You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@aries.apache.org by zoe slattery <zo...@googlemail.com> on 2010/08/10 18:54:11 UTC
Release?
Hi all
What does anyone think about a second release? The last one was in May
and since then my brief trawl around JIRA indicates that we have:
Fixed 25 bugs
Made 21 improvements
Added 4 new features
I made a branch of the code yesterday
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/branches/0.2-incubating-RCx/)
and could go on and base a 0.2 release on that branch. I'd like to get
one out because we fixed a few things in the blog sample which make it
easier for people to run and it feels like enough has been fixed
generally to make it worth doing.
WDYT?
Zoe
Re: Release?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@gmail.com>.
I just confirmed the same issue is present in the 0.2-incubating branch.
Joe
On 8/11/10 5:48 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> Oh ... I should also point out that I encountered this error using
> trunk. I still need to verify if it is present in the 0.2 branch as well.
>
> Joe
>
>
> On 8/11/10 5:42 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>
>> I also just noticed an error while using some of our samples with JPA.
>> I'm not yet sure if this is a problem with the samples or the JPA layer
>> ... but I'd like to have have a fix or at least understand what is going
>> on before we attempt a release.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-378
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> On 8/11/10 8:27 AM, Timothy Ward wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to wait for the Quiesce Management bundle to be finished so
>>> that it can be in 0.2. At the moment there are Participant
>>> implementations for the JPA container bundles, but no manager. This
>>> should drop in the next day or so.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:52:05 +0100
>>>> From: zoe.slattery@googlemail.com
>>>> To: aries-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Release?
>>>>
>>>> Alasdair Nottingham wrote:
>>>>> +1 I also agree with excluding spi-fly and subsystems. Don't know what
>>>>> samples-sandbox is, so not sure I care one way or another.
>>>>>
>>>> samples-sandbox is a play area for experiments with new samples.
>>>> Nothing
>>>> in there should ever be part of a release :-)
>>>>> On 11 August 2010 02:45, Donald Woods wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 as the 0.1-incubating JPA module used OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta and
>>>>>> 0.2 is
>>>>>> using the released 2.0.0 level.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Donald
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/10/10 12:54 PM, zoe slattery wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What does anyone think about a second release? The last one was in
>>>>>>> May
>>>>>>> and since then my brief trawl around JIRA indicates that we have:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixed 25 bugs
>>>>>>> Made 21 improvements
>>>>>>> Added 4 new features
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I made a branch of the code yesterday
>>>>>>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/branches/0.2-incubating-RCx/)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and could go on and base a 0.2 release on that branch. I'd like to
>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>> one out because we fixed a few things in the blog sample which
>>>>>>> make it
>>>>>>> easier for people to run and it feels like enough has been fixed
>>>>>>> generally to make it worth doing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Zoe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Joe
Re: Release?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@gmail.com>.
Oh ... I should also point out that I encountered this error using
trunk. I still need to verify if it is present in the 0.2 branch as well.
Joe
On 8/11/10 5:42 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> I also just noticed an error while using some of our samples with JPA.
> I'm not yet sure if this is a problem with the samples or the JPA layer
> ... but I'd like to have have a fix or at least understand what is going
> on before we attempt a release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-378
>
> Joe
>
> On 8/11/10 8:27 AM, Timothy Ward wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to wait for the Quiesce Management bundle to be finished so
>> that it can be in 0.2. At the moment there are Participant
>> implementations for the JPA container bundles, but no manager. This
>> should drop in the next day or so.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>>> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:52:05 +0100
>>> From: zoe.slattery@googlemail.com
>>> To: aries-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Release?
>>>
>>> Alasdair Nottingham wrote:
>>>> +1 I also agree with excluding spi-fly and subsystems. Don't know what
>>>> samples-sandbox is, so not sure I care one way or another.
>>>>
>>> samples-sandbox is a play area for experiments with new samples. Nothing
>>> in there should ever be part of a release :-)
>>>> On 11 August 2010 02:45, Donald Woods wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 as the 0.1-incubating JPA module used OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta and 0.2 is
>>>>> using the released 2.0.0 level.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Donald
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/10/10 12:54 PM, zoe slattery wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does anyone think about a second release? The last one was in
>>>>>> May
>>>>>> and since then my brief trawl around JIRA indicates that we have:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixed 25 bugs
>>>>>> Made 21 improvements
>>>>>> Added 4 new features
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I made a branch of the code yesterday
>>>>>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/branches/0.2-incubating-RCx/)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and could go on and base a 0.2 release on that branch. I'd like to
>>>>>> get
>>>>>> one out because we fixed a few things in the blog sample which
>>>>>> make it
>>>>>> easier for people to run and it feels like enough has been fixed
>>>>>> generally to make it worth doing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Zoe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Joe
Re: Release?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@gmail.com>.
I also just noticed an error while using some of our samples with JPA.
I'm not yet sure if this is a problem with the samples or the JPA layer
... but I'd like to have have a fix or at least understand what is going
on before we attempt a release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-378
Joe
On 8/11/10 8:27 AM, Timothy Ward wrote:
>
> I'd like to wait for the Quiesce Management bundle to be finished so that it can be in 0.2. At the moment there are Participant implementations for the JPA container bundles, but no manager. This should drop in the next day or so.
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:52:05 +0100
>> From: zoe.slattery@googlemail.com
>> To: aries-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Release?
>>
>> Alasdair Nottingham wrote:
>>> +1 I also agree with excluding spi-fly and subsystems. Don't know what
>>> samples-sandbox is, so not sure I care one way or another.
>>>
>> samples-sandbox is a play area for experiments with new samples. Nothing
>> in there should ever be part of a release :-)
>>> On 11 August 2010 02:45, Donald Woods wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 as the 0.1-incubating JPA module used OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta and 0.2 is
>>>> using the released 2.0.0 level.
>>>>
>>>> -Donald
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/10/10 12:54 PM, zoe slattery wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>
>>>>> What does anyone think about a second release? The last one was in May
>>>>> and since then my brief trawl around JIRA indicates that we have:
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixed 25 bugs
>>>>> Made 21 improvements
>>>>> Added 4 new features
>>>>>
>>>>> I made a branch of the code yesterday
>>>>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/branches/0.2-incubating-RCx/)
>>>>> and could go on and base a 0.2 release on that branch. I'd like to get
>>>>> one out because we fixed a few things in the blog sample which make it
>>>>> easier for people to run and it feels like enough has been fixed
>>>>> generally to make it worth doing.
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> Zoe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Joe
RE: Release?
Posted by Timothy Ward <ti...@hotmail.com>.
I'd like to wait for the Quiesce Management bundle to be finished so that it can be in 0.2. At the moment there are Participant implementations for the JPA container bundles, but no manager. This should drop in the next day or so.
Regards
Tim
----------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:52:05 +0100
> From: zoe.slattery@googlemail.com
> To: aries-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Release?
>
> Alasdair Nottingham wrote:
>> +1 I also agree with excluding spi-fly and subsystems. Don't know what
>> samples-sandbox is, so not sure I care one way or another.
>>
> samples-sandbox is a play area for experiments with new samples. Nothing
> in there should ever be part of a release :-)
>> On 11 August 2010 02:45, Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>>> +1 as the 0.1-incubating JPA module used OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta and 0.2 is
>>> using the released 2.0.0 level.
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/10/10 12:54 PM, zoe slattery wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> What does anyone think about a second release? The last one was in May
>>>> and since then my brief trawl around JIRA indicates that we have:
>>>>
>>>> Fixed 25 bugs
>>>> Made 21 improvements
>>>> Added 4 new features
>>>>
>>>> I made a branch of the code yesterday
>>>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/branches/0.2-incubating-RCx/)
>>>> and could go on and base a 0.2 release on that branch. I'd like to get
>>>> one out because we fixed a few things in the blog sample which make it
>>>> easier for people to run and it feels like enough has been fixed
>>>> generally to make it worth doing.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> Zoe
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Release?
Posted by zoe slattery <zo...@googlemail.com>.
Alasdair Nottingham wrote:
> +1 I also agree with excluding spi-fly and subsystems. Don't know what
> samples-sandbox is, so not sure I care one way or another.
>
samples-sandbox is a play area for experiments with new samples. Nothing
in there should ever be part of a release :-)
> On 11 August 2010 02:45, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 as the 0.1-incubating JPA module used OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta and 0.2 is
>> using the released 2.0.0 level.
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 8/10/10 12:54 PM, zoe slattery wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> What does anyone think about a second release? The last one was in May
>>> and since then my brief trawl around JIRA indicates that we have:
>>>
>>> Fixed 25 bugs
>>> Made 21 improvements
>>> Added 4 new features
>>>
>>> I made a branch of the code yesterday
>>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/branches/0.2-incubating-RCx/)
>>> and could go on and base a 0.2 release on that branch. I'd like to get
>>> one out because we fixed a few things in the blog sample which make it
>>> easier for people to run and it feels like enough has been fixed
>>> generally to make it worth doing.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Zoe
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
Re: Release?
Posted by Alasdair Nottingham <no...@apache.org>.
+1 I also agree with excluding spi-fly and subsystems. Don't know what
samples-sandbox is, so not sure I care one way or another.
On 11 August 2010 02:45, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 as the 0.1-incubating JPA module used OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta and 0.2 is
> using the released 2.0.0 level.
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 8/10/10 12:54 PM, zoe slattery wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> What does anyone think about a second release? The last one was in May
>> and since then my brief trawl around JIRA indicates that we have:
>>
>> Fixed 25 bugs
>> Made 21 improvements
>> Added 4 new features
>>
>> I made a branch of the code yesterday
>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/branches/0.2-incubating-RCx/)
>> and could go on and base a 0.2 release on that branch. I'd like to get
>> one out because we fixed a few things in the blog sample which make it
>> easier for people to run and it feels like enough has been fixed
>> generally to make it worth doing.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Zoe
>>
>
--
Alasdair Nottingham
not@apache.org
Re: Release?
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1 as the 0.1-incubating JPA module used OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta and 0.2 is
using the released 2.0.0 level.
-Donald
On 8/10/10 12:54 PM, zoe slattery wrote:
> Hi all
>
> What does anyone think about a second release? The last one was in May
> and since then my brief trawl around JIRA indicates that we have:
>
> Fixed 25 bugs
> Made 21 improvements
> Added 4 new features
>
> I made a branch of the code yesterday
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/branches/0.2-incubating-RCx/)
> and could go on and base a 0.2 release on that branch. I'd like to get
> one out because we fixed a few things in the blog sample which make it
> easier for people to run and it feels like enough has been fixed
> generally to make it worth doing.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Zoe
>
Re: Release?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@gmail.com>.
Yep, sounds like it's time for another release.
Joe
On 8/10/10 12:54 PM, zoe slattery wrote:
> Hi all
>
> What does anyone think about a second release? The last one was in May
> and since then my brief trawl around JIRA indicates that we have:
>
> Fixed 25 bugs
> Made 21 improvements
> Added 4 new features
>
> I made a branch of the code yesterday
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/branches/0.2-incubating-RCx/)
> and could go on and base a 0.2 release on that branch. I'd like to get
> one out because we fixed a few things in the blog sample which make it
> easier for people to run and it feels like enough has been fixed
> generally to make it worth doing.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Zoe
>
--
Joe
Re: Release?
Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
sounds great, and thanks Zoe for initiating this!
Lin
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:54 PM, zoe slattery
<zo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> What does anyone think about a second release? The last one was in May and
> since then my brief trawl around JIRA indicates that we have:
>
> Fixed 25 bugs
> Made 21 improvements
> Added 4 new features
>
> I made a branch of the code yesterday
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/branches/0.2-incubating-RCx/)
> and could go on and base a 0.2 release on that branch. I'd like to get one
> out because we fixed a few things in the blog sample which make it easier
> for people to run and it feels like enough has been fixed generally to make
> it worth doing.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Zoe
>
Re: Release?
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
+1.
We made a lots of improvements to pretty much every module. So I think
we should release every module that's in the 0.2 branch expect maybe
samples-sandbox, subsystems, spi-fly (unless people think they are
ready).
Jarek
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:54 PM, zoe slattery
<zo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> What does anyone think about a second release? The last one was in May and
> since then my brief trawl around JIRA indicates that we have:
>
> Fixed 25 bugs
> Made 21 improvements
> Added 4 new features
>
> I made a branch of the code yesterday
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/branches/0.2-incubating-RCx/)
> and could go on and base a 0.2 release on that branch. I'd like to get one
> out because we fixed a few things in the blog sample which make it easier
> for people to run and it feels like enough has been fixed generally to make
> it worth doing.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Zoe
>