6870] - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> --
> Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Daniel Dias Dos Santos <da...@gmail.com>.
Hello +1
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, 02:29 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Sorry for the delay ...
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 9:33 PM Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Ping ping :)
> >
> > On 2024/06/25 08:32:42 Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > On 2024/06/10 14:03:50 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's
> more
> > > > than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail
> spec
> > > > 2.1
> > > >
> > > > *SVN Tag*
> > > >
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> > > >
> > > > *Staging repo*
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
> > > >
> > > > *Sources*
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
> > > >
> > > > *Dist*
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> > > >
> > > > *The release notes are *
> > > > Bug
> > > >
> > > > - [GERONIMO-6869 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>]
> > > > - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints
> the same
> > > > address
> > > > - [GERONIMO-6870 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>]
> > > > - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> number
> > > > of votes are reached.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Louis
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (binding)
Sorry for the delay ...
Regards
JB
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 9:33 PM Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Ping ping :)
>
> On 2024/06/25 08:32:42 Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On 2024/06/10 14:03:50 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more
> > > than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec
> > > 2.1
> > >
> > > *SVN Tag*
> > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> > >
> > > *Staging repo*
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
> > >
> > > *Sources*
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
> > >
> > > *Dist*
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> > >
> > > *The release notes are *
> > > Bug
> > >
> > > - [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>]
> > > - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same
> > > address
> > > - [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>]
> > > - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
> > >
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > > of votes are reached.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis
> > >
> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org>.
Ping ping :)
On 2024/06/25 08:32:42 Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> +1
>
> Jon
>
> On 2024/06/10 14:03:50 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more
> > than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec
> > 2.1
> >
> > *SVN Tag*
> > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> >
> > *Staging repo*
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
> >
> > *Sources*
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
> >
> > *Dist*
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
> >
> > *The release notes are *
> > Bug
> >
> > - [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>]
> > - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same
> > address
> > - [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>]
> > - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
> >
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > of votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > --
> > Jean-Louis
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jg...@apache.org>.
+1
Jon
On 2024/06/10 14:03:50 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more
> than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec
> 2.1
>
> *SVN Tag*
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> *Staging repo*
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
>
> *Sources*
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>
> *Dist*
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> *The release notes are *
> Bug
>
> - [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>]
> - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same
> address
> - [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>]
> - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> --
> Jean-Louis
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
AFAIK GERONIMO-6870 prevents duplicated headers until it is in the
hardcoded whitelist so -0 since it does not seem to match the mail usage
these days (gmail for ex) - please correct me if I missed something (like a
toggle or alike).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le lun. 10 juin 2024 à 16:04, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more
> than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec
> 2.1
>
> *SVN Tag*
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> *Staging repo*
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
>
> *Sources*
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>
> *Dist*
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> *The release notes are *
> Bug
>
> - [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>]
> - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same
> address
> - [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>]
> - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> --
> Jean-Louis
>