You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com> on 2014/05/13 13:35:20 UTC
Build 5.0.1 release tomorrow?
L.S.,
I deferred most of the remaining issues to 5.0.2 - we probably want to
apply the pull request for separating the drools feature (SM-2288) and
figure out how we want to handle the problem with the ActiveMQ web
console (SM-2267), but other than that we are ready to do a 5.0.1
release in my mind.
Unless someone has anything else that desperately needs to make it in,
how about we try to tick off those final 2 little items today and I'll
cut the release tomorrow?
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
Re: Build 5.0.1 release tomorrow?
Posted by Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com>.
Sorry I have mixed borh versions. 5.0.x has no problem with the itest. But
we should create the separate drools feature
On May 13, 2014 3:48 PM, "Krzysztof Sobkowiak" <kr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> We should add karaf user as workaround for activemq console and apply your
> proposal for the camel drools itest problem.
>
> I'm back on thursday.
>
> Best regards
> Krzysztof
> On May 13, 2014 1:42 PM, "Gert Vanthienen" <ge...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> L.S.,
>>
>>
>> I deferred most of the remaining issues to 5.0.2 - we probably want to
>> apply the pull request for separating the drools feature (SM-2288) and
>> figure out how we want to handle the problem with the ActiveMQ web
>> console (SM-2267), but other than that we are ready to do a 5.0.1
>> release in my mind.
>>
>> Unless someone has anything else that desperately needs to make it in,
>> how about we try to tick off those final 2 little items today and I'll
>> cut the release tomorrow?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>>
>
Re: Build 5.0.1 release tomorrow?
Posted by Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com>.
+1
We should add karaf user as workaround for activemq console and apply your
proposal for the camel drools itest problem.
I'm back on thursday.
Best regards
Krzysztof
On May 13, 2014 1:42 PM, "Gert Vanthienen" <ge...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> I deferred most of the remaining issues to 5.0.2 - we probably want to
> apply the pull request for separating the drools feature (SM-2288) and
> figure out how we want to handle the problem with the ActiveMQ web
> console (SM-2267), but other than that we are ready to do a 5.0.1
> release in my mind.
>
> Unless someone has anything else that desperately needs to make it in,
> how about we try to tick off those final 2 little items today and I'll
> cut the release tomorrow?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
>
Re: Build 5.0.1 release tomorrow?
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
+1
－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
On 2014-5-13, at 下午7:35, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> I deferred most of the remaining issues to 5.0.2 - we probably want to
> apply the pull request for separating the drools feature (SM-2288) and
> figure out how we want to handle the problem with the ActiveMQ web
> console (SM-2267), but other than that we are ready to do a 5.0.1
> release in my mind.
>
> Unless someone has anything else that desperately needs to make it in,
> how about we try to tick off those final 2 little items today and I'll
> cut the release tomorrow?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen