You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Om <bi...@gmail.com> on 2013/03/27 03:55:13 UTC
Update about Utilities repo migration
Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the flex-utilities
git repo.
I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any objections?
We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we would
need that because it was the early days of the Installer project and I am
pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there.
Thanks,
Om
--------
David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549:
-------------------------------------
Okay folks:
I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same
result.
Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn handle
branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to specify a
layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree)
The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1], which is
the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of the
migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout
change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history.
(BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many thanks
for that.)
Let me know how you want to proceed with this.
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617
--------
External repo looks ok (was Re: Update about Utilities repo
migration)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
A unix diff of the flex-external repo reports no errors. It can be opened
for read-write.
On 3/29/13 12:02 AM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The flex-utilities git repo is now read/write. It is available here:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-utilities.git
>
> Also, https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-external.git is up for
> review. Alex, if you can get this reviewed, I will go ahead and ask them
> to open it up for read/write.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Jose Barragan <
> jose.barragan@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> --
>> Jose Barragan
>> Chief Software Architect
>> Codeoscopic Madrid
>> C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92.
>> Planta 5. 505.
>> 28020 Madrid.
>> Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
>>
>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> 2013/3/27 Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>
>>>
>>>> +1 too
>>>>
>>>> -Fred
>>>>
>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Erik de Bruin
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:18 AM
>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> EdB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yup, let's get it done.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the
>>>>>> flex-utilities
>>>>>> git repo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any
>>>>>> objections?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we
>> would
>>>>>> need that because it was the early days of the Installer project and
>> I
>>>>>> am
>>>>>> pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --------
>>>>>> David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549:
>>>>>> ------------------------------**-------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay folks:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same
>>>>>> result.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn
>>>>>> handle
>>>>>> branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to
>> specify
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1],
>> which
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout
>>>>>> change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many
>> thanks
>>>>>> for that.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me know how you want to proceed with this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**view=revision&revision=1373617<
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617>
>>>>>> --------
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>
>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>
>>>> T. 06-51952295
>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> Director de Tecnología
>>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>>> F: +34 912 94 80 80
>>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>>> http://www.directwriter.es
>>> http://www.avant2.es
>>
>>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
The flex-utilities git repo is now read/write. It is available here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-utilities.git
Also, https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-external.git is up for
review. Alex, if you can get this reviewed, I will go ahead and ask them
to open it up for read/write.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Jose Barragan <
jose.barragan@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> +1
> --
> Jose Barragan
> Chief Software Architect
> Codeoscopic Madrid
> C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92.
> Planta 5. 505.
> 28020 Madrid.
> Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
>
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > 2013/3/27 Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>
> >
> >> +1 too
> >>
> >> -Fred
> >>
> >> -----Message d'origine----- From: Erik de Bruin
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:18 AM
> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
> >>
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> EdB
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yup, let's get it done.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the
> >>>> flex-utilities
> >>>> git repo.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any
> >>>> objections?
> >>>>
> >>>> We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we
> would
> >>>> need that because it was the early days of the Installer project and
> I
> >>>> am
> >>>> pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>> --------
> >>>> David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549:
> >>>> ------------------------------**-------
> >>>>
> >>>> Okay folks:
> >>>>
> >>>> I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same
> >>>> result.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn
> >>>> handle
> >>>> branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to
> specify
> >>>> a
> >>>> layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree)
> >>>>
> >>>> The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1],
> which
> >>>> is
> >>>> the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of
> >>>> the
> >>>> migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout
> >>>> change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history.
> >>>>
> >>>> (BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many
> thanks
> >>>> for that.)
> >>>>
> >>>> Let me know how you want to proceed with this.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**view=revision&revision=1373617<
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617>
> >>>> --------
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Alex Harui
> >>> Flex SDK Team
> >>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> >>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>
> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>
> >> T. 06-51952295
> >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Director de Tecnología
> > M: +34 607 22 60 05
> > F: +34 912 94 80 80
> > http://www.codeoscopic.com
> > http://www.directwriter.es
> > http://www.avant2.es
>
>
Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
Posted by Jose Barragan <jo...@codeoscopic.com>.
+1
--
Jose Barragan
Chief Software Architect
Codeoscopic Madrid
C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92.
Planta 5. 505.
28020 Madrid.
Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> 2013/3/27 Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>
>
>> +1 too
>>
>> -Fred
>>
>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Erik de Bruin
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:18 AM
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yup, let's get it done.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the
>>>> flex-utilities
>>>> git repo.
>>>>
>>>> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any
>>>> objections?
>>>>
>>>> We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we would
>>>> need that because it was the early days of the Installer project and I
>>>> am
>>>> pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>> --------
>>>> David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549:
>>>> ------------------------------**-------
>>>>
>>>> Okay folks:
>>>>
>>>> I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same
>>>> result.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn
>>>> handle
>>>> branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to specify
>>>> a
>>>> layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree)
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1], which
>>>> is
>>>> the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of
>>>> the
>>>> migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout
>>>> change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history.
>>>>
>>>> (BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many thanks
>>>> for that.)
>>>>
>>>> Let me know how you want to proceed with this.
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**view=revision&revision=1373617<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617>
>>>> --------
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alex Harui
>>> Flex SDK Team
>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>> T. 06-51952295
>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Director de Tecnología
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> F: +34 912 94 80 80
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.directwriter.es
> http://www.avant2.es
Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
+1
2013/3/27 Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>
> +1 too
>
> -Fred
>
> -----Message d'origine----- From: Erik de Bruin
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:18 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
>
>
> +1
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Yup, let's get it done.
>>
>>
>> On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the
>>> flex-utilities
>>> git repo.
>>>
>>> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any
>>> objections?
>>>
>>> We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we would
>>> need that because it was the early days of the Installer project and I
>>> am
>>> pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>> --------
>>> David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549:
>>> ------------------------------**-------
>>>
>>> Okay folks:
>>>
>>> I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same
>>> result.
>>>
>>> Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn
>>> handle
>>> branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to specify
>>> a
>>> layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree)
>>>
>>> The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1], which
>>> is
>>> the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of
>>> the
>>> migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout
>>> change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history.
>>>
>>> (BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many thanks
>>> for that.)
>>>
>>> Let me know how you want to proceed with this.
>>>
>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**view=revision&revision=1373617<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617>
>>> --------
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnología
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F: +34 912 94 80 80
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.directwriter.es
http://www.avant2.es
Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
+1 too
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Erik de Bruin
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:18 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
+1
EdB
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Yup, let's get it done.
>
>
> On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the
>> flex-utilities
>> git repo.
>>
>> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any
>> objections?
>>
>> We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we would
>> need that because it was the early days of the Installer project and I
>> am
>> pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>> --------
>> David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549:
>> -------------------------------------
>>
>> Okay folks:
>>
>> I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same
>> result.
>>
>> Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn
>> handle
>> branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to specify
>> a
>> layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree)
>>
>> The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1], which
>> is
>> the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of
>> the
>> migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout
>> change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history.
>>
>> (BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many thanks
>> for that.)
>>
>> Let me know how you want to proceed with this.
>>
>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617
>> --------
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
+1
EdB
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Yup, let's get it done.
>
>
> On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the flex-utilities
>> git repo.
>>
>> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any objections?
>>
>> We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we would
>> need that because it was the early days of the Installer project and I am
>> pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>> --------
>> David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549:
>> -------------------------------------
>>
>> Okay folks:
>>
>> I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same
>> result.
>>
>> Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn handle
>> branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to specify a
>> layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree)
>>
>> The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1], which is
>> the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of the
>> migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout
>> change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history.
>>
>> (BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many thanks
>> for that.)
>>
>> Let me know how you want to proceed with this.
>>
>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617
>> --------
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Yup, let's get it done.
On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the flex-utilities
> git repo.
>
> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any objections?
>
> We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we would
> need that because it was the early days of the Installer project and I am
> pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> --------
> David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549:
> -------------------------------------
>
> Okay folks:
>
> I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same
> result.
>
> Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn handle
> branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to specify a
> layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree)
>
> The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1], which is
> the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of the
> migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout
> change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history.
>
> (BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many thanks
> for that.)
>
> Let me know how you want to proceed with this.
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617
> --------
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui