You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@apache.org> on 2002/08/23 19:33:43 UTC
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod core.xml
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 05:24:40PM -0000, ianh@apache.org wrote:
> Index: ap_release.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/include/ap_release.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.69
> retrieving revision 1.70
> diff -u -r1.69 -r1.70
> --- ap_release.h 9 Aug 2002 19:18:59 -0000 1.69
> +++ ap_release.h 23 Aug 2002 17:24:39 -0000 1.70
> @@ -73,7 +73,9 @@
> */
> #define AP_SERVER_BASEVENDOR "Apache Software Foundation"
> #define AP_SERVER_BASEPRODUCT "Apache"
> -#define AP_SERVER_BASEREVISION "2.0.41-dev"
> +#define AP_SERVER_MAJORVERSION "2.0"
> +#define AP_SERVER_MINORVERSION "41-dev"
Eh, no.
major.minor.patch
ServerTokens Major would just print 2 - not 2.0. -- justin
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod core.xml
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:38:57AM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> the problem is that 'minor' would clash with 'minimal' and I don't want
> to break existing configurations.
> Can you think of a term which would mean 'print Apache/2.0'
Hmm. Major-Minor? Or, couldn't we do:
ServerTokens min => minimal
ServerToken minor
The parser would require minor to be spelled out entirely, otherwise
it is treated as minimal. I'm not sure why we even accept the
short-hand forms. The names aren't that long. -- justin
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod core.xml
Posted by Ian Holsman <ia...@apache.org>.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 05:24:40PM -0000, ianh@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Index: ap_release.h
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/include/ap_release.h,v
>> retrieving revision 1.69
>> retrieving revision 1.70
>> diff -u -r1.69 -r1.70
>> --- ap_release.h 9 Aug 2002 19:18:59 -0000 1.69
>> +++ ap_release.h 23 Aug 2002 17:24:39 -0000 1.70
>> @@ -73,7 +73,9 @@
>> */
>> #define AP_SERVER_BASEVENDOR "Apache Software Foundation"
>> #define AP_SERVER_BASEPRODUCT "Apache"
>> -#define AP_SERVER_BASEREVISION "2.0.41-dev"
>> +#define AP_SERVER_MAJORVERSION "2.0"
>> +#define AP_SERVER_MINORVERSION "41-dev"
>
>
> Eh, no.
>
> major.minor.patch
>
doh.
> ServerTokens Major would just print 2 - not 2.0. -- justin
>
the problem is that 'minor' would clash with 'minimal' and I don't want
to break existing configurations.
Can you think of a term which would mean 'print Apache/2.0'
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod core.xml
Posted by Ian Holsman <ia...@apache.org>.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 05:24:40PM -0000, ianh@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Index: ap_release.h
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/include/ap_release.h,v
>> retrieving revision 1.69
>> retrieving revision 1.70
>> diff -u -r1.69 -r1.70
>> --- ap_release.h 9 Aug 2002 19:18:59 -0000 1.69
>> +++ ap_release.h 23 Aug 2002 17:24:39 -0000 1.70
>> @@ -73,7 +73,9 @@
>> */
>> #define AP_SERVER_BASEVENDOR "Apache Software Foundation"
>> #define AP_SERVER_BASEPRODUCT "Apache"
>> -#define AP_SERVER_BASEREVISION "2.0.41-dev"
>> +#define AP_SERVER_MAJORVERSION "2.0"
>> +#define AP_SERVER_MINORVERSION "41-dev"
>
>
> Eh, no.
>
> major.minor.patch
>
doh.
> ServerTokens Major would just print 2 - not 2.0. -- justin
>
the problem is that 'minor' would clash with 'minimal' and I don't want
to break existing configurations.
Can you think of a term which would mean 'print Apache/2.0'