You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org> on 2006/03/10 02:04:02 UTC
sa-update channel mirrors?
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:58:02AM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.spamassassin.org wrote:
> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4788
> ------- Additional Comments From felicity@apache.org 2006-03-10 00:58 -------
> (In reply to comment #31)
> > OK, as long as nobody (SARE?) beats us to setting up an update channel for 3.1.1
> > I'm happy.
>
> Just to make everyone happy, I'll make a 3.1.* (not 3.1.0) update available with the current files.
So right after I sent this, something occured to me... We're going to want to
have some kind of mirror infrastructure setup for updates. Right now things
are setup to use nyud.net, but I don't know if we want something different?
Thoughts?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"... now a branch instruction is like bringing a case of beer to the
party ..." - Prof. Michaelson
Re: sa-update channel mirrors?
Posted by "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <sp...@dostech.ca>.
On 09/03/06 08:04 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> So right after I sent this, something occured to me... We're going to want to
> have some kind of mirror infrastructure setup for updates. Right now things
> are setup to use nyud.net, but I don't know if we want something different?
> Thoughts?
nyud.net:8090 is a mirroring system. I'd think it'd make more sense to
use the Apache mirroring system if possible, but the nyud.net:8090 thing
should suffice for now.
Daryl
Re: sa-update channel mirrors?
Posted by "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <sp...@dostech.ca>.
On 09/03/06 09:41 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Yes. It may be sufficient, I was just wondering if we wanted to do up
> anything extra or different. I also don't know if the nyud.net folks
> will mind us providing updates through their system. (I'd have to read
> up more on their service.)
I read their terms back when it was first decided to use it, and I seem
to recall that they were OK with it.
Re: sa-update channel mirrors?
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:50:57PM +1300, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Our distros are already automatically mirrored at all the Apache mirrors. If
> you go to the http://spamassassin.apache.org download link you end up being
> directed to click on a link to a mirror site from http://www.apache.org/mirrors/
The problem is that anything using the Apache mirror system gets the files put
into archive, which we don't want. They made the system assuming software
releases, not for things with our frequent rule deployment schedule.
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:00:20PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> nyud.net:8090 is a mirroring system. I'd think it'd make more sense to
> use the Apache mirroring system if possible, but the nyud.net:8090 thing
> should suffice for now.
Yes. It may be sufficient, I was just wondering if we wanted to do up
anything extra or different. I also don't know if the nyud.net folks
will mind us providing updates through their system. (I'd have to read
up more on their service.)
BTW: I did put up a 3.1.1 update and it's going through nyud.net.
A preliminary doc to do the manual updates is available at
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ManualRuleUpdates
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Monday is a bad way to spend 1/7 of your life.
Re: sa-update channel mirrors?
Posted by Sidney Markowitz <si...@sidney.com>.
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> We're going to want to
> have some kind of mirror infrastructure setup for updates
Our distros are already automatically mirrored at all the Apache mirrors. If
you go to the http://spamassassin.apache.org download link you end up being
directed to click on a link to a mirror site from http://www.apache.org/mirrors/
Is there some sort of load balancing way of selecting one of them that does not
require the manual click?
-- sidney