You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2005/09/28 09:52:52 UTC

Schema version names

I've changed the schema namespaces and files to include version 
numbers, and am using an xmlbeans feature so the old namespaces still 
work.  Currently the namespace versions look like this:

http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/application-client-1.0

The openejb schemas look like this:

http://www.openejb.org/xml/ns/openejb-jar-2.0

There are a couple openejb schemas with a different name pattern:

http://www.openejb.org/xml/ns/corba-css-config_1_0

I'd rather have one pattern.  I picked the one I'm using because it is 
most similar to maven versioning.

Questions:

1. Anyone have a problem with the -x.y version style?
2. Should the openejb schemas be version 2.0 (following openejb) or 1.0 
(not sure why this would be plausible)
3. Should I change the css/tss namespaces to

http://www.openejb.org/xml/ns/corba-css-config-2.0
http://www.openejb.org/xml/ns/corba-tss-config-2.0

thanks
david jencks

Re: Schema version names

Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.

On Sep 28, 2005, at 12:52 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> 1. Anyone have a problem with the -x.y version style?

I like that pattern too.

> 2. Should the openejb schemas be version 2.0 (following openejb) or  
> 1.0 (not sure why this would be plausible)

Let's use 2.0, then I can change the namespace of the openejb-jar.xml  
in the 1.0 code to be http://www.openejb.org/xml/ns/openejb-jar-1.0.

> 3. Should I change the css/tss namespaces to
>
> http://www.openejb.org/xml/ns/corba-css-config-2.0
> http://www.openejb.org/xml/ns/corba-tss-config-2.0
>

+1

David

Re: Schema version names

Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.

On 9/28/05, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 1. Anyone have a problem with the -x.y version style?

Looks good to me

> 2. Should the openejb schemas be version 2.0 (following openejb) or 1.0
> (not sure why this would be plausible)

I vote 2.0

> 3. Should I change the css/tss namespaces to
>
> http://www.openejb.org/xml/ns/corba-css-config-2.0
> http://www.openejb.org/xml/ns/corba-tss-config-2.0

I think so