You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Greg Marr <gr...@alum.wpi.edu> on 2001/08/16 15:40:52 UTC
Re: [PATCH] resubmit new and improved ap_vrprintf fix to
handle > 4K
At 03:37 AM 08/16/2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
>Applied and committed. :-)
>
>Ryan
>
>
>On Wednesday 15 August 2001 16:12, Cody Sherr wrote:
> > Small changes, AP_IOBUFSIZE macro (8K) for the buffer size, seemed
> > appropriate, and using local buffer.
IIRC, the buffer was local, but still static, so it has the same
problems as the static buffer outside the function.
--
Greg Marr
gregm@alum.wpi.edu
"We thought you were dead."
"I was, but I'm better now." - Sheridan, "The Summoning"
Re: [PATCH] resubmit new and improved ap_vrprintf fix to handle > 4K
Posted by Ryan Bloom <rb...@covalent.net>.
On Thursday 16 August 2001 06:40, Greg Marr wrote:
> At 03:37 AM 08/16/2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >Applied and committed. :-)
> >
> >Ryan
> >
> >On Wednesday 15 August 2001 16:12, Cody Sherr wrote:
> > > Small changes, AP_IOBUFSIZE macro (8K) for the buffer size, seemed
> > > appropriate, and using local buffer.
>
> IIRC, the buffer was local, but still static, so it has the same
> problems as the static buffer outside the function.
This has been fixed. Thanks for keeping an eye on me. :-)
Ryan
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net
--------------------------------------------------------------