You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Michael Osipov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/02/12 16:48:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6588) Naming conventions should be more technical

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16766232#comment-16766232 ] 

Michael Osipov commented on MNG-6588:
-------------------------------------

Are you thinking about regexp EBNF like in RFCs?

> Naming conventions should be more technical
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-6588
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6588
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation:  General
>    Affects Versions: 3.6.0
>            Reporter: Elliotte Rusty Harold
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: documentation
>
> We should give a precise grammar for group IDs, artifact IDs and versions on https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-naming-conventions.html
> rather than fuzzy language like "you can choose whatever name you want with lowercase letters and no strange symbols"
> This can probably be done by reference to the Java naming rules rather than spelling it out.
> The version section should mention semantic versioning and Snapshots. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)