You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@logging.apache.org by Kabilan VK <ka...@gmail.com> on 2019/10/01 22:14:30 UTC
Re: Is Log4Net project abandoned?
Hi Dominik,
I can allocate some time to help setting up the builds for Log4Net. Let me
know what tasks I can start with.
I would suggest https://dev.azure.com as a replacement for NAnt. The azure
pipeline is free for GitHub projects and have support to the latest
frameworks.
Regards,
Kabilan
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 7:54 AM Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Streamlining the architectures across the different log4* implementations
> has been discussed earlier. It would make sense to split log4net into
> several libraries (api, configuration, several appender.xxx, etc). Further
> make these assemblies all available over nuget. I could imagine this to
> become part of a not yet existing 3.0 milestone if the community is willing
> to contribute. I see also more important things to flesh out (getting a
> release out of the door, reimplement the rolling file appender, replace
> nant to improve builds and their automation, automate deployments to nuget,
> ..).
>
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 17:31, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > SLF4J is an earlier alternative to log4j-api, but it's not a
> > replacement. If the other log4* projects adopt similar architectures
> > to log4j2, they can all have API/implementation separation and
> > potentially compatible config files, though that's not really planned
> > by anyone that I know of.
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 23:15, Brown, Michael A <ma...@purdue.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > Any action on slf* as log4* replacement?
> > >
> > > I don’t have any issues with log4* or know a great deal about slf* but
> > some of what I read indicates some developers moving in that direction.
> > >
> > > Any comments?
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 5:10:50 PM
> > > To: dev@logging.apache.org <de...@logging.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: Is Log4Net project abandoned?
> > >
> > > I had this message in draft for quite some time now and just now I
> > decided
> > > to send it in a slightly modified version.
> > >
> > > While log4net has been around for a while it may have come the point in
> > > time when it has reached end of life. A good indicator to me is the
> > number
> > > of active contributors. This means that the decision is obviously
> > community
> > > driven. So long people step up and get involved the project is healthy.
> > Me
> > > being the only one to do releases, review and apply PR, etc does not
> > scale.
> > > Any contribution is welcome!
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > --
> > > Dominik Psenner
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019, 20:00 Kabilan VK <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The last commit was on 2017 so, its becoming a less favor to new
> > startup
> > > > projects. I tried to contribute by adding latest .net framework
> > support so,
> > > > at least need a PR review support to get this on track.
> > > > Thanks for understanding.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Kabilan
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 29 Jun, 2019, 4:31 AM Jochen Wiedmann, <
> > jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 1:21 PM Dominik Psenner <
> dpsenner@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > We could also push log4net back to incubation. What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > > > If availability of people is an issue, then this would be an
> > excellent
> > > > > way of exhausting those even more.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jochen
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
> >
>
>
> --
> Dominik Psenner
>
--
=================
Thanks and Regards
Kabilan.vk
Re: Is Log4Net project abandoned?
Posted by Kabilan VK <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dominik,
I have setup a sample build for Log4Net.standard solution. Let me know if
its okay to proceed then we can migrate all builds to azure devops.
https://dev.azure.com/logging-log4net/Log4Net/_build/results?buildId=20&view=artifacts
Regards,
Kabilan
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:14 PM Kabilan VK <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
> I can allocate some time to help setting up the builds for Log4Net. Let me
> know what tasks I can start with.
> I would suggest https://dev.azure.com as a replacement for NAnt. The
> azure pipeline is free for GitHub projects and have support to the latest
> frameworks.
>
> Regards,
> Kabilan
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 7:54 AM Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Streamlining the architectures across the different log4* implementations
>> has been discussed earlier. It would make sense to split log4net into
>> several libraries (api, configuration, several appender.xxx, etc). Further
>> make these assemblies all available over nuget. I could imagine this to
>> become part of a not yet existing 3.0 milestone if the community is
>> willing
>> to contribute. I see also more important things to flesh out (getting a
>> release out of the door, reimplement the rolling file appender, replace
>> nant to improve builds and their automation, automate deployments to
>> nuget,
>> ..).
>>
>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 17:31, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > SLF4J is an earlier alternative to log4j-api, but it's not a
>> > replacement. If the other log4* projects adopt similar architectures
>> > to log4j2, they can all have API/implementation separation and
>> > potentially compatible config files, though that's not really planned
>> > by anyone that I know of.
>> >
>> > On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 23:15, Brown, Michael A <ma...@purdue.edu> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Any action on slf* as log4* replacement?
>> > >
>> > > I don’t have any issues with log4* or know a great deal about slf* but
>> > some of what I read indicates some developers moving in that direction.
>> > >
>> > > Any comments?
>> > >
>> > > Mike
>> > >
>> > > Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>> > > ________________________________
>> > > From: Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>
>> > > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 5:10:50 PM
>> > > To: dev@logging.apache.org <de...@logging.apache.org>
>> > > Subject: Re: Is Log4Net project abandoned?
>> > >
>> > > I had this message in draft for quite some time now and just now I
>> > decided
>> > > to send it in a slightly modified version.
>> > >
>> > > While log4net has been around for a while it may have come the point
>> in
>> > > time when it has reached end of life. A good indicator to me is the
>> > number
>> > > of active contributors. This means that the decision is obviously
>> > community
>> > > driven. So long people step up and get involved the project is
>> healthy.
>> > Me
>> > > being the only one to do releases, review and apply PR, etc does not
>> > scale.
>> > > Any contribution is welcome!
>> > >
>> > > Best regards
>> > > --
>> > > Dominik Psenner
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019, 20:00 Kabilan VK <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > The last commit was on 2017 so, its becoming a less favor to new
>> > startup
>> > > > projects. I tried to contribute by adding latest .net framework
>> > support so,
>> > > > at least need a PR review support to get this on track.
>> > > > Thanks for understanding.
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Kabilan
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sat, 29 Jun, 2019, 4:31 AM Jochen Wiedmann, <
>> > jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 1:21 PM Dominik Psenner <
>> dpsenner@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > We could also push log4net back to incubation. What do you
>> think?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > If availability of people is an issue, then this would be an
>> > excellent
>> > > > > way of exhausting those even more.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Jochen
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dominik Psenner
>>
>
>
> --
>
> =================
> Thanks and Regards
> Kabilan.vk
>
--
=================
Thanks and Regards
Kabilan.vk